Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

An insider perspective on community gains

Published: 01 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Community-based co-design takes place within a communal value system and opens up a new debate around the principles of participation and its benefits within HCI4D and ICTD projects. This study contributes to a current gap of expression of participants' gains, especially from an indigenous and marginalized rural communities' perspective. We have collected community viewpoints concurrently over the past five years of our longitudinal research project in rural Namibia. A number of themes have emerged out of the data as extracted by our native researcher, such as the special importance of learning technology, appreciation of the common project goal, the intrinsic pleasure of participation, frustrations about exclusions and other concerns, as well as immediate rewards and expectations of gaining resources. We acknowledge our own bias in the curation of viewpoints, and incompleteness of subjectivities while embedding our discussion within a local contextual interpretation. Through our learning from the communities we argue for a shift in perspective that acknowledges local epistemologies in HCI and participatory design and research. We suggest considering harmony and humanness as the primary values guiding community-based interactions. We discuss several challenges in the collaboration and co-creation of new knowledge at the frontier of multiple cultural, linguist, research and design paradigms. In the absence of generalized guidelines we suggest to pursue local workability while producing trans-contextual credibility. Subjective viewpoints of participants in participatory design project.Local rural researcher's reflection and data collection presented.Importance of learning, project aim alignment and intrinsic pleasure in participation.Frustrations about exclusions, project continuity and resource scarcity.Self-consciousness and pride as main impact of participation.

