Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9635952guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Stable Haptic Teleoperation of UAVs via Small L<inf>2</inf> Gain and Control Barrier Functions

Published: 27 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

We present a novel haptic teleoperation approach that considers not only the safety but also the stability of a teleoperation system. Specifically, we build upon previous work on haptic shared control, which generates a reference haptic feedback that helps the human operator to safely navigate the robot but without taking away their control authority. Crucially, in this approach the force rendered to the user is not directly reflected in the motion of the robot (which is still directly controlled by the user); however, previous work in the area neglected to consider the possible instabilities in feedback loop generated by a user that over-responds to the haptic force. In this paper we introduce a differential constraint on the rendered force that makes the system finite-gain ${{\mathcal{L}}_2}$ stable; the constraint results in a Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Program (QCQP), for which we provide a closed-form solution. Our constraint is related to, but less restrictive than, the typical passivity constraint used in previous literature. We conducted an experimental simulation in which a human operator flies a UAV near an obstacle to evaluate the proposed method.

References

[1]
J. S. McCarley and C. D. Wickens, “Human factors implications of uavs in the national airspace,” Aviation Human Factors Division, Savoy, IL, Tech. Rep. AHFD-05-05/FAA-05-01, 2005.
[2]
A. M. Brandt and M. B. Colton, “Haptic collision avoidance for a remotely operated quadrotor UAV in indoor environments,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2010, pp. 2724–2731.
[3]
X. Hou and R. Mahony, “Dynamic kinesthetic boundary for haptic teleoperation of aerial robotic vehicles,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2013, pp. 4549–4950.
[4]
D. Zhang, G. Yang, and R. P. Khurshid, “Haptic teleoperation of uavs through control barrier functions,” IEEE Trans. on Haptics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 109–115, 2020.
[5]
S. Stramigioli, R. Mahony, and P. Corke, “A novel approach to haptic tele-operation of aerial robot vehicles,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2010, pp. 5302–5308.
[6]
H. Rifaï, M.-D. Hua, T. Hamel, and P. Morin, “Haptic-based bilateral teleoperation of underactuated unmanned aerial vehicles,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 13 782–13 788, 2011.
[7]
G. Gioioso, M. Mohammadi, A. Franchi, and D. Prattichizzo, “A force-based bilateral teleoperation framework for aerial robots in contact with the environment,” in IEEE Intel. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2015, pp. 318–324.
[8]
T. M. Lam, H. W. Boschloo, M. Mulder, and M. M. Van Paassen, “Artificial force field for haptic feedback in UAV teleoperation,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1316–1330, 2009.
[9]
S. Omari, M.-D. Hua, G. Ducard, and T. Hamel, “Bilateral haptic teleoperation of VTOL UAVs,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2013, pp. 2393–2399.
[10]
A. Y. Mersha, S. Stramigioli, and R. Carloni, “On bilateral teleoperation of aerial robots,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 258–274, 2013.
[11]
G. Niemeyer, C. Preusche, and G. Hirzinger, “Telerobotics,” in Springer handbook of robotics, 2008, pp. 741–757.
[12]
D. Lee and K. Huang, “Passive-set-position-modulation framework for interactive robotic systems,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 354–369, 2010.
[13]
D. Lee, A. Franchi, P. R. Giordano, H. I. Son, and H. H. Bülthoff, “Haptic teleoperation of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles over the internet,” in IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2011, pp. 1341–1347.
[14]
A. D. Ames, S. Coogan, M. Egerstedt, G. Notomista, K. Sreenath, and P. Tabuada, “Control barrier functions: Theory and applications,” in European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE, 2019, pp. 3420–3431.
[15]
Q. Nguyen and K. Sreenath, “Exponential control barrier functions for enforcing high relative-degree safety-critical constraints,” in American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2016, pp. 322–328.
[16]
H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear systems. Prentice hallUpper Saddle River, 2002, vol. 3.
[17]
E. Rohmer, S. P. Singh, and M. Freese, “V-rep: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework,” in IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2013, pp. 1321–1326.

Index Terms

  1. Stable Haptic Teleoperation of UAVs via Small L<inf>2</inf> Gain and Control Barrier Functions
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
    Sep 2021
    7915 pages

    Publisher

    IEEE Press

    Publication History

    Published: 27 September 2021

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media