Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900572guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Theory of Mind Modeling in Search and Rescue Teams

Published: 29 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) refers to the ability to make inferences about other’s mental states. Such ability is fundamental for human social activities such as empathy, teamwork, and communication. As intelligent agents come to be involved in diverse human-agent teams, they will also be expected to be socially intelligent in order to become effective teammates. In this paper, we describe a computational ToM model which observes team behaviors and infers their mental states in a urban search and rescue (US&R) task. Our modular ToM model approximates human inference by explicitly representing beliefs, belief updates, and action prediction/generation using Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). To validate our model we compare its performance to the gold standard of human observers asked to make the same inferences. The ToM model proved superior to the average judgments of human observers on all four tests of inference and better than 90th percentile observers on three of the four. While the learning bias provided by modularizing belief and prediction proved sufficient for the simple inferences tested, substantial refinement will be needed to replicate the complex nuanced chains of inference observed in human social interaction.

References

[1]
contributors, “Theory of mind — wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.”
[2]
C. Baker, R. Saxe, and J. Tenenbaum, "Bayesian theory of mind: Modeling joint belief-desire attribution," Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 01 2011.
[3]
S. Baron-Cohen, A. Leslie, and U. Frith, “Does the autistic child have a ”theory of mind," Cognition, pp. 37–46, 1985.
[4]
M. Bratman, Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason.Harvard University Press, 1987.
[5]
S. Stich and I. Ravenscroft, “What is folk psychology?” Cognition, pp. 447–468, 1992.
[6]
M. Tomasello, M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, and H. Moll, “Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition,” Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 675–691, 2005.
[7]
H. Wimmer and J. Perner, “Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception,” Cognition, pp. 103–128, 1983.
[8]
D. Poulin-Dubois, E. Dutemple, and K. Burnside, “Naïve theories of biology, physics, and psychology in children with asd,” J Autism Dev Disord, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 3600–3609, 2021.
[9]
H. M. Wellman and C. C. Peterson, “Theory of mind, development, and deafness,” in Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience, S. Baron-Cohen, M. Lombardo, and H. Tager-Flusberg, Eds., 2013, pp. 51–71.
[10]
D. Samson and I. Apperly, “There is more to mind reading than having theory of mind concepts: new directions in theory of mind research,” Infant Child Development, pp. 443–454, 2010.
[11]
S. Birch, “When knowledge is a curse: children’s and adults reasoning about mental states,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, pp. 1–5, 2005.
[12]
H. Li, K. Zheng, M. Lewis, D. Hughes, and K. Sycara, “Human theory of mind inference in search and rescue tasks,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 65, no. 1. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2021, pp. 648–652.
[13]
C. Baker, R. Saxe, and J. Tenenbaum, “Bayesian theory of mind: Modeling joint belief-desire attribution,” in Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, vol. 33, 2011.
[14]
B. Scassellati, “Theory of mind for a humanoid robot,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2002.
[15]
C. Breazeal, J. Gray, and M. Berlin, “An embodied cognition approach to mindreading skills for socially intelligent robots,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 656–680, 2009.
[16]
J. Oh, F. Meneguzzi, and K. Sycara, “Probabilistic plan recognition for proactive assistant agents,” Plan, activity, and intent recognition., vol. 10, p. 23, 2014.
[17]
J. Oh, F. Meneguzzi, K. Sycara, and T. J. Norman, “Prognostic normative reasoning,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 863–872, 2013.
[18]
C. L. Baker, R. Saxe, and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Action understanding as inverse planning,” Cognition, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 329–349, 2009.
[19]
S. Liu, T. D. Ullman, J. B. Tenenbaum, and E. S. Spelke, “Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6366, pp. 1038–1041, 2017.
[20]
C. L. Baker, J. Jara-Ettinger, R. Saxe, and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2017.
[21]
N. Rabinowitz, F. Perbet, F. Song, C. Zhang, S. A. Eslami, and M. Botvinick, “Machine theory of mind,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 4218–4227.
[22]
V. Jain, R. Jena, H. Li, T. Gupta, D. Hughes, M. Lewis, and K. Sycara, “Predicting human strategies in simulated search and rescue task,” Accepted at NeurIPS 2020; Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Response (AI+HADR 2020), 2020.
[23]
I. Oguntola, D. Hughes, and K. Sycara, “Deep interpretable models of theory of mind,” in 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 2021, pp. 657–664.
[24]
Y. Guo, R. Jena, D. Hughes, M. Lewis, and K. Sycara, “Transfer learning for human navigation and triage strategies prediction in a simulated urban search and rescue task,” in 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 2021, pp. 784–791.
[25]
H. Li, L. Le, M. Chis, D. Hughes, M. Lewis, and K. Sycara, “Sequential theory of mind modeling in team search and rescue tasks,” in AAAI Fall Symposium of Computational Theory of Mind for Human-Machine Teams, 2021.
[26]
L. A. DeChurch and J. R. Mesmer-Magnus, “The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis.” Journal of applied psychology, vol. 95, no. 1, p. 32, 2010.
[27]
S. Fiore, B. Bracken, M. Demir, J. Freeman, M. Lewis, and L. Huang, “Transdisciplinary team research to develop theory of mind in humanai teams,” Proceedings of the Sixty-fourth Annual Conference of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2020.
[28]
S. Baron-Cohen, A. M. Leslie, and U. Frith, “Does the autistic child have a ”theory of mind"?" Cognition, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 1985.
[29]
M. Georgeff, B. Pell, M. Pollack, M. Tambe, and M. Wooldridge, “The belief-desire-intention model of agency,” in International workshop on agent theories, architectures, and languages. Springer, 1998, pp. 1–10.
[30]
T. Salimans, A. Karpathy, X. Chen, and D. P. Kingma, “Pixelcnn++: Improving the pixelcnn with discretized logistic mixture likelihood and other modifications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.05517, 2017.
[31]
S. V. Albrecht and P. Stone, “Autonomous agents modelling other agents: A comprehensive survey and open problems,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 258, p. 66–95, May 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.01.002
[32]
P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque, “Intention is choice with commitment,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 213–261, 1990.
[33]
B. J. Grosz and S. Kraus, “Collaborative plans for complex group action,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 269–357, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0004370295001034
[34]
S. Mindermann and S. Armstrong, “Occam’s razor is insufficient to infer the preferences of irrational agents,” in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, ser. NIPS’18. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2018, p. 5603–5614.

Index Terms

  1. Theory of Mind Modeling in Search and Rescue Teams
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)
    Aug 2022
    1654 pages

    Publisher

    IEEE Press

    Publication History

    Published: 29 August 2022

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media