Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Beyond positive or negative

Published: 01 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Sentiment analysis techniques are increasingly used to grasp reactions from social media users to unexpected and potentially stressful social events. This paper argues that, alongside assessments of the affective valence of social media content as negative or positive, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the context in which reactions are expressed and the specific functions that users' emotional states may reflect. To demonstrate this, we present a qualitative analysis of affective expressions on Twitter collected in Germany during the 2011 EHEC food contamination incident based on a coding scheme developed from Skinner et al.'s (2003) coping classification framework. Affective expressions of coping were found to be diverse not only in terms of valence but also in the adaptive functions they served: beyond the positive or negative tone, some people perceived the outbreak as a threat while others as a challenge to cope with. We discuss how this qualitative sentiment analysis can allow a better understanding of the way the overall situation is perceived - threat or challenge - and the resources that individuals experience having to cope with emerging demands. Qualitative sentiment analysis indicates the functions underlying users' emotions.We analysed affective Twitter expressions during the 2011 EHEC outbreak in Germany.Expressions show how people cope with stressful events, beyond positive or negative.The analysis helps diagnose if the situation is perceived as a threat or challenge.The analysis can be useful for effective crisis communication during social crises.

References

[1]
A. Bandura, Social cognitive theory of mass communication, Media Psychology, 3 (2001) 265-299.
[2]
J. Barnett, G.M. Breakwell, Risk perception and experience: hazard personality profiles and individual differences, Risk Analysis, 21 (2001) 171-178.
[3]
J. Barnett, G.M. Breakwell, The social amplification of risk and the hazard sequence: the October 1995 oral contraceptive pill scare, Health, Risk & Society, 5 (2003) 301-313.
[4]
J. Blascovich, W.B. Mendes, Challenge and threat appraisals: the role of affective cues, in: Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001, pp. 59-82.
[5]
P. Brooker, J. Barnett, T. Cribbin, A. Lang, J. Martin, User-driven data capture: locating and analysing twitter conversation about cystic fibrosis without keywords, in: SAGE research methods cases, SAGE Publications, London, 2013.
[6]
J. Burgess, A. Bruns, Twitter archives and the challenges of "Big Social Data" for media and communication research, M/C Journal, 15 (2012). http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/561
[7]
C. Chew, G. Eysenbach, Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak, Plos One, 5 (2010) e14118.
[8]
B.E. Compas, J.K. Connor-Smith, H. Saltzman, A.H. Thomsen, M.E. Wadsworth, Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research, Psychological Bulletin, 127 (2001) 87-127.
[9]
J. Drury, C. Cocking, S. Reicher, A. Burton, D. Schofield, A. Hardwick, Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: a new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model, Behavior Research Methods, 41 (2009) 957-970. https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.957
[10]
D. D'iuso, E. Blake, M. Fitzpatrick, M. Drapeau, Cognitive errors, coping patterns, and the therapeutic alliance: a pilot study of in-session process, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 9 (2009) 108-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14733140902804276
[11]
S. Folkman, J.T. Moskowitz, Coping: pitfalls and promise, Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (2004) 745-774.
[12]
E. Frydenberg, Coping research: Historical background, links with emotion, and new research directions on adaptive processes, Australian Journal of Psychology, 66 (2014) 82-92.
[13]
R. Gaspar, J. Barnett, B. Seibt, Crisis as seen by the individual: the Norm Deviation Approach/La crisis vista por el individuo: el Enfoque de la Desviación de la Norma, Psyecology, 6 (2015) 103-135.
[14]
R. Gaspar, S. Gorjão, F. Seibt, L. Lima, J. Barnett, A. Moss, J. Wills, Tweeting during food crises: a psychosocial analysis of threat coping expressions in Spain, during the 2011 European EHEC outbreak, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72 (2014) 239-254.
[15]
M. Ghiassi, J. Skinner, D. Zimbra, Twitter brand sentiment analysis: a hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network, Expert Systems with Applications, 40 (2013) 6266-6282.
[16]
I. Gilles, A. Bangerter, A. Clémence, E.G.T. Green, F. Krings, A. Mouton, Collective symbolic coping with disease threat and othering: a case study of avian influenza, The British Journal of Social Psychology/the British Psychological Society, 52 (2013) 83-102.
[17]
T. Heverin, L. Zach, Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: a study of three campus shootings, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (2012) 34-47.
[18]
T. Highfield, S. Harrington, A. Bruns, Twitter as a Technology for audiencing and fandom, Information, Communication & Society, 16 (2013) 315-339.
[19]
F.E. Jonas, I. Mcgregor, J. Klackl, D. Agroskin, I. Fritsche, C. Holbrook, Elsevier Inc, 2014.
[20]
A.D. Kramer, J.E. Guillory, J.T. Hancock, Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (2014) 8788-8790.
[21]
K.A. Lachlan, P.R. Spence, X. Lin, Expressions of risk awareness and concern through Twitter: on the utility of using the medium as an indication of audience needs, Computers in Human Behavior, 35 (2014) 554-559.
[22]
J.S. Lerner, D. Keltner, Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice, Cognition & Emotion, 14 (2000) 473-493.
[23]
R. Lofstedt, Communicating food risks in an era of growing public distrust: three case studies, Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 33 (2013) 192-202.
[24]
T. Lund, The qualitative-quantitative distinction: some comments, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49 (2005) 115-132.
[25]
Y. Mou, C.A. Lin, Communicating food safety via the social media: the role of knowledge and emotions on risk perception and prevention, Science Communication, 36 (2014) 593-616.
[26]
D. Murthy, Twitter: Digital media and society series, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2013.
[27]
G. Neubaum, L. Rösner, A.M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten, N.C. Krämer, Psychosocial functions of social media usage in a disaster situation: a multi-methodological approach, Computers in Human Behavior, 34 (2014) 28-38.
[28]
O. Oh, M. Agrawal, H.R. Rao, Community intelligence and social media services: a rumour theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises, MIS Quartely, 37 (2013) 407-426.
[29]
L. Palen, S. Vieweg, K.M. Anderson, Supporting "Everyday Analysts" in safety- and time-critical situations, The Information Society, 27 (2010) 52-62.
[30]
P. Panagiotopoulos, A.Z. Bigdeli, S. Sams, Citizen-government collaboration on social media: the case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England, Government Information Quarterly, 31 (2014) 349-357.
[31]
N. Pidgeon, J. Barnett, Chalara and the social amplification of risk, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, 2013.
[32]
H. Purohit, A. Hampton, V.L. Shalin, A.P. Sheth, J. Flach, S. Bhatt, What kind of #conversation is Twitter? Mining #psycholinguistic cues for emergency coordination, Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (2013) 2438-2447.
[33]
B.J. Reynolds, When the facts are just not enough: credibly communicating about risk is riskier when emotions run high and time is short, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 254 (2011) 206-214.
[34]
B. Reynolds, M.W. Seeger, Crisis and emergency risk communication as an Integrative model, Journal of Health Communication, 10 (2005) 43-55.
[35]
B. Rimé, Interpersonal emotion regulation, in: Handbook of emotion regulation, Guilford Publications, New York, 2007, pp. 466-485.
[36]
RKI - Robert Koch Institute, Final presentation and evaluation of the epidemiological findings in the EHEC O104:H4 outbreak, Germany 2011, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
[37]
P. Rutsaert, Á. Regan, Z. Pieniak, Á. McConnon, A. Moss, P. Wall, The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 30 (2013) 84-91.
[38]
M.W. Seeger, T.L. Sellnow, R.R. Ulmer, Communication and Organizational crisis, in:, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003.
[39]
T.L. Sellnow, M.W. Seeger, Theorizing crisis communication, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
[40]
L. Shan, A. Regan, A. De Brún, J. Barnett, M. C. a van der Sanden, P. Wall, Food crisis coverage by social and traditional media: a case study of the 2008 Irish dioxin crisis, Public Understanding of Science, 23 (2014) 911-928. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662512472315
[41]
A.P. Sheth, H. Purohit, A.S. Jadhav, P. Kapanipathi, L. Chen, Understanding events through analysis of social media, 2010. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/knoesis/788
[42]
E.A. Skinner, K. Edge, J. Altman, H. Sherwood, Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping, Psychological Bulletin, 129 (2003) 216-269.
[43]
D. Smith, J. McCloskey, Risk and crisis management in the public sector: risk communication and the social amplification of public sector risk, Public Money & Management, 18 (1998) 41-50.
[44]
P.R. Spence, K.A. Lachlan, X. Lin, M. del Greco, Variability in twitter content across the stages of a natural disaster: implications for crisis communication, Communication Quarterly, 63 (2015) 171-186.
[45]
P.R. Spence, L.D. Nelson, K. a Lachlan, Psychological responses and coping strategies after an urban bridge collapse, Traumatology, 16 (2010) 7-15.
[46]
S.E. Taylor, A.L. Stanton, Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3 (2007) 377-401.
[47]
T. Terpstra, A. de Vries, R. Stronkman, G.L. Paradies, Towards a realtime Twitter analysis during crises for operational crisis management, in: Proceedings of the 9th international ISCRAM conference, 2012, April.
[48]
M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, Sentiment in twitter events, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (2011) 406-418.
[49]
M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, A. Kappas, Sentiment strength detection in short informal text, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (2010) 2544-2558.
[50]
N.D. Weinstein, The precaution adoption process, Health Psychology, 7 (1988) 355-386.
[51]
L.P. Wong, I.C. Sam, Temporal changes in psychobehavioral responses during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, Preventive medicine, 51 (2010) 92-93.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Private Life of QAnon: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Americans' Exposure to QAnon Content on the WebProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870578:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)MRME-NetJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.10207036:5Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • (2024)A cyber risk prediction model using common vulnerabilities and exposuresExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121599237:PBOnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior  Volume 56, Issue C
March 2016
378 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 March 2016

