Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

An enhanced node segmentation and distance estimation scheme with a reduced search space boundary and improved PSO for obstacle-aware wireless sensor network localization

Published: 14 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes an enhanced method for localizing sensor nodes in wireless sensor networks with obstacles. Such environment settings lead to lower localization accuracy because locations are estimated based on detour distances circumventing the obstacles; we, therefore, improve the segmentation technique to address the issue as they divide the whole area into multiple smaller ones, each containing fewer or no obstacles. Nevertheless, when radio transmissions between sensor nodes are obstructed (as simulated by the radio irregularity model), the signal-strength variation tends to be high, reducing localization accuracy; thus, we provide a method for accurately approximating the distances between pairs of an anchor node (whose location is known) and an unknown node by incorporating the related error into the approximation process. Additionally, when the nodes with unknown locations are outside the polygon formed by the anchor nodes, the search area for localization is relatively large, resulting in lower accuracy and a longer search time; we then propose a method for reducing the size of approximation areas by forming boundaries based on the two intersection points between the ranges of two anchor nodes used to localize an unknown node. However, these reduced search areas could still be large; we further increase the accuracy of the PSO location estimation method by adaptively adjusting the number of particles. In addition, with PSO, the accuracy of unknown node location estimation depends on having a properly selected fitness function; therefore, we incorporate appropriate variables to reflect the distance approximation accuracy between each anchor-unknown node pair. In experiments, we measure performance in sensor node deployment areas of three different shapes: C-shaped, with 1 hole, and with 2 rectangular holes. The results show that our method provides higher localization accuracy than others in small-, medium-, and large-scaled WSNs. Specifically, our proposed method is 27.46%, 49.28%, 50.33%, and 74.62% more accurate on average than IDE-NSL, PSO–C, min-max PSO, and niching PSO, respectively.

