Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Knowledge, ignorance, and uncertainty: : An investigation from the perspective of some differential equations

Published: 01 April 2022 Publication History

Graphical abstract

Display Omitted

Highlights

Proposes a novel quantification of two key concepts in expert/intelligent systems.
These concepts are the knowledge and ignorance levels.
Some theoretical results are developed to provide a holistic and in-depth treatment.
Some illustrative examples demonstrate key computational issues.
These results can become an integral foundation for more important developments.

Abstract

People use knowledge on several cognitive tasks such as when they recognize objects, rank entities such as the alternatives in multi-criteria decision making, or for classification tasks of decision making / expert / intelligent systems. When people have sufficient relevant knowledge, they can make well-distinctive assessments among entities. Otherwise, they may exhibit some uncertainty. This paper establishes two differential equations, of which one is for the interaction between the knowledge level and the uncertainty level, and the other is for the interaction between the ignorance level and the uncertainty level. By solving these two differential equations under certain boundary conditions, one can derive that the proposed knowledge level indicator is equivalent to Wierman's knowledge granularity measure up to a constant (exactly, ln2). Moreover, the knowledge level indicator and the ignorance level indicator are found to be in a complementary relationship with each other. That is, more knowledge implies less ignorance, and vice-versa. The results of this study bridge a critical gap that exists in the understanding of the concepts of knowledge and ignorance.

References

[1]
M. Alavi, D.E. Leidner, Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly 25 (2001) 107–136,.
[2]
K. Anjaria, Negation and entropy: Effectual knowledge management equipment for learning organizations, Expert Systems with Applications 157 (2020) 113497,.
[3]
K.J. Arrow, A difficulty in the concept of social welfare, Journal of Political Economy 58 (4) (1950) 328–346,.
[4]
S. Boroushaki, J. Malczewski, Measuring consensus for collaborative decision-making: A GIS-based approach, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34 (4) (2010) 322–332,.
[5]
Carlsson, S. A., El Sawy, O., Eriksson, I. V., & Raven, A. (1996, July). Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Shared Knowledge Creation: In Search of a New Design Theory for Strategic Information Systems. In ECIS (pp. 1067-1076).
[6]
P. Chen, Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 168 (2021) 114186,.
[7]
F. Hou, A consensus gap indicator and its application to group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation 24 (3) (2015) 415–428,.
[8]
F. Hou, The prametric-based GDM selection procedure under linguistic assessments, IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–8,.
[9]
F. Hou, The prametric-based GDM procedure under fuzzy environment, Group Decision and Negotiation 25 (5) (2016) 1071–1084,.
[10]
F. Hou, E. Triantaphyllou, An iterative approach for achieving consensus when ranking a finite set of alternatives by a group of experts, European Journal of Operational Research 275 (2) (2019) 570–579,.
[11]
F. Hou, Y. Zhai, X. You, An equilibrium in group decision and its association with the Nash equilibrium in game theory, Computers & Industrial Engineering 139 (2020) 106138,.
[12]
Raymond, W. (1965). Introduction to the Foundations of Mathematics (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Chapter 2-8: Axioms defining equivalence, pp. 48-50.
[13]
A.K. Sen, A possibility theorem on majority decisions, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 34 (2) (1966) 491,.
[14]
C.E. Shannon, A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal 5 (1) (2001) 3–55,.
[15]
C. Stanley, Knowing and acknowledging, must we mean what we say, Cambridge University Press (2002) 238–266.
[16]
E. Triantaphyllou, F. Hou, J. Yanase, Analysis of the final ranking decisions made by experts after a consensus has been reached in group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation 29 (2) (2020) 271–291,.
[17]
E. Triantaphyllou, J. Yanase, F. Hou, Post-consensus analysis of group decision making processes by means of a graph theoretic and an association rules mining approach, Omega 94 (2020) 102208,.
[18]
T.C. Wang, H.D. Lee, Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (5) (2009) 8980–8985,.
[19]
M.J. Wierman, Measuring uncertainty in rough set theory, International Journal of General Systems 28 (4–5) (1999) 283–297,.
[20]
E. Yalcin, F. Ismailoglu, A. Bilge, An entropy empowered hybridized aggregation technique for group recommender systems, Expert Systems with Applications 166 (2021) 114111,.

Index Terms

  1. Knowledge, ignorance, and uncertainty: An investigation from the perspective of some differential equations
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
            Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal  Volume 191, Issue C
            Apr 2022
            1333 pages

            Publisher

            Pergamon Press, Inc.

            United States

            Publication History

            Published: 01 April 2022

            Author Tags

            1. Knowledge
            2. Uncertainty
            3. Wierman's knowledge granularity measure
            4. Differential equations

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 0
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            View options

            Figures

            Tables

            Media

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media