Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

An analytical comparison of some rule-learning programs

Published: 01 November 1985 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. An analytical comparison of some rule-learning programs

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Kathleen M. Swigger

      This paper attempts to develop a theoretical framework for the field of machine learning, specifically rule-learning programs. The authors accomplish this task by analyzing and comparing several AI programs in an effort to extract an algorithmic classification of techniques for rule-learning; to identify their range; to locate their flaws; to establish the relationship between them; and to extend their range. More specifically, the authors examine the work of Brazdil (ELM), Langley (AMBER), Mitchell et al. (LEX), Quinlan (ID3), Shapiro (MIS), Waterman (P), and an extension of Winston's work made by Young, Plotkin, and Linz. To aid in this comparison, the authors discuss the various AI programs using a uniform notation. By using this formalism, the reader is able to get a very clear idea of how the various systems differ (and are the same) in their approach and implementations. The authors have identified the following rule-learning techniques: criticism techniques, conjunctive modification techniques, disjunctive modification techniques, rule-creation techniques, and description space modification. This classification differs markedly from that of Smith et al. [1], who concentrate on the architecture of learning programs, and a more descriptive survey that appears in [2]. Although the authors clearly delineate how the systems fit into these classifications, they are best in their discussion of the differences between Focusing and the Candidate Elimination Algorithm, both conjunctive learning techniques. This is, perhaps, the most insightful section in the entire paper. By explaining how the two methods treat the same problem, the authors are able to demonstrate how the methods differ with respect to rule modification. It would have been nice if this same clarity of explanation had been carried over to the “Creating New Rules” section. Understandably, such a task might have required an entire book. Artificial Intelligence is a young science that desperately needs scholars who are willing to synthesize and analyze its paradigms. This paper analyzes various algorithms used in machine learning. Thus, it makes a very vital contribution to both the specific field of Artificial Intelligence and to the broader area of Computer Science.

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      Publisher

      Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.

      United Kingdom

      Publication History

      Published: 01 November 1985

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Inductive learningJournal of Computer Science and Technology10.1007/BF029394748:2(118-132)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2023
      • (1997)Generalized Version Space Learning Algorithm for Noisy and Uncertain DataIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/69.5914579:2(336-340)Online publication date: 1-Mar-1997
      • (1996)Handling Discovered Structure in Database SystemsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/69.4941638:2(227-240)Online publication date: 1-Apr-1996
      • (1995)Forgetting and compacting data in concept learningProceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 110.5555/1625855.1625912(432-438)Online publication date: 20-Aug-1995
      • (1994)Learning Concepts in Parallel Based Upon the Strategy of Version SpaceIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/69.3348776:6(857-867)Online publication date: 1-Dec-1994
      • (1990)Netman: a learning network traffic controllerProceedings of the 3rd international conference on Industrial and engineering applications of artificial intelligence and expert systems - Volume 210.1145/98894.99101(923-931)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1990
      • (1990)Matching interval-valued-argument propositions in rule-based systemsProceedings of the 1990 ACM annual conference on Cooperation10.1145/100348.100400(343-350)Online publication date: 1-Jan-1990
      • (1990)LEWIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/34.4905412:3(294-308)Online publication date: 1-Mar-1990
      • (1989)Compiling rules from constraint satisfaction problem solvingACM SIGART Bulletin10.1145/63266.63307(177-178)Online publication date: 1-Apr-1989
      • (1989)Coping with ongoing knowledge acquisition from collaborating hierarchies of expertsACM SIGART Bulletin10.1145/63266.63302(170-171)Online publication date: 1-Apr-1989
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media