Author Tags

  1. Coping
  2. Crisis communication
  3. Emergency Management
  4. Qualitative analysis
  5. Sentiment analysis
  6. Twitter

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Private Life of QAnon: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Americans' Exposure to QAnon Content on the WebProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870578:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)MRME-NetJournal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.10207036:5Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • (2024)A cyber risk prediction model using common vulnerabilities and exposuresExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121599237:PBOnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Sentiment Analysis for the Natural Environment: A Systematic ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/360460556:4(1-37)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
  • (2022)Organizational Adoption of Sentiment Analytics in Social Media NetworksInternational Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach10.4018/IJITSA.30702315:2(1-29)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Simulation Model on Network Public Opinion Communication Model of Major Public Health Emergency and Management System DesignScientific Programming10.1155/2022/59024452022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Opening organizational learning in crisis managementThe Journal of Strategic Information Systems10.1016/j.jsis.2021.10169230:4Online publication date: 9-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Nowhere else to goComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2021.107103128:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2022
  • (2022)Artificial Intelligence and Reduced SMEs’ Business Risks. A Dynamic Capabilities Analysis During the COVID-19 PandemicInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-022-10249-624:4(1223-1247)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Beyond Entertainment: Unpacking Danmaku and Comments' Role of Information Sharing and Sentiment Expression in Online Crisis VideosProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34795555:CSCW2(1-27)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media