Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

A network evolution model based on community structure

Published: 30 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Social networks are human-centered relationship communities. The research about social networks has an impact on the people's daily life. In this paper, we observe the social networks based on the DBLP and Facebook datasets and confirm that the medium-scale community has a star-shaped structure and a core structure with high-connectivity and small diameter in the social networks. At the same time, we find that community merging depends largely on the clustering coefficient of the graph composed of nodes that connect two communities directly, and community splitting is largely decided by the clustering coefficient of this community.

References

[1]
S. Milgram, The small world problem, Psychol. Today, 2 (1967) 60-67.
[2]
D. Watts, S. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of small world networks, Nature, 393 (1998) 440-442.
[3]
A. Barabási, R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286 (1999) 509.
[4]
J. Leskovec, K. Lang, A. Dasgupta, M. Mahoney, Statistical properties of community structure in large social and information networks, in: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM., 2008, pp. 695-704.
[5]
A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. Gummadi, P. Druschel, B. Bhattacharjee, Measurement and analysis of online social networks, in: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement., 2007, pp. 29-42.
[6]
T. Guan, Y. He, J. Gao, J. Yang, J. Yu, On-device mobile visual location recognition by integrating vision and inertial sensors, IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 15 (2013) 1688-1699.
[7]
S. White, P. Smyth, Algorithms for estimating relative importance in networks, in: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining., 2003, pp. 266-275.
[8]
Y. Li, C. Lai, C. Chen, Identifying bloggers with marketing influence in the blogosphere, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM., 2009, pp. 335-340.
[9]
T. Guan, Y.F. He, L.Y. Duan, J.Q. Yu, Efficient BOF generation and compression for on-device mobile visual location recognition, IEEE Multimedia, 21 (2014) 32-41.
[10]
J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, A. Tomkins, Microscopic evolution of social networks, in: Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining., 2008, 462-470.
[11]
Y. Lin, Y. Chi, S. Zhu, H. Sundaram, B. Tseng, Analyzing communities and their evolutions in dynamic social networks, ACM Trans. Knowledge Discov. Data (TKDD), 3 (2009) 1-31.
[12]
Benchang Wei, T.a.o. Guan, Junqing Yu, Projected residual vector quantization for ANN search, IEEE Multimedia, 21 (2014) 41-51.
[13]
R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, D. Sivakumar, A. Tomkins, E. Upfal, Stochastic models for the web graph, in: . Foundations of Computer Science, 2000. IEEE Proceedings. 41st Annual Symposium on. ; 2002, pp. 57-65.
[14]
E. Jin, M. Girvan, M. Newman, Structure of growing social networks, Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2001) 46132.
[15]
X. Li, G. Chen, A local-world evolving network model, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl., 328 (2003) 274-286.
[16]
B. Viswanath, A. Mislove, M. Cha, K. Gummadi, On the evolution of user interaction in facebook, in: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks, ACM. ; 2009, pp. 37-42.
[17]
X.F. Wang, X. Li, G.R. Chen, Theory and Application of Complex Networks, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2006.
[18]
M. Newman, Assortative mixing in networks, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89 (2002) 208701.
[19]
F. Rodrigues, G. Travieso, V. Boas, Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements, Adv. Phys., 56 (2007) 167-242.
[20]
H.B. Hu, L. Wang, A brief history of power law distributions, Physics, 34 (2005) 889-896.
[21]
R. Albert, A. Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys., 74 (2002) 47-97.
[22]
J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, C. Faloutsos, Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations, in: Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining., 2005, pp. 177-187.
[23]
S. Asur, S. Parthasarathy, D. Ucar, An event-based framework for characterizing the evolutionary behavior of interaction graphs, ACM Trans. Knowledge Discov. Data (TKDD), 3 (2009) 1-36.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Effects of ego networks and communities on self-disclosure in an online social networkProceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1145/3341161.3342881(17-24)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Neurocomputing
Neurocomputing  Volume 168, Issue C
November 2015
1211 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 30 November 2015

Author Tags

  1. Community evolution
  2. Network classification
  3. Network structure
  4. Social networks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Effects of ego networks and communities on self-disclosure in an online social networkProceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1145/3341161.3342881(17-24)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2019

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media