References

[1]
P. Aiping, G. Xiaosong, C. Wei, L. Haibin, A distributed localization scheme for wireless sensor networks based on bounding box algorithm, in: Proc. Of International Conference, on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, Beijing, China, 2009, pp. 984–988.
[2]
Anita, A. Yadav, AEFA: artificial electric field algorithm for global optimization, Swarm Evol. Comput. 48 (2019) 93–108.
[3]
P. Biswas, T.C. Liang, K.C. Toh, Y. Ye, T.C. Wang, Semidefinite programming approaches for sensor network localization with noisy distance measurements, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 3 (4) (2006) 360–371. (\).
[4]
L. Cheng, J. Hang, Y. Wang, Y. Bi, A fuzzy C-means and hierarchical voting BasedRSSI quantify localization method for wireless sensor network, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 47411–47422.
[5]
T.J.S. Chowdhury, C. Elkin, V. Devabhaktuni, D.B. Rawat, J. Oluoch, Advances on localization techniques for wireless sensor networks: a survey, Comput. Network. 110 (2016) 284–305.
[6]
L. Cui, C. Xu, G. Li, Z. Ming, Y. Feng, N. Lu, A high accurate localization algorithm with DV-Hop and differential evolution for wireless sensor network, Appl. Soft Comput. 68 (2018) 39–52.
[7]
H. Cui, Y. Liang, C. Zhou, N. Cao, Localization of large-scale wireless sensor networks using niching particle swarm optimization and reliable anchor selection, Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput. (2018) 18. 2018, Article ID 2473875.
[8]
A.O. de Sá, N. Nedjah, L.M. Mourelle, Distributed efficient localization in swarm robotics using Min-Max and Particle Swarm Optimization, Expert Syst. Appl. 50 (2016) 55–65.
[9]
M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, T. Stutzle, Ant colony optimization, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 1 (4) (2006) 28–39.
[10]
Gakstatter, E. (2013): RTK gnss receivers: a flooded market?. Retrieved February 14, 2020, from http://gpsworld.com/rtk-gnss-receivers-a-flooded-market/.
[11]
A. Gopakumar, L. Jacob, Localization in wireless sensor networks using particle swarm optimization, in: Proc. Of IET International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Beijing, 2008, pp. 227–230.
[12]
L. Gui, T. Val, A. Wei, R. Dalce, Improvement of range-free localization technology by a novel DV-hop protocol in wireless sensor networks, Ad Hoc Netw. 24 (2015) 55–73.
[13]
A. Guidara, G. Fersi, M.B. Jemaa, F. Derbel, A new deep learning-based distance and position estimation model for range-based indoor localization systems, Ad Hoc Netw. 114 (2021) 1570–8705.
[14]
G. Han, H. Xu, T.Q. Duong, J. Jiang, T. Hara, Localization algorithms of wireless sensor networks: a survey, Telecommun. Syst. 52 (4) (2013) 2419–2436.
[15]
M.Z. Hasan, H. Al-Rizzo, F. Al-Turjman, A survey on multipath routing protocols for QoS assurances in real-time wireless multimedia sensor networks, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19 (3) (2017) 1424–1456.
[16]
A. Kamilaris, A. Pitsillides, Mobile phone computing and the internet of Things: a survey, IEEE Internet Things J. 3 (6) (2016) 885–898.
[17]
D. Karaboga, B. Akay, A survey: algorithms simulating bee swarm intelligence, Artif. Intell. Rev. 31 (1) (2009) 68–85.
[18]
J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, International Conference on Neural Networks (1995) 167–171.
[19]
A. Kumar, A. Khosla, J.S. Saini, S. Singh, Meta-heuristic range based node localization algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks, in: Proc. Of 2012 International Conference on Localization and GNSS, Starnberg, 2012, pp. 1–7.
[20]
K. Langendoen, N. Reijers, Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: a quantitative comparison, Comput. Network. 43 (4) (2003) 499–518.
[21]
W. Liu, D. Wang, H. Jiang, W. Liu, C. Wang, An approximate convex decomposition protocol for wireless sensor network localization in arbitrary-shaped fields, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distr. Syst. 26 (12) (2015) 3264–3274.
[22]
X. Liu, S. Zhang, K.A. Bu, locality-based range-free localization algorithm for anisotropic wireless sensor networks, Telecommun. Syst. 62 (2016) 3–13.
[23]
D. Lymberopoulos, Q. Lindsey, A. Savvides, An Empirical Characterization of Radio Signal Strength Variability in 3-D IEEE 802.15.4 Networks Using Monopole Antennas, Proc. of Wireless Sensor Networks, Zurich, Switzerland, 2006, pp. 326–341.
[24]
M. Mavrovouniotis, C. Li, S. Yang, A survey of swarm intelligence for dynamic optimization: algorithms and applications, Swarm Evol. Comput. 33 (2017) 1–17.
[25]
A. Merlo, M. Migliardi, L. Caviglione, A survey on energy-aware security mechanisms, Pervasive Mob. Comput. 24 (2015) 77–90.
[26]
S. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, The whale optimization algorithm, Adv. Eng. Software 95 (2016) 51–67.
[27]
S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, Grey wolf optimizer, Adv. Eng. Software 69 (2014) 46–61.
[29]
S. Monica, G. Ferrari, Swarm intelligent approaches to auto-localization of nodes in static UWB networks, Appl. Soft Comput. 25 (2014) 426–434.
[30]
M. Naraghi-Pour, G.C. Rojas, A novel algorithm for distributed localization in wireless sensor networks, ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 11 (1) (2014) 1.
[31]
R.G. Newcomb, Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods, Stat. Med. 17 (8) (1998) 857–872.
[32]
D. Niculescu, B. Nath, DV based positioning in ad hoc networks, Telecommun. Syst. 22 (1–4) (2003) 267–280.
[33]
K. Parmar, D.C. Jinwala, Concealed data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive survey, Comput. Network. 103 (2016) 207–227.
