Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Digital Twin Stakeholder Communication: : Characteristics, Challenges, and Best Practices

Published: 18 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Digital Twins (DT) encompass virtual models interconnected with a physical system through data links. Although DTs hold significant potential for positive organisational impact, their successful adoption in industrial practice remains limited. Whereas existing research predominantly focuses on technical challenges, more recent studies underscore the importance of addressing organisational and human factors to overcome implementation barriers. One central aspect in this context is stakeholder communication, especially given the ambiguous nature of the term DT in academic and industrial discussions. To expand the limited understanding of the factors causing challenging DT stakeholder communications, this article presents findings from an extensive exploratory study. It involves 27 in-depth interviews and two focus groups with highly experienced DT professionals. By employing grounded theory and the Gioia methodology, a grounded model for DT stakeholder communication challenges is derived. This model reveals the complex communication dynamics within DT projects, emphasising the emergence of novel stakeholder communication patterns that heavily rely on multidisciplinary collaboration. In total, 28 communication challenges were identified, grouped into eight theoretical themes and categorised into two aggregate dimensions: human- and organisation-centric challenges. Additionally, the study identified 15 practices, e.g., defining clear objectives, and starting small and building gradually, that organisations are following to mitigate these challenges. As a result, this article provides the theoretical groundwork for a comprehensive understanding of DT stakeholder communication and its associated challenges by revealing distinctive features and offering practical guidance to overcome critical challenges in DT projects.

Highlights

Identifies 10 unique characteristics of Digital Twin projects that distinguish them from conventional projects in manufacturing organisations.
First article to present 28 detailed Digital Twin stakeholder communication challenges.
Reveals 15 practices of how to overcome stakeholder communication challenges to facilitate Digital Twin adoption.

