Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1109/ASE.2013.6693072acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Bita: Coverage-guided, automatic testing of actor programs

Published: 11 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Actor programs are concurrent programs where concurrent entities communicate asynchronously by exchanging messages. Testing actor programs is challenging because the order of message receives depends on the nondeterministic scheduler and because exploring all schedules does not scale to large programs. This paper presents Bita, a scalable, automatic approach for testing non-deterministic behavior of actor programs. The key idea is to generate and explore schedules that are likely to reveal concurrency bugs because these schedules increase the schedule coverage. We present three schedule coverage criteria for actor programs, an algorithm to generate feasible schedules that increase coverage, and a technique to force a program to comply with a schedule. Applying Bita to real-world actor programs implemented in Scala reveals eight previously unknown concurrency bugs, of which six have already been fixed by the developers. Furthermore, we show our approach to find bugs 122x faster than random scheduling, on average.

References

[1]
https://github.com/uzh/signal-collect/issues/58.
[2]
"Fyrie redis," https://github.com/derekjw/fyrie-redis/tree/akka-1.2.
[3]
"Gatling stress tool," http://gatling-tool.org/.
[4]
"Geotrellis," http://www.azavea.com/products/geotrellis/.
[5]
"Signal/collect," http://uzh.github.io/signal-collect/.
[6]
G. Agha, ACTORS: a model of concurrent computation in distributed systems. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1986.
[7]
J. Armstrong, "Making reliable distributed systems in the presence of software errors," Ph.D. dissertation, Kungl Tekniska Högskolan, 2003, http://www.erlang.org.
[8]
J. Bonér, V. Klang, R. Kuhn et al., "Akka library," http://akka.io.
[9]
A. Bron, E. Farchi, Y. Magid, Y. Nir, and S. Ur, "Applications of synchronization coverage," in PPOPP, 2005, pp. 206-212.
[10]
S. Burckhardt, P. Kothari, M. Musuvathi, and S. Nagarakatte, "A randomized scheduler with probabilistic guarantees of finding bugs," in ASPLOS, 2010, pp. 167-178.
[11]
S. Bykov, A. Geller, G. Kliot, J. R. Larus, R. Pandya, and J. Thelin, "Orleans: cloud computing for everyone," in SOCC, 2011, pp. 16:1-16:14.
[12]
F. Chen, T. F. Serbanuta, and G. Rosu, "jPredictor: a predictive runtime analysis tool for java," in ICSE, 2008, pp. 221-230.
[13]
M. Christakis and K. Sagonas, "Detection of asynchronous message passing errors using static analysis," in PADL, 2011, pp. 5-18.
[14]
M. Christakis and K. F. Sagonas, "Detection of asynchronous message passing errors using static analysis," in PADL, 2011, pp. 5-18.
[15]
K. Claessen, M. Palka, N. Smallbone, J. Hughes, H. Svensson, T. Arts, and U. T. Wiger, "Finding race conditions in Erlang with QuickCheck and PULSE," in ICFP, 2009, pp. 149-160.
[16]
K. E. Coons, S. Burckhardt, and M. Musuvathi, "GAMBIT: effective unit testing for concurrency libraries," in PPOPP, 2010, pp. 15-24.
[17]
E. Deniz, A. Sen, and J. Holt, "Verification and coverage of message passing multicore applications." ACM T Des Automat El, p. 23, 2012.
[18]
O. Edelstein, E. Farchi, Y. Nir, G. Ratsaby, and S. Ur, "Multithreaded Java program test generation," IBM Syst J, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 111-125, 2002.
[19]
C. Flanagan and S. N. Freund, "Adversarial memory for detecting destructive races," in PLDI, 2010, pp. 244-254.
[20]
L.-Å. Fredlund and H. Svensson, "Mcerlang: a model checker for a distributed functional programming language," in ICFP, 2007, pp. 125-136.
[21]
Q. Gao, W. Zhang, Z. Chen, M. Zheng, and F. Qin, "2ndstrike: toward manifesting hidden concurrency typestate bugs," in ASPLOS, 2011, pp. 239-250.
[22]
P. Godefroid and N. Nagappan, "Concurrency at Microsoft - an exploratory survey," in EC2, 2008.
[23]
P. Haller and F. Sommers, Actors in Scala. Artima, 2012.
[24]
C. Hewitt, P. Bishop, and R. Steiger, "A universal modular actor formalism for artificial intelligence," in IJCAI, 1973, pp. 235-245.
[25]
S. Hong, J. Ahn, S. Park, M. Kim, and M. J. Harrold, "Testing concurrent programs to achieve high synchronization coverage," in ISSTA, 2012, pp. 210-220.
[26]
J. Huang and C. Zhang, "Persuasive prediction of concurrency access anomalies," in ISSTA, 2011, pp. 144-154.
[27]
V. Jagannath, M. Gligoric, D. Jin, Q. Luo, G. Rosu, and D. Marinov, "Improved multithreaded unit testing," in ESEC/FSE, 2011, pp. 223-233.
[28]
P. Joshi, M. Naik, C.-S. Park, and K. Sen, "CalFuzzer: An extensible active testing framework for concurrent programs," in CAV, 2009, pp. 675-681.