[34]
B. Peng, L. Li, An improved localization algorithm based on genetic algorithm in wireless sensor networks, Cognitive Neurodynamics 9 (2015) 249–256.
[35]
S. Phoemphon, C. So-In, D. Niyato, A hybrid model using fuzzy logic and an extreme learning machine with vector particle swarm optimization for wireless sensor network localization, Appl. Soft Comput. 65 (2018) 101–120.
[36]
S. Phoemphon, C. So-In, N. Leelathakul, Fuzzy weighted centroid localization with virtual node approximation in wireless sensor networks, IEEE Internet Things J. 5 (6) (2018) 4728–4752.
[37]
S. Phoemphon, C. So-In, N. Leelathakul, Optimized hop A relativity for DV-hop localization in wireless sensor networks, IEEE Access 6 (2018) 78149–78172.
[38]
S. Phoemphon, C. So-In, N. Leelathakul, A hybrid localization model using node segmentation and improved particle swarm optimization with obstacle-aware for wireless sensor networks, Expert Syst. Appl. (2020) 143.
[39]
S. Phoemphon, C. So-In, N. Leelathakul, Improved distance estimation with node selection localization and particle swarm optimization for obstacle-aware wireless sensor networks, Expert Syst. Appl. (2021) (accepted for publication).
[40]
D. Qiao, G.K.H. Pang, An iteratively Reweighted Least Square algorithm for RSS-based sensor network localization, in: Proc, of IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Beijing, 2011, pp. 1085–1092.
[41]
P. Raguraman, M. Ramasundaram, V. Balakrishnan, Localization in wireless sensor networks: a dimension based pruning approach in 3D environments, Appl. Soft Comput. 68 (2018) 219–232.
[42]
Y. Shang, W. Ruml, Y. Zhang, M.P.J. Fromherz, Localization from mere connectivity, in: Proc. Of ACM Int. Symp. on Mobile Ad Hoc Network & Computing, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, 2003, pp. 201–212.
[43]
C. Shieh, V. Sai, Y. Lin, T. Lee, T. Nguyen, Q. Le, Improved node localization for WSN using heuristic optimization approaches, in: Proc. Of International Conference on Networking and Network Applications, Hakodate, 2016, pp. 95–98.
[44]
S.P. Singh, S.C. Sharma, A PSO based improved localization algorithm for wireless sensor network, Wireless Pers. Commun. 98 (2018) 487–503.
[45]
S. Singh, Shivangna, E. Mittal, Range based wireless sensor node localization using PSO and BBO and its variants, in: Proc. Of International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, Gwalior, 2013, pp. 309–315.
[46]
P. Singh, A. Khosla, A. Kumar, M. Khosla, 3D localization of moving target nodes using single anchor node in anisotropic wireless sensor networks, AEU - Int. J. Electron. Communic. 82 (2017) 543–552.
[47]
Z. Sun, M. Wei, Z. Zhang, G. Qu, Secure routing protocol based on multi-objective ant-colony-optimization for wireless sensor networks, Appl. Soft Comput. 77 (2019) 366–375.
[48]
V. Trkulja, P. Hrabač, Confidence intervals: what are they to us, medical doctors?, Croat. Med. J. 60 (4) (2019) 375–382.
[49]
Y. Venkata Lakshmi, P. Singh, M. Abouhawwash, S. Mahajan, A.K. Pandit, A.B. Ahmed, Improved chan algorithm based optimum UWB sensor node localization using hybrid particle swarm optimization, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 32546–32565.
[50]
P. Wang, G. Tu, Localization algorithm of wireless sensor network based on matrix reconstruction, Comput. Commun. 154 (2020) 216–222.
[51]
Y. Wang, X. Wu, L. Cheng, A novel non-line-of-sight indoor localization method for wireless sensor networks, J. Sens. (2018) 10,. Article ID 3715372.
[52]
W. Wang, X. Liu, M. Li, Z. Wang, C. Wang, Optimizing node localization in WirelessSensor networks based on received signal strength indicator, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 73880–73889.
[53]
Weisstein, W. Eric, Circle-Circle Intersection, 2021, www.mathworld.wolfram.com/Circle-CircleIntersection.html.
[54]
H. Xu, Semi-supervised manifold learning based on polynomial mapping for localization in wireless sensor networks, Signal Process. 172 (2020).
[55]
X.S. Yang, Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization, in: In Stochastic Algorithms: Foundations and Applications, Springer, 2009, pp. 169–178. 5792.
[56]
Y. Yao, N. Jiang, Distributed wireless sensor network localization based on weighted search, Comput. Network. 86 (2015) 57–75.
[57]
J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, D. Ghosal, Wireless sensor network survey, Comput. Network. 52 (12) (2008) 2292–2330.
[58]
W. Zhao, F. Shao, S. Ye, W. Zheng, LSRR-LA: an anisotropy-tolerant localization algorithm based on least square regularized regression for multi-hop wireless sensor networks, Sensors 18 (11) (2018) 1–17.
[59]
G. Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, J.A. Stankovic, Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks, in: Proc. Of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 2004, pp. 125–138.

Index Terms

  1. An enhanced node segmentation and distance estimation scheme with a reduced search space boundary and improved PSO for obstacle-aware wireless sensor network localization
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Journal of Network and Computer Applications
    Journal of Network and Computer Applications  Volume 221, Issue C
    Jan 2024
    446 pages

    Publisher

    Academic Press Ltd.

    United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 14 March 2024

    Author Tags

    1. Wireless sensor Networks with obstacles
    2. Localization
    3. Node segmentation
    4. Distance estimation
    5. Particle swarm optimization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media