References

[1]
H. Barki, J. Hartwick, Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude, MIS Q., 18 (1994) 59-82.
[2]
Bidwell, N., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., 2012a. Extending Connections Between Land and People Digitally: Designing with Rural Herero Communities in Namibia, Media Heritage and Social Media, Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture, (Ed.) Elisa Giaccardi, Published June 19th 2012, Routledge.
[3]
Bidwell, N.J., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., 2012b. Audio Pacemaker: walking, talking indigenous knowledge. In: Proceedings of SAICSIT 2012, Pretoria, South Africa.
[4]
N.J. Bidwell, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, G.K. Kapuire, S. Chivuno-Kuria, Situated interactions between audiovisual media and African herbal lore, Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., 15 (2011) 609-627.
[5]
N.J. Bidwell, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, G.K. Kapuire, M. Rehm, Pushing personhood into place: situating media in the transfer of rural knowledge in Africa, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 69 (2011) 618-631.
[6]
Bidwell, N.J., Siya, M.J., 2013. Situating Asynchronous Voice in Rural Africa, P. Kotzé et al. (Eds.): INTERACT 2013, Part III, LNCS 8119, pp. 36-53.
[7]
Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., 2010. User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project. In: Proceedings of PDC 2010, pp. 141-150.
[8]
Bossen, C., Dindler, C., Iversen, O.S., 2012. Impediments to user gains: experiences from a critical participatory design project. In: Proceedings of PDC 2012, pp. 31-40.
[9]
R. Boyatzis, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.
[10]
M. Brereton, J. Buur, New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing, Co Design, 4 (2008).
[11]
Byrne, E., Leopoldo, J., 2004. Contextuality of participation in IS design: a developing country perspective. In: Proceedings of PDC 2004.
[12]
Christie, M., 2004. Computer databases and aboriginal knowledge. In: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts Number 1, pp 4-12. Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
[13]
S. Christopher, V. Watts, A.K. McCormick, S. Young, Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership, Am. J. Public Health, 98 (2008) 1398-1406.
[14]
Clifford, J., Marcus, G.E. (Eds.), 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Univ of California Press
[15]
J. Daly, A. Kellehear, M. Gliksman, The Public Health Researcher: A Methodological Approach, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia, 1997.
[16]
Dearden, A., Rizvi, H., 2008. Participatory IT design and participatory development: a comparative review. In: Proceedings Participatory Design Conference, CPSR/ACM Indiana University, ISBN 978-0-9818561-0-0.
[17]
Dearden, A., 2013. Information Technology & International Development, vol 9, N 2, ICTD2012 Special issue, 1-17.
[18]
P. Dourish, G. Bell, Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2011.
[19]
Ehn, P., Badham, R., 2002. Participatory design and the collective designer. In: Binder, T., Gregory, J., Wagner, I. (Eds.), PDC 02 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmö, Sweden, 23-25 June 2002. CPRS, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
[20]
P. Evans, Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen's development as freedom, Stud. Comp. Int. Dev., 37 (2002) 54-60.
[21]
J. Fereday, E. Muir-Cochrane, The role of performance feedback in the self-assessment of competence: a research study with nursing clinicians, Collegian, 13 (2006) 10.
[22]
Green, L.J.F., 2012. Beyond South Africa's 'indigenous knowledge - science' wars. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2012, 108(7/8), Art. #631, 10 pages
[23]
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., Grinter, B., 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010, April 12-15, Atlanta, GA.
[24]
G.R. Hayes, The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 18 (2011).
[25]
Jensen, K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Rodil, K., Winschiers-Goagoses, N., Kapuire, G.K., Kamukandjandje, R., 2012. Putting it in perspective: designing a 3D visualization to contextualize indigenous knowledge in rural Namibia. In: Proceedings of DIS 2012.
[26]
Kapuire, G., Blake, E., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J., Chivuno-Kuria, S., 2010. Exploring Success and Failure in Development Informatics: Innovation, Research and Practice. A Revolution in ICT, the Last Hope for African Rural Communities' Technology Appropriation, IDIA, 2010, Cape Town.
[27]
Kapuire, G.K., Blake, E., 2011. An attempt to merge local and technological paradigms in the digital representation of indigenous knowledge. In: Proceedings of IKTC 2011, Windhoek, Namibia. ISBN 978-99945-72-37-3.
[28]
T. Kepe, The problem of defining 'community': challenges for the land reform programme in rural South Africa, Dev. S. Afr., 16 (1999) 415-433.
[29]
A.I. Khwaja, Is increasing community participation always a good thing?, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 2 (2004) 427-436.
[30]
J.S. Mbiti, African Religions and Philosophy, Heinemann, Harlow, UK, 1990.
[31]
Merritt, S., Bardzell, S., 2011. Postcolonial language and culture theory for HCI4D. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1675-1680.
[32]
Mkabela, N.Q., 2005. Using the Afrocentric Method in Researching Indigenous African Culture. The Qualitative Report, 10, 178-189. Retrieved from: {http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-1/mkabela.pdf}.
[33]
Mulemi, B., 2011. Salvaging African Perspectives of Reality via Afro-centric and Intersubjective Methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on African Studies ECAS4:Panel 111. June 14-18, 2011: The Nordic Africa Institute, Uppsala Sweden.
[34]
M. Murphy, Self-determination as a collective capability: the case of indigenous peoples, J. Hum. Dev. Capab. (2014). {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.878320}
[35]
S.B. Nasseem, "African Heritage and Contemporary Life: An Experience of Epistemological Change" Reprinted in "The African Philosophy Reader", in: "African Heritage and Contemporary Life: An Experience of Epistemological Change" Reprinted in "The African Philosophy Reader", Routledge, London, 2003, pp. 304-319.
[36]
P. Oakley, Projects with People. The Practices of Participation in Rural Development, International Labour Office, Geneva, 1991.
[37]
Oyugi, C., Dunckley, L., Smith, A., 2008. Evaluation methods and cultural differences: Studies across three continents. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI 2008: Using Bridges. pp. 318-325.
[38]
A. Peters, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, K. Awori, N.J. Bidwell, E. Blake, A. Kumar, S. Chivuno-Kuria, Collaborating with communities in Africa: a Hitchhikers guide, CHI Ext. Abstr., 2014 (2014) 1969-1974.
[39]
Reviere, R., 2001. Toward an Afrocentric Research Methodology. In: Journal of Black Studies, vol. 31, No. 6 (July, 2001), pp. 709-728, Sage Publications.
[40]
P. Rice, D. Ezzy, Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1999.
[41]
Rodil, K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J., Eskildsen, S., Rehm, M., Kapuire, G.K., 2011. A new visualization approach to re-contextualize indigenous knowledge in rural Africa. Human-computer interaction - INTERACT 2011. In: Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, September 5-9, 2011, Part II; 01/2011.
[42]
Rodil, K., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Jensen, K., Rehm, M. 2012. Homestead Creator - A Tool for Indigenous Designers, NordiChi 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark (October 2012).
[43]
Rodil, K., Rehm, M., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., 2013. Homestead Creator: using card sorting in search for culture-aware categorizations of interface objects. In: Proceedings of Interact 2013 14th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
[44]
A. Sen, Development as Freedom, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1999.
[45]
A. Sen, Response to Commentaries, Stud. Comp. Int. Dev., 37 (2002) 78-86.
[46]
L. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.
[47]
J. Tacchi, D. Slater, G. Hearn, Ethnographic Action Research. A User's Handbook Developed to Innovate and Research ICT Applications for Poverty Reduction, UNESCO, New Delhi, 2003.
[48]
Taylor, A., 2011. Out There. CHI2011. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[49]
Van der Velden, M., 2010. Design for the Contact Zone. In: Proceedings of the Cultural Attidudes Towards Technology and Communication Conference 2010.
[50]
H. Verran, M. Christie, B. Arbins-King, T. van Weeren, W. Yunupingu, Designing digital knowledge management tools with aboriginal Australians, Digit. Creat., 18 (2007) 129-142.
[51]
N. Winschiers-Goagoses, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, K. Rodil, G.K. Kapuire, K. Jensen, Design democratization with communities: drawing toward locally meaningful design, Int. J. Sociotechnol. Knowl. Dev. (IJSKD), 4 (2012) 32-43.
[52]
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J., Blake, E., Kapuire, G.K., RehmM., 2010a. Merging experiences and perspectives in the complexity of cross-cultural design. In: Proceedings of the IWIPS 2010: Ninth International Workshop on Internationlisation of Products and Systems.
[53]
H. Winschiers-Theophilus, N.J. Bidwell, S. Chivuno-Kuria, G.K. Kapuire, Determining requirements within an indigenous knowledge system of African rural communities, SAICSIT (2010) 332-340.
[54]
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Kapuire, G.K., Bidwell, N.J., Blake, E., 2010c. Being participated: a community approach. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Participatory Design, PDC 2010, Sydney, Australia - November 29-December 03, pp. 1-10.
[55]
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Jensen, K., Rodil, K., 2012a. Locally Situated Digital Representation of Indigenous Knowledge, CATAC 2012, Aarhus, Denmark, {www.catac2012.org}.
[56]
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J., Blake, E., 2012b. Community Consensus: Design Beyond Participation, Design Issues: vol. 28, Number 3, Summer 2012, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 89-100.
[57]
H. Winschiers-Theophilus, N.J. Bidwell, E. Blake, Altering participation through interactions and reflections in design, CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Des. Arts, 8 (2012) 163-182.
[58]
H. Winschiers-Theophilus, N.J. Bidwell, Toward an Afro-Centric indigenous HCI paradigm, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 29 (2013) 243-255.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)African Co-Design: Past, Present, and EmergingProceedings of the 4th African Human Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3628096.3629080(316-318)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Building Trust in Participatory Design to Promote Relational Network for Social InnovationProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 210.1145/3537797.3537817(94-102)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Overcoming Legacy Bias: Re-Designing Gesture Interactions in Virtual Reality With a San Community in NamibiaProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517549(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies  Volume 74, Issue C
February 2015
147 pages

