Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

The consistency among facilitating factors and ERP implementation success: A holistic view of fit

Published: 01 September 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Traditionally, various ERP implementation factors have been deemed critical to success within diverse business environments. The interaction relationships among these ERP implementation success factors, however, have been overlooked. The objective of this study is to explore the interaction patterns among the ERP implementation success factors from a covariation (co-alignment) perspective. We conceptualize the ''consistency'' among the factors that facilitate ERP implementation and evaluate them in terms of their positive impact on successful ERP implementation. The results from a field survey of 90 Taiwanese manufacturing firms show that the ''consistency'' among these facilitating factors of ERP implementation had a significant positive impact on ERP implementation success. The factors examined in this study include vendor support, consultant competence, ERP project team member competence, ERP project manager leadership, top management support, and user support. Implications for managers and researchers conclude this study.

References

[1]
Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical successful factors. European Journal of Information Systems. v11. 35-46.
[2]
Allen, D., Kern, T., Havenhand, M., 2002. ERP critical success factors: an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector institutions. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference, pp. 3062-3071.
[3]
Enterprise resource planning: a taxonomy of critical factors. European Journal of Operational Research. v146. 352-364.
[4]
Critical success factors in implementing MRP and government assistance. Information and Management. v29. 63-70.
[5]
EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software Inc., Encino, CA.
[6]
Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives. Omega. v29. 125-142.
[7]
Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management. v16. 7-14.
[8]
Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly. v25 i1. 1-16.
[9]
Information technology planning in the 1990s: directions for practice and research. MIS Quarterly. v11 i1. 59-71.
[10]
Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. v4 i3. 205-225.
[11]
Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. MIS Quarterly. v18 i4. 371-403.
[12]
Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research. v8. 125-150.
[13]
Leadership and the project-management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management. v13. 83-88.
[14]
Common Wealth 1000 Largest Firms. Common Wealth Publisher, Taiwan.
[15]
Performance outcomes of strategic and IT competencies alignment. Journal of Information Technology. v19. 178-190.
[16]
Integrating the content and process of strategic MIS planning with competitive strategy. Decision Sciences. v22 i5. 953-984.
[17]
Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review. v76. 121-131.
[18]
Cultural complications of ERP. Communications of the ACM. v45 i7. 109-111.
[19]
Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research. v3. 60-95.
[20]
The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a 10-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems. v19. 9-30.
[21]
Information systems planning in small business: a stages of growth analysis. Journal of Systems and Software. v33 i2. 189-201.
[22]
Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. v30 i4. 14-39.
[23]
Experiences in strategic information systems planning. MIS Quarterly. v17. 1-24.
[24]
Enterprise resource planning systems research: an annotated bibliography. Communications of AIS. v7 i8. 1-52.
[25]
ERP implementation: a compilation and analysis of critical success factors. Business Process Management Journal. v13 i3. 329-347.
[26]
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research. v18 i2. 39-50.
[27]
Consultant engagement for computer system selection: a pro-active client role in small businesses. Information and Management. v20. 83-93.
[28]
Gable, G.G., Sedera, D., Chan, T., 2003. Enterprise systems success: a measurement model. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington, USA, pp. 576-591.
[29]
A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems. Computers in Industry. v56. 510-522.
[30]
Why new technologies fail?. Industrial Management. v41. 29-34.
[31]
Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal. v32. 4-16.
[32]
A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software. v16. 30-36.
[33]
The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information and Management. v40. 25-40.
[34]
The enterprise resource planning system as a strategic solution. Information Strategy Executive Journal. v15 i4. 28-33.
[35]
Project risk impact on software development team performance. Project Management Journal. v31. 19-26.
[36]
Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
[37]
Seeking consonance in information systems. Journal of Systems and Software. v56. 195-202.
[38]
Information resource planning: overcoming difficulties in identifying top management's objectives. MIS Quarterly. v11 i3. 389-399.
[39]
The relationship between procedural formalization in MIS development and MIS success: a contingent analysis. Information and Management. v22 i2. 89-111.
[40]
Coping with ERP-related contextual issues in SMEs: a vendor's perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. v13 i4. 399-415.
[41]
Enterprise resource planning: managing the implementation process. European Journal of Operational Research. v146 i2. 302-314.
[42]
Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM. v26. 430-444.
[43]
Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science. v34. 583-598.
[44]
Multisite ERP implementations. Communications of the ACM. v43. 42-46.
[45]
Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin. v97. 562-582.
[46]
An ERP strategy. Fortune. v2. 95-97.
[47]
Factors for consulting engagement success. Management Decision. v37. 394-402.
[48]
Toward a new contingency approach: the search for organizational gestalts. Journal of Management Studies. v18 i1. 1-26.
[49]
Successful implementation of ERP projects: evidence from two case studies. International Journal of Production Economics. v75 i1-2. 83-96.
[50]
ERP implementation: chief information officers' perceptions of critical success factors. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. v16 i1. 5-22.
[51]
Enterprise Resource Planning: Systems, Life cycle, Electronic Commerce, and Risk. Cambridge University Press, New York.
[52]
Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research. v2. 143-169.
[53]
Organizational characteristics and information systems planning: an empirical study. Information Systems Research. v5. 75-109.
[54]
Information processing view of organizations: an exploratory examination of fit in the context of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems. v22 i1. 257-294.
[55]
Improving software project management. Journal of Systems and Software. v13. 231-235.
[56]
Critical success factors for successful implementation of enterprise resource planning systems in manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Business Information Systems. v2 i3. 276-297.
[57]
Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly. v20. 55-77.
[58]
Critical success factors for implementing enterprise portals: a comparison with ERP implementations. Business Process Management Journal. v13 i4. 538-552.
[59]
Utilizing knowledge links in the implementation of system development methodologies. Information and Software Technology. v43. 635-640.
[60]
Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of Management Information Systems. v19 i1. 17-46.
[61]
An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success. Information and Management. v31. 103-118.
[62]
Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation. Information and Management. v40. 813-829.
[63]
Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications of the ACM. v45. 74-81.
[64]
National differences and ERP implementation: issues and challenges. Omega. v32 i5. 361-371.
[65]
Success factors in ERP systems implementations: lessons from practice. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. v19 i4. 418-433.
[66]
Somers, T.M., Nelson, K., 2001. The impact of critical success factors across the stages of enterprise resource planning implementations. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1-10.
[67]
Stewart, G., Milford, M., Jewels, T., Hunter, T., Hunter, B., 2000. Organizational readiness for ERP implementation. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 10-13.
[68]
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision Sciences. v33. 601-628.
[69]
Enterprise application suites are becoming a focal point of business and technology planning. Information Week. v704. 42-43.
[70]
Linking the information technology structure with organizational competitive strategy: a survey. MIS Quarterly. v13 i3. 309-317.
[71]
Leadership styles in information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management. v18. 235-241.
[72]
Engagement of external expertise in information systems implementation. Journal of Management Information Systems. v11 i2. 209-231.
[73]
Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small business. Information Systems Research. v7. 248-267.
[74]
The concept of contingency beyond "It depends": illustrations from IS research stream. Information and Management. v40. 551-562.
[75]
Avoiding ERP implementation failure. Industrial Management. v44. 24-33.
[76]
Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research. v146. 241-257.
[77]
The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review. v14. 423-444.
[78]
Performance implications of strategic coalignment: a methodological perspective. Journal of Management Studies. v27. 19-41.
[79]
Exploring the concept of 'fit' in strategic management. Academy of Management Review. v9 i3. 513-525.
[80]
Environment-strategy co-alignment: an empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal. v11 i1. 1-23.
[81]
Volkoff, O., 1999. Using the structurational model of technology to analyze and ERP implementation. In: Proceedings of the Academy of Management'99 Conference.
[82]
Volkoff, O., Sawyer, S., 2001. ERP implementation teams, consultants, and information sharing. In: Proceedings of the Seventh America Conference on Information Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 1043-1045.
[83]
Effects of internal support and consultant quality on the consulting process and ERP system quality. Decision Support Systems. v42 i2. 1029-1041.
[84]
An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems. v6 i1. 59-85.
[85]
ERP implementation and project management. Production and Inventory Management Journal. v42. 75-80.
[86]
The role of the CIO and IT function in ERP. Communications of the ACM. v43. 32-38.
[87]
A framework of ERP systems implementation success in China: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics. v98 i1. 56-80.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)The Impacts of the Quality Dimensions of the ERP System on the Realization of the Fundamental Business Objectives and Perceived UsefulnessInternational Journal of Enterprise Information Systems10.4018/IJEIS.201810010714:4(89-107)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018
  • (2017)Assessing Organizational Readiness for Implementing ERP System Using Fuzzy Expert System ApproachInternational Journal of Enterprise Information Systems10.4018/IJEIS.201701010513:1(67-85)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
  • (2017)Antecedents of ERP assimilation and its impact on ERP valueInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-015-9583-019:1(13-30)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software  Volume 81, Issue 9
September, 2008
183 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 2008

