Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Compressive VOF method with skewness correction to capture sharp interfaces on arbitrary meshes

Published: 15 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The accurate and efficient modelling of two-phase flows is at present mostly limited to structured, unskewed meshes, due to the additional topological and numerical complexity of arbitrary, unstructured meshes. Compressive VOF methods which discretize the interface advection with algebraic differencing schemes are computationally efficient and inherently applicable to arbitrary meshes. However, compressive VOF methods evidently suffer severely from numerical diffusion on meshes with topological skewness. In this paper we present a compressive VOF method using a state-of-the-art donor-acceptor advection scheme which includes novel modifications to substantially reduce numerical diffusion on arbitrary meshes without adding computational complexity. The new methodology accurately captures evolving interfaces on any arbitrary, non-overlapping mesh and conserves mass within the limits of the applied solver tolerance. A thorough validation of the presented methods is conducted, examining the pure advection of the interface indicator function as well as the application to evolving interfaces with surface tension. Crucially, the results on equidistant Cartesian and arbitrary tetrahedral meshes are shown to be comparable and accurate.

References

[1]
C. Hirt, B. Nichols, Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries, J. Comput. Phys., 39 (1981) 201-225.
[2]
B. Lafaurie, C. Nardone, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, G. Zanetti, Modelling merging and fragmentation in multiphase flows with SURFER, J. Comput. Phys., 113 (1994) 134-147.
[3]
O. Ubbink, R. Issa, A method for capturing sharp fluid interfaces on arbitrary meshes, J. Comput. Phys., 153 (1999) 26-50.
[4]
M. Darwish, F. Moukalled, Convective schemes for capturing interfaces of free-surface flows on unstructured grids, Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, Fundam., 49 (2006) 19-42.
[5]
S. Muzaferija, M. Perić, P. Sames, P. Schellin, A two-fluid Navier-Stokes solver to simulate water entry, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, 1999, pp. 638-649.
[6]
D.L. Youngs, Time-dependent multi-material flow with large fluid distortion, in: Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp. 273.
[7]
W.J. Rider, D.B. Kothe, Reconstructing volume tracking, J. Comput. Phys., 141 (1998) 112-152.
[8]
B. van Wachem, J. Schouten, Experimental validation of 3-D Lagrangian VOF model: bubble shape and rise velocity, AIChE J., 48 (2002) 2744-2753.
[9]
J.E. Pilliod, E.G. Puckett, Second-order accurate volume-of-fluid algorithms for tracking material interfaces, J. Comput. Phys., 199 (2004) 465-502.
[10]
E. Aulisa, S. Manservisi, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, Interface reconstruction with least-squares fit and split advection in three-dimensional Cartesian geometry, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007) 2301-2319.
[11]
J. López, J. Hernández, Analytical and geometrical tools for 3D volume of fluid methods in general grids, J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008) 5939-5948.
[12]
C. Wu, D. Young, H. Wu, Simulations of multidimensional interfacial flows by an improved volume-of-fluid method, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 60 (2013) 739-755.
[13]
Y. Renardy, M. Renardy, PROST: a parabolic reconstruction of surface tension for the volume-of-fluid method, J. Comput. Phys., 183 (2002) 400-421.
[14]
T. Maric, H. Marschall, D. Bothe, voFoam - a geometrical volume of fluid algorithm on arbitrary unstructured meshes with local dynamic adaptive mesh refinement using OpenFOAM. arXiv:1305.3417
[15]
J. Mencinger, I. ¿un, A PLIC-VOF method suited for adaptive moving grids, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011) 644-663.
[16]
Z. Wang, J. Yang, F. Stern, A new volume-of-fluid method with a constructed distance function on general structured grids, J. Comput. Phys., 231 (2012) 3703-3722.
[17]
M. Huang, L. Wu, B. Chen, A piecewise linear interface-capturing volume-of-fluid method based on unstructured grids, Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, Fundam., 61 (2012) 412-437.
[18]
V.R. Gopala, B.G.M. van Wachem, Volume of fluid methods for immiscible-fluid and free-surface flows, Chem. Eng. J., 141 (2008) 204-221.
[19]
I. Park, K. Kim, J. Kim, A volume-of-fluid method for incompressible free surface flows, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 61 (2009) 1331-1362.
[20]
F. Denner, D. van der Heul, G. Oud, M. Villar, A. da Silveira Neto, B. van Wachem, Comparative study of mass-conserving interface capturing frameworks for two-phase flows with surface tension, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 61 (2014) 37-47.
[21]
O. Ubbink, Numerical prediction of two fluid systems with sharp interfaces, Imperial College London, 1997.
[22]
H. Jasak, Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flow, Imperial College London, 1996.
[23]
M. Darwish, Development and testing of a robust free-surface finite volume method, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, 2003.
[24]
F. Moukalled, M. Darwish, Transient schemes for capturing interfaces of free-surface flows, Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, Fundam., 61 (2012) 171-203.
[25]
J. Heyns, A. Malan, T. Harms, O. Oxtoby, Development of a compressive surface capturing formulation for modelling free-surface flow by using the volume-of-fluid approach, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 71 (2013) 788-804.
[26]
D. Zhang, C. Jiang, C. Yang, Y. Yang, Assessment of different reconstruction techniques for implementing the NVSF schemes on unstructured meshes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 74 (2014) 189-221.
