Digitalization and country distance in international trade: : An empirical analysis of European countries
Authors: 
Thuy Linh Cao, Judy HsuAuthors Info & Claims
References
[1]
M. Aghaei, M. Rezagholizadeh, The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on economic growth in the OIC countries, Economic and Environmental Studies 17 (2) (2017) 257–278.
[2]
I. Ahmedov, The impact of digital economy on international trade, European Journal of Business and Management Research 5 (4) (2020) 1–7.
[3]
I.C. Alvarez, J. Barbero, A. Rodríguez-Pose, J.L. Zofío, Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in A sectoral trade framework, World Development 103 (2018) 72–87.
[4]
E. Autio, R. Mudambi, Y. Yoo, Digitalization and globalization in A turbulent world: Centrifugal and centripetal forces, Global Strategy Journal 11 (1) (2021) 3–16.
[5]
K. Beck, Intra-vs inter-industry trade: A robust analysis of the determinants of the different trade types, in: Economic and social development: Book of proceedings, 2018, pp. 118–126.
[6]
H. Berry, M. Guillen, N. Zhou, An institutional approach to cross-national distance, Journal of International Business Studies 41 (9) (2010) 1460–1480.
[7]
S. Beugelsdijk, B. Ambos, P.C. Nell, Conceptualizing and measuring distance in international business research: Recurring questions and best practice guidelines, in: L. Eden, B. Nielsen, A. Verbeke (Eds.), Research methods in international business, Journal of International Business Studies Special Collections, 2020.
[8]
P.J. Buckley, M.C. Casson, The multinational enterprise in the world economy, in: The Future of the multinational enterprise (1-31), Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1976.
[9]
P.J. Buckley, A. Cross, H. Tan, X. Liu, H. Voss, Historic and emergent trends in Chinese outward direct investment, in: Foreign direct investment, China and the world economy, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010, pp. 119–162.
[10]
J.T. Campbell, L. Eden, S.R. Miller, Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter?, Journal of International Business Studies 43 (1) (2012) 84–106.
[11]
J.C. Casillas, F.J. Acedo, Speed in the internationalization process of the firm, International Journal of Management Reviews 15 (1) (2013) 15–29.
[12]
S.T. Cavusgil, G. Knight, The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization, Journal of International Business Studies 46 (2015) 3–16.
[13]
T. Chaney, The gravity equation in international trade: An explanation, Journal of Political Economy 126 (1) (2018) 150–177.
[14]
Y.C. Chang, S.W. Polachek, J. Robst, Conflict and trade: The relationship between geographic distance and international interactions, The Journal of Socio-Economics 33 (4) (2004) 491–509.
[15]
Z. Chong, C. Qin, S. Pan, The evolution of the Belt and Road trade network and its determinant factors, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (14) (2019) 3166–3177.
[16]
X. Clark, D. Dollar, A. Micco, Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade, Journal of Development Economics 75 (2) (2004) 417–450.
[17]
N. Coviello, L. Kano, P.W. Liesch, AdaptingThe uppsala model to A modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations, Journal of International Business Studies 48 (9) (2017) 1151–1164.
[18]
T.L. Cyrus, Culture and trade in the European union, Journal of Economic Integration 30 (2) (2015) 206–239.
[19]
M. Czinkota, I. Ronkainen, M. Moffett, International business, 10th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2019.
[20]
H.L. De Groot, G.J. Linders, P. Rietveld, U. Subramanian, The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns, Kyklos 57 (1) (2004) 103–123.
[21]
A.C. Disdier, K. Head, The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade, The Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (1) (2008) 37–48.
[22]
D. Dow, A note on psychological distance and export market selection, Journal of International Marketing 8 (1) (2000) 51–64.
[23]
D. Dow, A. Karunaratna, Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli, Journal of International Business Studies 37 (5) (2006) 578–602.
[24]
J. Dunning, Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests, Journal of International Business Studies 11 (1980) 9–31.
[25]
M. Eling, M. Lehmann, The impact of digitalization on the insurance value chain and the insurability of risks, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice 43 (3) (2018) 359–396.
[26]
M. Falk, High-tech exports and economic growth in industrialized countries, Applied Economics Letters 16 (10–12) (2009) 1025–1028.
[27]
J. Frankel, A. Rose, An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (2) (2002) 437–466.
[28]
G. Gereffi, What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies, Journal of International Business Policy 3 (2020) 287–301.
[29]
P. Ghemawat, Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion, Harvard Business Review 79 (8) (2001) 137–140. 142.
