Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/ICDMW.2010.81guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Co-occurrence based predictors for estimating query difficulty

Published: 13 December 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Query difficulty prediction aims to identify, in advance, how reliably an information retrieval system will perform when faced with a particular user request. The prediction of query difficulty level is an interesting and important issue in Information Retrieval (IR) and is still an open research. In order to appreciate importance of query difficulty prediction we present an example., Information Retrieval (IR) is the Science of searching the relevant documents based on user’s need and a way towards discovering knowledge from text data. User’s needs are often expressed in terms of query. It has been observed that there is a word mismatch problem while matching user’s query to the documents. This is because users and authors of documents do not use same vocabulary. Query expansion/reformulation is a method to overcome such mismatch in terminology. Query expansion (QE) has become a well known technique that has been shown to improve average retrieval performance. However despite extensive research QE does not provide consistent gains over different query sets and collections. Therefore this technique has not been used in many operational systems as it may degrade performance of individual queries. A thorough investigation into robustness of query expansion is required in order to ensure reliability of query expansion for individual queries. It is well-known in the Information Retrieval community that methods such as query expansion can help ”easy” queries but are detrimental to ”hard” queries If the performance of queries can be predicted before retrieval then specific measures can be taken to improve the overall performance of the system. In this paper we do thorough investigations of various query difficulty predictors l and suggest two new query predictorsl based on co-occurrence of query terms. To evaluate the predictors, we have experimented on standard TREC collections. Our work is significant as it is a step towards judging reliability and robustness of query processing operations such as query expansion.

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Query difficulty estimation via relevance prediction for image retrievalSignal Processing10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.07.018110:C(232-243)Online publication date: 1-May-2015
  • (2012)When video search goes wrongProceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia10.1145/2393347.2393395(319-328)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2012
  • (2011)Learning to judge image search resultsProceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia10.1145/2072298.2072346(363-372)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2011

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
ICDMW '10: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops
December 2010
1429 pages
ISBN:9780769542577

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 13 December 2010

Author Tags

  1. Pre-retrieval query predictors
  2. information retrieval
  3. query difficulty

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)Query difficulty estimation via relevance prediction for image retrievalSignal Processing10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.07.018110:C(232-243)Online publication date: 1-May-2015
  • (2012)When video search goes wrongProceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia10.1145/2393347.2393395(319-328)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2012
  • (2011)Learning to judge image search resultsProceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia10.1145/2072298.2072346(363-372)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2011

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media