Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

A regret theory-based even swaps method with complex linguistic information and its application in early-stage lung cancer treatment selection

Published: 18 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality rate, and selecting treatment options for early-stage lung cancer patients is of great significance in improving cure rate. To help individuals make rational decisions, the even swap method, a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, provides an effective mechanism to make tradeoffs between criteria; however, the original even swap method ignored psychological characteristics of individuals and could not deal with complex linguistic information. To deal with the early-stage lung cancer treatment selection problem, this paper introduces generalized probabilistic linguistic term sets (GPLTSs) to describe complex linguistic information and proposes a generalized probabilistic linguistic even swap method based on the regret theory. Firstly, the upper and lower bounds corresponding to linguistic expressions are extracted to represent the uncertainty of GPLTSs. Then, a regret-rejoice function is introduced to express psychological characteristics of individuals when they making tradeoffs between criteria. Afterwards, a regret theory-based even swap method is proposed to rank alternatives. The proposed method is validated in the selection of early-stage lung cancer treatment options. Sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are given to show the feasibility of the proposed method.

References

[1]
S.J. Adams, E. Stone, D.R. Baldwin, R. Vliegenthart, P. Lee, F.J. Fintelmann, Lung cancer screening, The Lancet 401 (10374) (2023) 390–408.
[2]
American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, ASCO-ESMO consensus statement on quality cancer care, Journal of Clinical Oncology 24 (21) (2006) 3498–3499.
[3]
T.J.P. Batchelor, N.J. Rasburn, E. Abdelnour-Berchtold, A. Brunelli, R.J. Cerfolio, et al., Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERASVR) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS), European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 55 (1) (2019) 91–115.
[4]
D.E. Bell, Regret in decision making under uncertainty, Operations Research 30 (5) (1982) 961–981.
[5]
S. Campbell, E. Rubio, S. Ie, M. Boyd, Nonsurgical modalities for treatment of early-stage lung cancer, Clinical Pulmonary Medicine 22 (2) (2015) 87–97.
[6]
C.T. Chen, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets & Systems 114 (1) (2000) 1–9.
[7]
W.J. Chen, M. Goh, Y. Zou, Logistics provider selection for omni-channel environment with fuzzy axiomatic design and extended regret theory, Applied Soft Computing 71 (2018) 353–363.
[8]
K.Z. Chen, F. Lou, F. Yang, J. Zhang, H. Ye, W. Chen, et al., Circulating tumor DNA detection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients by targeted sequencing, Scientific Reports 6 (1) (2016) 31985,.
[9]
K.Z. Chen, J. Wang, Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of early stage lung cancer, Journal of Chinese Research Hospitals 7 (5) (2020) 84–89.
[10]
C.G. Chorus, Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria, Transportmetrica 8 (4) (2012) 291–305.
[11]
B. Corgnet, R. Hernan-Gonzalez, Revisiting the trade-off between risk and incentives: the shocking effect of random shocks, Management Science 65 (3) (2019) 1096–1114.
[12]
M.-F. D'Amours, F.T.H. Wu, O. Theisen-Lauk, E.K. Chan, A. McGuire, C. Ho, Surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A contemporary approach, European Respiratory Journal (2024),.
[13]
N. Deboever, K.G. Mitchell, H.A. Feldman, T. Cascone, B. Sepesi, Current surgical indications for non-Small-Cell lung cancer, Cancers 14 (5) (2022) 1263.
[14]
T. Dereli, K. Altun, Modified even-swaps: A novel, clear, rational and an easy-to-use mechanism for multi-issue negotiation, Computers & Industrial Engineering 63 (4) (2012) 1013–1029.
[15]
R. Fang, H. Liao, A. Mardani, How to aggregate uncertain and incomplete cognitive evaluation information in lung cancer treatment plan selection?, A Method Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory, Information Sciences 603 (2022) 222–243.
[16]
R. Fang, H.C. Liao, J.B. Yang, D.L. Xu, Generalised probabilistic linguistic evidential reasoning approach for multi-criteria decision-making under uncertainty, Journal of the Operational Research Society 72 (1) (2021) 130–144.
[17]
H.P. Greenwald, N.L. Polissar, E.F. Borgatta, R. McCorkle, G. Goodman, Social factors, treatment, and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, American Journal of Public Health 88 (11) (1998) 1681–1684.
[18]
J.S. Hammond, R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa, Even swaps: A rational method for making trade-offs, Harvard Business Review 76 (2) (1998) 137–149.
[19]
I. Houda, C. Dickhoff, C.A. Uyl-de Groot, R.A.M. Damhuis, N. Reguart, M. Provencio, et al., Challenges and controversies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a clinician’s perspective, The Lancet Regional Health-Europe 38 (2024).
[20]
T.J. Lahtinen, R.P. Hämäläinen, Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method, European Journal of Operational Research 249 (3) (2016) 890–898.
[21]
T.J. Lahtinen, R.P. Hämäläinen, C. Jenytin, On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 282 (1) (2020) 201–210.
[22]
X. Li, B. Hu, H. Li, B. You, Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of multiple primary lung cancer, Thoracic Cancer 10 (11) (2019) 2168–2174.
[23]
H.L. Li, L.C. Ma, Visualizing decision process on spheres based on the even swap concept, North-Holland 45 (2) (2008) 354–367.
[24]
