Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/INFOCOM41043.2020.9155488guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

A Converse Result on Convergence Time for Opportunistic Wireless Scheduling

Published: 06 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proves an impossibility result for stochastic network utility maximization for multi-user wireless systems, including multi-access and broadcast systems. Every time slot an access point observes the current channel states and opportunistically selects a vector of transmission rates. Channel state vectors are assumed to be independent and identically distributed with an unknown probability distribution. The goal is to learn to make decisions over time that maximize a concave utility function of the running time average transmission rate of each user. Recently it was shown that a stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithm converges to utility-optimality with an error of O(log(T)/T), where T is the time the algorithm has been running. An existing Ω(1/T) converse is known. The current paper improves the converse to Ω(log(T)/T), which matches the known achievability result. The proof uses a reduction from the opportunistic scheduling problem to a Bernoulli estimation problem. Along the way, it refines a result on Bernoulli estimation.

References

[1]
M. J. Neely, Convergence and adaptation for utility optimal opportunistic scheduling. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 27(3):904–917, June 2019.
[2]
M. J. Neely, Stochastic Network Optimization with Application to Communication and Queueing Systems. Morgan & Claypool, 2010.
[3]
F. Kelly, Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European Transactions on Telecommunications, vol. 8, no. 1 pp. 33-37, Jan.-Feb. 1997.
[4]
F.P. Kelly, A. Maulloo, and D. Tan, Rate control for communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness, and stability. Journ. of the Operational Res. Society, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 237-252, March 1998.
[5]
J. Mo and J. Walrand. Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 8, no. 5, Oct. 2000.
[6]
E. Altman, K. Avrachenkov, and A. Garnaev, Generalized α-fair resource allocation in wireless networks. In Proc. Conference on Decision and Control, Dec. 2008.
[7]
T. Lan, D. Kao, M. Chiang, and A. Sabharwal, An axiomatic theory of fairness in network resource allocation. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, March 2010.
[8]
H. Kushner and P. Whiting. Asymptotic properties of proportional-fair sharing algorithms. Proc. 40th Annual Allerton Conf. on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, IL, Oct. 2002.
[9]
R. Agrawal and V. Subramanian. Optimality of certain channel aware scheduling policies. Proc. 40th Annual Allerton Conf. on Communication, Control, and Computing, Monticello, IL, Oct. 2002.
[10]
M. J. Neely, E. Modiano, and C. Li, Fairness and optimal stochastic control for heterogeneous networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 396-409, April 2008.
[11]
M. J. Neely, Energy optimal control for time varying wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 2915-2934, July 2006.
[12]
A. Eryilmaz and R. Srikant. Joint congestion control, routing, and MAC for stability and fairness in wireless networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Special Issue on Nonlinear Optimization of Communication Systems, vol. 14, pp. 1514-1524, Aug. 2006.
[13]
A. Eryilmaz and R. Srikant. Fair resource allocation in wireless networks using queue-length-based scheduling and congestion control. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1333-1344, Dec. 2007.
[14]
A. Stolyar, Maximizing queueing network utility subject to stability: Greedy primal-dual algorithm. Queueing Systems, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 401-457, 2005.
[15]
A. Stolyar, Greedy primal-dual algorithm for dynamic resource allocation in complex networks. Queueing Systems, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 203-220, 2006.
[16]
E. Hazan and S. Kale. Beyond the regret minimization barrier: an optimal algorithm for stochastic strongly-convex optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15 (July):pp. 2489–2512, 2014.
[17]
E. Hazan, A. Agarwal, and S. Kale, Logarithmic regret algorithms for online convex optimization. Machine Learning, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 169-192, Dec. 2007.
[18]
M. Zinkevich. Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent. Proc. 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2003.
[19]
Y. Nesterov, Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization: A Basic Course. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2004.
[20]
M. J. Neely, A converse result on convergence time for opportunistic wireless scheduling. ArXiv Technical Report, arXiv:2001.01031, Jan. 2020.
[21]
T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications
Jul 2020
2647 pages

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 06 July 2020

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media