References

[1]
Alsulaimi A., Abdullah T., Management of stakeholder communications in IT projects, in: 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security, ICCAIS, IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.
[2]
Benfer M., Peukert S., Lanza G., A framework for digital twins for production network management, Procedia CIRP 104 (2021) 1269–1274.
[3]
Bordeleau, F., Combemale, B., Eramo, R., Van Den Brand, M., Wimmer, M., 2020. Towards Model-Driven Digital Twin Engineering: Current Opportunities and Future Challenges. In: ICSMM 2020 - International Conference on Systems Modelling and Management. pp. 1–10.
[4]
Cassell C., Symon G., Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, sage, 2004.
[5]
Corbin J.M., Strauss A., Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria, Qual. Sociol. 13 (1) (1990) 3–21.
[6]
Gioia D., A systematic methodology for doing qualitative research, J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 57 (1) (2021) 20–29.
[7]
Gioia D.A., Corley K.G., Hamilton A.L., Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology, Organ. Res. Methods 16 (1) (2013) 15–31.
[8]
Glaessgen E.H., Stargel D.S., The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and U.S. air force vehicles, in: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference - Special Session on the Digital Twin, 2012, Available: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120008178. (Accessed 26 June 2022).
[9]
Gökalp E., Martinez V., Digital transformation maturity assessment: development of the digital transformation capability maturity model, Int. J. Prod. Res. 60 (20) (2022) 6282–6302.
[10]
Hale J.E., Dulek R.E., Hale D.P., Crisis response communication challenges: Building theory from qualitative data, Int. J. Bus. Commun. 42 (2) (2005) 112–134.
[11]
Hedman E., Valo M., Communication challenges facing management teams, Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 36 (8) (2015) 1012–1024.
[12]
Holmström H., Fitzgerald B., Ågerfalk P.J., Conchúir E.Ó., Agile practices reduce distance in global software development, Inf. Syst. Manag. 23 (3) (2006) 7–18.
[13]
Hu W., Zhang T., Deng X., Liu Z., Tan J., Digital twin: a state-of-the-art review of its enabling technologies, applications and challenges, J. Intell. Manuf. Special Equip. 2 (1) (2021) 1–34.
[14]
Jones D., Snider C., Nassehi A., Yon J., Hicks B., Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 29 (2020) 36–52.
[15]
Kamble S.S., Gunasekaran A., Parekh H., Mani V., Belhadi A., Sharma R., Digital twin for sustainable manufacturing supply chains: Current trends, future perspectives, and an implementation framework, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 176 (2022).
[16]
Kober, C., Adomat, V., Ahanpanjeh, M., Fette, M., Wulfsberg, J., 2022a. Digital Twin Fidelity Requirements Model For Manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Production Systems and Logistics. CPSL, pp. 595–611.
[17]
Kober C., Algan B.N., Fette M., Wulfsberg J.P., Relations of digital twin fidelity and benefits: A design-to-value approach, Procedia CIRP 119 (2023) 809–815.
[18]
Kober, C., Fette, M., Wulfsberg, J.P., 2022b. Challenges of Digital Twin Application in Manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. IEEM, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 162–168.
[19]
Kober C., Fette M., Wulfsberg J.P., A method for calculating optimum digital twin fidelity, Procedia CIRP (2023).
[20]
Kritzinger W., Karner M., Traar G., Henjes J., Sihn W., Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification, IFAC-PapersOnLine 51 (11) (2018) 1016–1022.
[21]
Lattanzi L., Raffaeli R., Peruzzini M., Pellicciari M., Digital twin for smart manufacturing: a review of concepts towards a practical industrial implementation, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 34 (6) (2021) 567–597.
[22]
Liu M., Fang S., Dong H., Xu C., Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications, J. Manuf. Syst. 58 (2021) 346–361. Digital Twin towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0.
[23]
Liu Y.K., Ong S.K., Nee A.Y.C., State-of-the-art survey on digital twin implementations, Adv. Manufact. 10 (1) (2022) 1–23.
[24]
Lu Y., Liu C., Wang K.I.K., Huang H., Xu X., Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 61 (2020).
[25]
Medina F.G., Umpierrez A.W., Martínez V., Fromm H., A maturity model for digital twin implementations in the commercial aerospace oem industry, in: 2021 10th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management, ICITM, IEEE, 2021, pp. 149–156.
[26]
Michael, J., Pfeiffer, J., Rumpe, B., Wortmann, A., 2022. Integration Challenges for Digital Twin Systems-of-Systems. In: 10th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and Software Ecosystems. pp. 1–10.
[27]
Mourtzis D., Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends, Int. J. Prod. Res. 58 (7) (2019) 1927–1949.
[28]
Osterrieder P., Budde L., Friedli T., The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: A systematic literature review, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 221 (2020).
[29]
Parmar B.L., Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C., Purnell L., De Colle S., Stakeholder theory: The state of the art, Acad. Manag. Ann. 4 (1) (2010) 403–445.
[30]
Perno M., Hvam L., Haug A., Implementation of digital twins in the process industry: A systematic literature review of enablers and barriers, Comput. Ind. 134 (2022).
[31]
Psarommatis F., May G., A literature review and design methodology for digital twins in the era of zero defect manufacturing, Int. J. Prod. Res. 61 (16) (2023) 5723–5743.
[32]
Qi Q., Tao F., Hu T., Anwer N., Liu A., Wei Y., Wang L., Nee A., Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin, J. Manuf. Syst. 58 (2021) 3–21.
[33]
Rockmann K.W., Vough H.C., Using quotes to present claims: Practices for the writing stages of qualitative research, Organ. Res. Methods (2023).
[34]
Saporiti N., Cannas V.G., Pozzi R., Rossi T., Challenges and countermeasures for digital twin implementation in manufacturing plants: A Delphi study, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 261 (2023).
[35]
Semeraro C., Lezoche M., Panetto H., Dassisti M., Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review, Comput. Ind. 130 (2021).
[36]
Soori M., Arezoo B., Dastres R., Digital twin for smart manufacturing, A review, Sustain. Manuf. Serv. Econ. 2 (2023).
[37]
Spoor J., Weber J., Schematic categorization and definition of applied and target-oriented digital twins, 2023, pp. 103–112. 20. ASIM Fachtagung Simulation in Produktion und Logistik.
[38]
Stark R., Kind S., Neumeyer S., Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design, CIRP Ann. 66 (1) (2017) 169–172.
[39]
Sun Z., Zhang R., Zhu X., The progress and trend of digital twin research over the last 20 years: A bibliometrics-based visualization analysis, J. Manuf. Syst. 74 (2024) 1–15.
[40]
Tao F., Zhang H., Liu A., Nee A.Y.C., Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 15 (4) (2019) 2405–2415.
[41]
Trauer, J., Mutschler, M., Mörtl, M., Zimmermann, M., 2022. Challenges in Implementing Digital Twins – a Survey. In: Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. CIE, St. Louis.
[42]
Unterhitzenberger C., Wilson H., James Bryde D., Rost M., Joby R., The stakeholder challenge: dealing with challenging situations involving stakeholders, Prod. Plan. Control 32 (11) (2021) 926–941.
[43]
VanDerHorn E., Digital twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation, Decis. Support Syst. 145 (2021).
[44]
Xu X., Lu Y., Vogel-Heuser B., Wang L., Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception, J. Manuf. Syst. 61 (2021) 530–535.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry  Volume 161, Issue C
Oct 2024
247 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 18 November 2024

Author Tags

  1. Digital Twin communication
  2. Digital Twin challenges
  3. Digital Twin characteristics
  4. Manufacturing
  5. Industry 5.0
  6. Industry 4.0

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media