P. Li, N. Wang, C. Wei, N. Zhang, A two-sided matching method considering the lowest value of acceptability with regret theory for probabilistic linguistic term sets, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 12 (4) (2021) 1–14.
[25]
H.C. Liao, R. Qin, C.Y. Gao, X.L. Wu, A. Hafezalkotob, F. Herrera, Score-HeDLiSF: A score function of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set based on hesitant degrees and linguistic scale functions: An application to unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic MULTIMOORA, Information Fusion 48 (2019) 39–54.
[26]
S.Y.M. Liu, M.M. Zheng, Y. Pan, S.Y. Liu, Y. Li, Y.L. Wu, Emerging evidence and treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer, Journal of Hematology & Oncology 16 (1) (2023) 1–20.
[27]
G. Loomes, R. Sugden, Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, The Economic Journal 92 (368) (1982) 805–824.
[28]
R.E. Merritt, M. Abdel-Rasoul, D.M. D'Souza, P.J. Kneuertz, Racial disparities in overall survival and surgical treatment for early stage lung cancer by facility type, Clinical Lung Cancer 22 (5) (2021) e691–e698.
[29]
G. Milutinovic, U. Ahonen-Jonnarth, S. Seipel, GISwaps: A new method for decision making in continuous choice models based on even swaps, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology 10 (3) (2018) 57–78.
[30]
S. Mokhles, N. Joost, M. Mark, A. Joachim, M. Alex, B. Ozcan, Ad. Bogers, T. Hanneke, Treatment selection of early stage non-small cell lung cancer: the role of the patient in clinical decision making, BioMed Central 18 (1) (2018) 79,.
[31]
J. Nasiry, I. Popescu, Advance selling when consumers regret, Management Science 58 (6) (2012) 1160–1177.
[32]
National Comprehensive Care Network, Non-small cell lung cancer, In: NCCN: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Version 2, 2024, (2024). Available online: https://www.nccn.org/. Accessed on 7 July 2024.
[33]
H. Peng, K. Shen, S. He, H. Zhang, J. Wang, Investment risk evaluation for new energy resources: an integrated decision support model based on regret theory and ELECTRE III, Energy Conversion and Management 183 (2019) 332–348.
[34]
X.D. Peng, Y. Yang, Algorithms for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets in stochastic multi-criteria decision making based on regret theory and prospect theory with combined weight, Applied Soft Computing 54 (2017) 415–430.
[35]
W. Jeffrey Petty, L. Paz-Ares, Emerging strategies for the treatment of small cell lung cancer, JAMA Oncology 9 (3) (2023) 419–429.
[36]
R. Qin, H.C. Liao, L.S. Jiang, A criterion utility conversion technique for probabilistic linguistic multiple criteria analysis in emergency management, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 27 (5) (2021) 1207–1226.
[37]
R. Qin, H.C. Liao, L.S. Jiang, An enhanced even swaps method based on prospect theory with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information and its application to the selection of emergency logistics plans under the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, Journal of the Operational Research Society 73 (6) (2022) 1227–1239.
[38]
R.G. Stirling, A. Harrison, J. Huang, V. Lee, J. Taverner, H. Barnes, Multidisciplinary meeting review in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, European Respiratory Review 33 (2024).
[39]
C.G. Slatore, D.H. Au, M.K. Gould, An official American thoracic society systematic review: insurance status and disparities in lung cancer practices and outcomes, American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 182 (9) (2010) 1195,.
[40]
H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, M. Laversanne, I. Soerjomataram, A. Jemal, F. Bray, Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71 (3) (2021) 209–249.
[41]
T. Wachowicz, T. Btaszczyk, P. Btaszczyk, The application of the even-swap-based scoring system to the selection of the heating source in house building projects, International Journal of Applied Management Science 5 (4) (2013) 340–354.
[42]
B. Wang, N. Hao, X. Zhang, Factors influencing the psychology and quality of life in lung cancer patients, Saudi Medical Journal 38 (9) (2017) 948–951.
[43]
Y.M. Wang, X. Jia, H.H. Song, L. Martínez, Improving consistency based on regret theory: A multi-attribute group decision making method with linguistic distribution assessments, Expert Systems with Applications 221 (2023).
[44]
J.J. Wang, X.L. Ma, Z.S. Xu, J.M. Zhan, Regret theory-based three-way decision model in hesitant fuzzy environments and its application to medical decision, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 30 (12) (2022) 5361–5375.
[45]
X. Zhang, H.M. Liang, F. Fang, X. Chen, A method for risky multiple attribute decision making considering regret and rejoicing of the decision maker, Computers & Industrial Engineering 124 (2018) 422–434.
[46]
W. Zhang, W. Luo, X. Gao, et al., A multi-attribute decision-making method for probabilistic language VIKOR based on correlation coefficient and entropy, The International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022, pp. 789–797.

Index Terms

  1. A regret theory-based even swaps method with complex linguistic information and its application in early-stage lung cancer treatment selection
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Information Sciences: an International Journal
        Information Sciences: an International Journal  Volume 681, Issue C
        Oct 2024
        1022 pages

        Publisher

        Elsevier Science Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 18 October 2024

        Author Tags

        1. Multiple criteria decision-making
        2. Early-stage lung cancer treatment
        3. Even swap
        4. Regret theory
        5. Generalized probabilistic linguistic term set

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media