[30]
E. Gomez-Herrera, B. Martens, G. Turlea, The drivers and impediments for cross-border E-commerce in the EU, Information Economics and Policy 28 (2014) 83–96.
[31]
R. Guo, How culture influence foreign trade: Evidence from the U.S. And China, The Journal of Socio-Economics 33 (6) (2004) 785–812.
[32]
F. Habibi, M.A. Zabardast, Digitalization, education and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Middle East and OECD countries, Technology in Society 63 (2020).
[33]
J. Hagberg, M. Sundstrom, N. Egels-Zandén, The digitalization of retailing: An exploratory framework, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 44 (7) (2016) 694–712.
[34]
G. Hofstede, Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1) (2011) 2307. 0919.
[35]
T.J. Holmes, J.J. Stevens, Exports, borders, distances, and plant size, Journal of International Economics 8 (1) (2012) 91–103.
[36]
T. Hutzschenreuter, I. Kleindienst, S. Lange, The concept of distance in international business research: A review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (2) (2015) 160–179.
[37]
S.H. Hymer, The international operations of national firms: Study of direct foreign investment, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1976.
[38]
I.E. Isphording, S. Otten, The costs of babylon—linguistic distance in applied economics, Review of International Economics 21 (2) (2013) 354–369.
[39]
G. Jackson, R. Deeg, Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business, Journal of International Business Studies 39 (4) (2008) 540–561.
[40]
K. Katsikeas, L. Leonidou, A. Zeriti, Revisiting international marketing strategy in A digital era: Opportunities, challenges, and research directions, International Marketing Review 37 (3) (2019) 405–424.
[41]
T.Y. Kim, R. Dekker, C. Heij, Cross-border electronic commerce: Distance effects and express delivery in European union markets, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 21 (2) (2017) 184–218.
[42]
H.Y. Kim, M. Jensen, Audience heterogeneity and the effectiveness of market signals: How to overcome liabilities of foreignness in film exports?, Academy of Management Journal 57 (5) (2014) 1360–1384.
[43]
T.H. Le, Does economic distance affect the flows of trade and foreign direct investment? Evidence from vietnam, Cogent Economics & Finance 5 (1) (2017).
[44]
A. Lendle, M. Olarreaga, S. Schropp, P.L. Vézina, There goes gravity: Ebay and the death of distance, The Economic Journal 126 (591) (2016) 406–441.
[45]
J. Li, L. Chen, J. Yi, J. Mao, J. Liao, Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce, Journal of International Business Studies 50 (2019) 1448–1463.
[46]
G.J.M. Linders, A. Slangen, H. De Groot, S. Beugelsdijk, Cultural and institutional determinants of bilateral trade flows (No. 05-074/3), Tinbergen Institute, 2005.
[47]
J. Lohmann, Do Language barriers affect trade?, Economics Letters 110 (2) (2011) 159–162.
[48]
J. Lu, X. Liu, M. Wright, I. Filatotchev, International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions, Journal of International Business Studies 45 (4) (2014) 428–449.
[49]
O. Machekhina, Digital of education as A trend of its modernization and reforming, Revista Espacios 38 (40) (2017) 26–31.
[50]
G. Magnani, A. Zucchella, D.E. Floriani, The logic behind foreign market selection: Objective distance dimensions vs. Strategic objectives and psychic distance, International Business Review 27 (1) (2018) 1–20.
[51]
V. Maksimov, Y. Luo, International springboard as an entrepreneurial act, Journal of World Business 56 (3) (2021).
[52]
R. Maseland, D. Dow, P. Steel, The kogut and singh national cultural distance index: Time to start using it as A springboard rather than a crutch, Journal of International Business Studies 49 (9) (2018) 1154–1166.
[53]
L. Maxwell, T. McCain, Gateway or gatekeeper: The implications of copyright and digitalization on education, Communication Education 46 (3) (1997) 141–157.
[54]
H. Miloloža, Differences between Croatia and EU candidate countries: The CAGE distance framework, International Journal of the Society for Advancing Business and Information Technology 6 (2) (2015) 52–62.
[55]
K. Miura, K. Takechi, Institutional quality and homogeneity, and types of international transactions, Journal of International Economic Studies 28 (2014) 3–15.
[56]
B.B. Nielsen, C.G. Asmussen, C.D. Weatherall, The location choice of foreign direct investments: Empirical evidence and methodological challenges, Journal of World Business 52 (1) (2017) 62–82.