Publisher

Academic Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2015

Author Tags

  1. Participatory design
  2. Rural community
  3. User gains
  4. User involvement

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)African Co-Design: Past, Present, and EmergingProceedings of the 4th African Human Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3628096.3629080(316-318)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Building Trust in Participatory Design to Promote Relational Network for Social InnovationProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 210.1145/3537797.3537817(94-102)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Overcoming Legacy Bias: Re-Designing Gesture Interactions in Virtual Reality With a San Community in NamibiaProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517549(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Reflections on Assets-Based Design: A Journey Towards A Collective of Assets-Based ThinkersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34795455:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2021)A Systematic Review of the ICTD Education and Learning Literature to Identify Scope, Impact, and Areas for Future WorkProceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Social Good10.1145/3462203.3475897(277-282)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2021
  • (2021)The Benefits of Using Design Workbooks with Speculative Design Proposals in Information Communication Technology for Development (ICTD)Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462140(1861-1874)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Going Beyond Empowered Design by Scaffolding Inter-community EngagementProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech10.1145/3461564.3461579(224-233)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2021
  • (2021)A community-initiated website development project: promoting a San community campsite initiativeProceedings of the 3rd African Human-Computer Interaction Conference: Inclusiveness and Empowerment10.1145/3448696.3448698(1-11)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021
  • (2020)From a ludic Loom of Ideas to the Spiral of Intercultural Co-creationProceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 110.1145/3385010.3385022(85-95)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020
  • (2020)Participant's View: Short-Term Evaluation of Realizing PD IdealsProceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 210.1145/3384772.3385145(138-142)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media