[29]
R. K. Karmani, A. Shali, and G. Agha, "Actor frameworks for the JVM platform: a comparative analysis," in PPPJ, 2009, pp. 11-20.
[30]
B. Krena, Z. Letko, and T. Vojnar, "Coverage metrics for saturation-based and search-based testing of concurrent software," in RV, 2011, pp. 177-192.
[31]
Z. Lai, S.-C. Cheung, and W. K. Chan, "Detecting atomic-set serializability violations in multithreaded programs through active randomized testing," in ICSE, 2010, pp. 235-244.
[32]
S. Lauterburg, M. Dotta, D. Marinov, and G. A. Agha, "A framework for state-space exploration of Java-based actor programs," in ASE, 2009, pp. 468-479.
[33]
Y. Lei and W. E. Wong, "A novel framework for nondeterministic testing of message-passing programs." in HASE, 2005, pp. 66-75.
[34]
B. Long, D. Hoffman, and P. Strooper, "Tool support for testing concurrent Java components," IEEE Tr Softw Eng, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 555-566, Jun. 2003.
[35]
S. Lu, W. Jiang, and Y. Zhou, "A study of interleaving coverage criteria," in ESEC/FSE, 2007, pp. 533-536.
[36]
M. Musuvathi, S. Qadeer, T. Ball, G. Basler, P. A. Nainar, and I. Neamtiu, "Finding and reproducing Heisenbugs in concurrent programs," in OSDI, 2008, pp. 267-280.
[37]
C.-S. Park and K. Sen, "Randomized active atomicity violation detection in concurrent programs," in FSE, 2008, pp. 135-145.
[38]
S. Park, S. Lu, and Y. Zhou, "CTrigger: exposing atomicity violation bugs from their hiding places," in ASPLOS, 2009, pp. 25-36.
[39]
V. Pech, D. König, R. Winder et al., "GPars," http://gpars.codehaus.org/.
[40]
W. Pugh and N. Ayewah, "Unit testing concurrent software," in ASE, 2007, pp. 513-516.
[41]
K. Sen, "Effective random testing of concurrent programs," in ASE, 2007, pp. 323-332.
[42]
K. Sen, "Race directed random testing of concurrent programs," in PLDI, 2008, pp. 11-21.
[43]
K. Sen and G. Agha, "Automated systematic testing of open distributed programs," in FASE, 2006, pp. 339-356.
[44]
F. Sorrentino, A. Farzan, and P. Madhusudan, "PENELOPE: weaving threads to expose atomicity violations," in FSE, 2010, pp. 37-46.
[45]
S. R. S. Souza, S. R. Vergilio, P. S. L. Souza, A. S. Simão, and A. C. Hausen, "Structural testing criteria for message-passing parallel programs," Concurr Comput: Pract Exper, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 1893-1916, Nov. 2008.
[46]
S. Tasharofi, "Efficient testing of actor programs with nondeterministic behavior," University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Tech. Rep., 2013, http://hdl.handle.net/2142/45680.
[47]
S. Tasharofi, M. Gligoric, D. Marinov, and R. Johnson, "Setac: A framework for phased deterministic testing of scala actor programs," in Scala Days, 2011.
[48]
S. Tasharofi, R. K. Karmani, S. Lauterburg, A. Legay, D. Marinov, and G. Agha, "TransDPOR: A novel dynamic partial-order reduction technique for testing actor programs," in FMOODS/FORTE.
[49]
R. N. Taylor, D. L. Levine, and C. D. Kelly, "Structural testing of concurrent programs," IEEE Tr Softw Eng, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 206-215, 1992.
[50]
W. Visser, K. Havelund, G. P. Brat, S. Park, and F. Lerda, "Model checking programs," Autom Software Eng, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 203-232, 2003.
[51]
C.-S. D. Yang, A. L. Souter, and L. L. Pollock, "All-du-path coverage for parallel programs," in ISSTA, 1998, pp. 153-162.
[52]
J. Yu, S. Narayanasamy, C. Pereira, and G. Pokam, "Maple: a coveragedriven testing tool for multithreaded programs," in OOPSLA, 2012, pp. 485-502.
[53]
W. Zhang, J. Lim, R. Olichandran, J. Scherpelz, G. Jin, S. Lu, and T. W. Reps, "ConSeq: detecting concurrency bugs through sequential errors," in ASPLOS, 2011, pp. 251-264.
[54]
W. Zhang, C. Sun, and S. Lu, "ConMem: detecting severe concurrency bugs through an effect-oriented approach," in ASPLOS, 2010, pp. 179-192.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)High-performance Deterministic Concurrency Using Lingua FrancaACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/361768720:4(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Code Coverage Criteria for Asynchronous ProgramsProceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3611643.3616292(1307-1319)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Actor concurrency bugs: a comprehensive study on symptoms, root causes, API usages, and differencesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/34282824:OOPSLA(1-32)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ASE '13: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
November 2013
765 pages
ISBN:9781479902156
  • General Chair:
  • Ewen Denney,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Tevfik Bultan,
  • Andreas Zeller