[57]
P. Norris, The digital divide, in: The information society reader, Routledge, 2020, pp. 273–286.
[58]
N. Prime, C. Obadia, I. Vida, Psychic distance in exporter–importer relationships: A grounded theory approach, International Business Review 18 (2) (2009) 184–198.
[59]
R. Resciniti, M. Matarazzo, G. Baima, Consumers' reactions to cross-border acquisitions: The role of psychic distance and acquirer's corporate reputation, British Food Journal 122 (2) (2019) 655–677.
[60]
D. Roodman, How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in stata, STATA Journal 9 (1) (2009) 86–136.
[61]
A.M. Rugman, A. Verbeke, Location, competitiveness, and the multinational enterprise, The Oxford Handbook of International Business, 2001.
[62]
A.M. Rugman, A. Verbeke, A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (2004) 3–18.
[63]
K. Sabbagh, R. Friedrich, B. El-Darwiche, M. Singh, A. Koster, Digitization for economic growth and job creation: Regional and industry perspectives, The Global Information and Technology Report (2013) 35–42.
[64]
N.A. Shaheer, S. Li, The CAGE around cyberspace? How digital innovations internationalize in A virtual world, Journal of Business Venturing 35 (1) (2020).
[65]
O. Shenkar, Beyond cultural distance: Switching to A friction lens in the study of cultural differences, Journal of International Business Studies 43 (1) (2012) 12–17.
[66]
O. Shenkar, S.B. Tallman, H. Wang, J. Wu, National culture and international business: A path forward, Journal of International Business Studies (2020) 1–18.
[67]
J. Srai, H. Lorentz, Developing design principles for the digitalisation of purchasing and supply management, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 25 (1) (2019) 78–98.
[68]
V. Stojkoski, P. Koch, E. Coll, C.A. Hidalgo, Estimating digital product trade through corporate revenue data, Nature Communication 15 (1) (2024) 5262.
[69]
B. Tadesse, R. White, Does cultural distance hinder trade in goods? A comparative study of nine OECD member nations, Open Economies Review 21 (2) (2010) 237–261.
[70]
B. Tadesse, R. White, Z. Huang, Does China's trade defy cultural barriers?, International Review of Applied Economics 31 (3) (2017) 398–428.
[71]
K. Tokas, A.K. Deb, CAGE distance framework and bilateral trade flows: Case of India, Management Research Review 43 (10) (2020) 1157–1181.
[72]
E.W. Tsang, P.S. Yip, Economic distance and the survival of foreign direct investments, Academy of Management Journal 50 (5) (2007) 1156–1168.
[73]
UNCTAD (2021): Pandemic drives ICT goods trade rebound but steep declines occur in least developed countries and africa, 2 November.
[74]
G.F. Watson, S. Weaven, H. Perkins, D. Sardana, R.W. Palmatier, International market entry strategies: Relational, digital, and hybrid approaches, Journal of International Marketing 26 (1) (2018) 30–60.
[75]
Y. Yang, H. Liu, X. Li, The world is flatter? Examining the relationship between cultural distance and international tourist flows, Journal of Travel Research 58 (2) (2019) 224–240.
[76]
G. Yip, A.M. Dempster, Using the internet to enhance global strategy, European Management Journal 23 (1) (2005) 1–13.
[77]
S. Zaheer, M.S. Schomaker, L. Nachum, Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to A much-loved construct, Journal of International Business Studies 43 (1) (2012) 18–27.
Index Terms
- Digitalization and country distance in international trade: An empirical analysis of European countries
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies
AbstractThis paper examines the contribution of digitalization to economic growth of Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) in comparison with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) economies. The main reason for comparing the most ...
Highlights- Examines the contribution of digitalization to economic growth of Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) in comparison with the OECD economies.
Effects of China's Outward FDI on Domestic Employment
DCABES '11: Proceedings of the 2011 10th International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications to Business, Engineering and ScienceWith the improvement of international competitiveness of Chinese economy and the implementation of going global strategy, China's outward FDI has developed quickly. This paper explores the effects of China's outward FDI on domestic employment by ...
Lopsided effects of telecom reforms on mobile markets in the enlarged EU: Evidence from dynamic quantile model
AbstractThe European Union (EU) has recently been significantly enlarged with addition of ten countries, almost all from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). This was expected to enhance the performance of the mobile telecommunications industry ...
Highlights- The study investigates how EU generalized and imposed reforms affect mobile telecommunications performance.
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Elsevier Ltd.
Publisher
Pergamon Press, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 March 2025
Author Tags
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025