Author Tags

  1. Consistency
  2. ERP implementation
  3. Enterprise systems
  4. Project management
  5. Second-order factor model

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)The Impacts of the Quality Dimensions of the ERP System on the Realization of the Fundamental Business Objectives and Perceived UsefulnessInternational Journal of Enterprise Information Systems10.4018/IJEIS.201810010714:4(89-107)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018
  • (2017)Assessing Organizational Readiness for Implementing ERP System Using Fuzzy Expert System ApproachInternational Journal of Enterprise Information Systems10.4018/IJEIS.201701010513:1(67-85)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
  • (2017)Antecedents of ERP assimilation and its impact on ERP valueInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-015-9583-019:1(13-30)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017
  • (2016)The Fit between External Involvement and Business EnvironmentInternational Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management10.4018/IJISSCM.20160701039:3(46-64)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016
  • (2016)The role of absorptive capacity, communication and trust in ERP adoptionJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.025119:C(58-69)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
  • (2015)A Review of User Involvement in Information System ProjectsInternational Journal of Information Technology Project Management10.4018/ijitpm.20150101026:1(26-53)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015
  • (2015)Evaluating ERP Projects with multi-attribute decision support systemsComputers in Industry10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.00473:C(93-104)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
  • (2014)An Extended Framework for ERP Post-Implementation Success AssessmentInformation Resources Management Journal10.4018/irmj.201410010327:4(45-65)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014
  • (2014)Reframing success and failure of information systemsMIS Quarterly10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.1138:2(561-586)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014
  • (2014)Mobile-Health Tool Use and Community Health Worker Performance in the Kenyan ContextProceedings of the Southern African Institute for Computer Scientist and Information Technologists Annual Conference 2014 on SAICSIT 2014 Empowered by Technology10.1145/2664591.2664628(229-240)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media