[27]
F. Denner, B. van Wachem, Fully-coupled balanced-force VOF framework for arbitrary meshes with least-squares curvature evaluation from volume fractions, Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, Fundam., 65 (2014) 218-255.
[28]
F. Denner, Balanced-force two-phase flow modelling on unstructured and adaptive meshes, Imperial College London, 2013.
[29]
H. Rusche, Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions, Imperial College London, 2002.
[30]
Y.-Y. Tsui, S.-W. Lin, T.-T. Cheng, T.-C. Wu, Flux-blending schemes for interface capture in two-fluid flows, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 52 (2009) 5547-5556.
[31]
Y. Morinishi, T. Lund, O. Vasilyev, P. Moin, Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow, J. Comput. Phys., 143 (1998) 90-124.
[32]
J.U. Brackbill, D. Kothe, C. Zemach, Continuum method for modeling surface tension, J. Comput. Phys., 100 (1992) 335-354.
[33]
B.P. Leonard, The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 88 (1991) 17-74.
[34]
P. Gaskell, A. Lau, Curvature-compensated convective transport: SMART, a new boundedness-preserving transport algorithm, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 8 (1988) 617-641.
[35]
H. Jasak, H. Weller, A. Gosman, High resolution NVD differencing scheme for arbitrarily unstructured meshes, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 31 (1999) 431-449.
[36]
I. Demird'ić, S. Muzaferija, Numerical method for coupled fluid flow, heat transfer and stress analysis using unstructured moving meshes with cells of arbitrary topology, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 125 (1995) 235-255.
[37]
S. Mathur, J. Murthy, A pressure-based method for unstructured meshes, Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, Fundam., 31 (1997) 195-215.
[38]
F. Juretić, A. Gosman, Error analysis of the finite-volume method with respect to mesh type, Numer. Heat Transf., Part B, Fundam., 57 (2010) 414-439.
[39]
M. Rudman, Volume-tracking methods for interfacial flows calculations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 24 (1997) 671-691.
[40]
O. Lebaigue, C. Duquennoy, S. Vincent, Test-case No 1: rise of a spherical cap bubble in a stagnant liquid (PN), in: Validation of Advanced Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow, Begell House Inc., 2005, pp. 260.
[41]
M. Pivello, M. Villar, R. Serfaty, A. Roma, A. Silveira-Neto, A fully adaptive front tracking method for the simulation of two phase flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 58 (2014) 72-82.
[42]
D. Bhaga, M. Weber, Bubbles in viscous liquids: shapes, wakes and velocities, J. Fluid Mech., 105 (1981) 61-85.
[43]
J. Hua, J. Stene, P. Lin, Numerical simulation of 3D bubbles rising in viscous liquids using a front tracking method, J. Comput. Phys., 227 (2008) 3358-3382.
[44]
M. Jemison, E. Loch, M. Sussman, M. Shashkov, M. Arienti, M. Ohta, Y. Wang, A coupled level set-moment of fluid method for incompressible two-phase flows, J. Sci. Comput., 54 (2012) 454-491.
[45]
F. Denner, B. van Wachem, On the convolution of fluid properties and surface force for interface capturing methods, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 54 (2013) 61-64.
[46]
T.Z. Harmathy, Velocity of large drops and bubbles in media of infinite or restricted extent, AIChE J., 6 (1960) 281-288.
[47]
R. Clift, J. Grace, M. Weber, Bubbles, Drops and Particles, Academic Press, New York, 1978.
[48]
P. Lubin, S. Vincent, S. Abadie, J.-P. Caltagirone, Three-dimensional large eddy simulation of air entrainment under plunging breaking waves, Coast. Eng., 53 (2006) 631-655.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Boundedness-preserving implicit correction of mesh-induced errors for VOF based heat and mass transferJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2017.09.027352:C(285-300)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
  • (2015)TVD differencing on three-dimensional unstructured meshes with monotonicity-preserving correction of mesh skewnessJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2015.06.008298:C(466-479)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
  • (2015)Numerical time-step restrictions as a result of capillary wavesJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2015.01.021285:C(24-40)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2015
  1. Compressive VOF method with skewness correction to capture sharp interfaces on arbitrary meshes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal of Computational Physics
      Journal of Computational Physics  Volume 279, Issue C
      December 2014
      290 pages

      Publisher

      Academic Press Professional, Inc.

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 December 2014

      Author Tags

      1. Advection scheme
      2. Interface capturing
      3. Two-phase flows
      4. Unstructured meshes
      5. Volume of fluid (VOF) method

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2018)Boundedness-preserving implicit correction of mesh-induced errors for VOF based heat and mass transferJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2017.09.027352:C(285-300)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
      • (2015)TVD differencing on three-dimensional unstructured meshes with monotonicity-preserving correction of mesh skewnessJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2015.06.008298:C(466-479)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
      • (2015)Numerical time-step restrictions as a result of capillary wavesJournal of Computational Physics10.1016/j.jcp.2015.01.021285:C(24-40)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2015

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media