Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Regret-based budgeted decision rules under severe uncertainty

Published: 02 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

One way to make decisions under uncertainty is to select an optimal option from a possible range of options, by maximizing the expected utilities derived from a probability model. However, under severe uncertainty, identifying precise probabilities is hard. For this reason, imprecise probability models uncertainty through convex sets of probabilities, and considers decision rules that can return multiple options to reflect insufficient information. Many well-founded decision rules have been studied in the past, but none of those standard rules are able to control the number of returned alternatives. This can be a problem for large decision problems, due to the cognitive burden decision makers have to face when presented with a large number of alternatives. Our contribution proposes regret-based ideas to construct new decision rules which return a bounded number of options, where the limit on the number of options is set in advance by the decision maker as an expression of their cognitive limitation. We also study their consistency and numerical behaviour.

Highlights

Propose regret-based decision rules which return a limited number of options.
Study their consistency with respect to standard imprecise probability decision rules.
Provide algorithms for regret-based decision rules and investigate their numerical behaviour.

References

[1]
Y.C.C. Alarcón, S. Destercke, Multi-label chaining with imprecise probabilities, in: European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches with Uncertainty, Springer, 2021, pp. 413–426.
[2]
F.J. Anscombe, R.J. Aumann, A definition of subjective probability, Ann. Math. Stat. 34 (1963) 199–205.
[3]
A. Antonucci, G. Corani, The multilabel naive credal classifier, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 83 (2017) 320–336.
[4]
J.M. Aughenbaugh, C.J.J. Paredis, The value of using imprecise probabilities in engineering design, J. Mech. Des. 128 (2005) 969–979.
[5]
T. Augustin, F.P.A. Coolen, G. de Cooman, M.C.M. Troffaes, Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities, John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[6]
H. Bains, A. Madariaga, M.C.M. Troffaes, B. Kazemtabrizi, An economic model for offshore transmission asset planning under severe uncertainty, Renew. Energy 160 (2020) 1174–1184,.
[7]
C. Denis, M. Hebiri, Confidence sets with expected sizes for multiclass classification, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18 (2017) 3571–3598.
[8]
S. Feng, The Poisson-Dirichlet Distribution and Related Topics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
[9]
C. Jansen, G. Schollmeyer, T. Augustin, Concepts for decision making under severe uncertainty with partial ordinal and partial cardinal preferences, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 98 (2018) 112–131.
[10]
C. Jansen, G. Schollmeyer, T. Augustin, Quantifying degrees of e-admissibility in decision making with imprecise probabilities, in: Reflections on the Foundations of Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Teddy Seidenfeld, Springer, 2022, pp. 319–346.
[11]
I. Levi, The Enterprise of Knowledge, MIT Press, London, 1980.
[12]
P. Limbourg, R. Savic, J. Petersen, H. Kochs, Fault tree analysis in an early design stage using the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, in: Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety, 2007, pp. 713–722.
[13]
W. Liu, H. Wang, X. Shen, I.W. Tsang, The emerging trends of multi-label learning, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44 (2021) 7955–7974.
[14]
Lorieul, T.; Joly, A.; Shasha, D. (2021): Classification under ambiguity: when is average-k better than top-k?. preprint arXiv:2112.08851.
[15]
E. Miranda, I. Montes, Centroids of the core of exact capacities: a comparative study, Ann. Oper. Res. 321 (2023) 409–449.
[16]
E. Miranda, I. Montes, A. Presa, Inner approximations of coherent lower probabilities and their application to decision making problems, Ann. Oper. Res. (2023) 1–39.
[17]
S. Moral-García, S. Destercke, Partial calibrated multi-label ranking, in: International Conference on Soft Methods in Probability and Statistics, Springer, 2022, pp. 287–294.
[18]
N. Nakharutai, Algorithms for generating sets of gambles for decision making with lower previsions, in: V.N. Huynh, T. Entani, C. Jeenanunta, M. Inuiguchi, P. Yenradee (Eds.), Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 62–71.
[19]
N. Nakharutai, S. Destercke, M.C.M. Troffaes, Decision making under severe uncertainty on a budget, in: F. Dupin de Saint-Cyr, M. Öztürk-Escoffier, N. Potyka (Eds.), 15th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2022), Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 186–201,.
[20]
N. Nakharutai, M.C.M. Troffaes, C.C.S. Caiado, Improving and benchmarking of algorithms for decision making with lower previsions, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 113 (2019) 91–105,. arXiv:1906.12215.
[21]
L. Paton, M.C.M. Troffaes, N. Boatman, M. Hussein, A. Hart, A robust Bayesian analysis of the impact of policy decisions on crop rotations, in: T. Augustin, S. Doria, E. Miranda, E. Quaeghebeur (Eds.), ISIPTA'15: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, ARACNE, Pescara, Italy, 2015, pp. 217–226. http://www.sipta.org/isipta15/data/paper/17.pdf.
[22]
B. Quost, S. Destercke, Classification by pairwise coupling of imprecise probabilities, Pattern Recognit. 77 (2018) 412–425.
[23]
A.H. Schumann, D. Nijssen, Application of Scenarios and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Tools in Flood Polder Planning, Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2011, pp. 249–275.
[24]
M.C.M. Troffaes, Decision making under uncertainty using imprecise probabilities, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 45 (2007) 17–29,. arXiv:1807.03705.
[25]
P. Viappiani, C. Boutilier, On the equivalence of optimal recommendation sets and myopically optimal query sets, Artif. Intell. 286 (2020).
[26]
P. Walley, Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1991.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Sciences: an International Journal
Information Sciences: an International Journal  Volume 665, Issue C
Apr 2024
870 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 02 July 2024

Author Tags

  1. 0000
  2. 1111

Author Tags

  1. Decision
  2. Regret
  3. Minimax
  4. Maximin
  5. Imprecise probability
  6. Optimization
  7. Numerical algorithm

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media