Sponsors

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 11 November 2013

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ASE '13
Sponsor:
ASE '13: Automated Software Engineering
November 11 - 15, 2013
CA, Silicon Valley, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 82 of 337 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)High-performance Deterministic Concurrency Using Lingua FrancaACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization10.1145/361768720:4(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Code Coverage Criteria for Asynchronous ProgramsProceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3611643.3616292(1307-1319)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
  • (2020)Actor concurrency bugs: a comprehensive study on symptoms, root causes, API usages, and differencesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/34282824:OOPSLA(1-32)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2020
  • (2020)A Delta-Debugging Approach to Assessing the Resilience of Actor Programs through Run-time Test PerturbationsProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on Automation of Software Test10.1145/3387903.3389303(21-30)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2020
  • (2019)Trace aware random testing for distributed systemsProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/33606063:OOPSLA(1-29)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Randomized testing of distributed systems with probabilistic guaranteesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/32765302:OOPSLA(1-28)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2018
  • (2018)Two-Phase Dynamic Analysis of Message-Passing Go Programs Based on Vector ClocksProceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming10.1145/3236950.3236959(1-13)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2018
  • (2018)A Comprehensive Study on Bugs in Actor SystemsProceedings of the 47th International Conference on Parallel Processing10.1145/3225058.3225139(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2018
  • (2018)A Survey of Recent Trends in Testing Concurrent Software SystemsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.270708944:8(747-783)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2018
  • (2017)Systematic black-box analysis of collaborative web applicationsACM SIGPLAN Notices10.1145/3140587.306236452:6(171-184)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media