Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Teachers in school-based technology innovations

Published: 01 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In many innovations in technology and education in secondary schools, teachers are the crucial agents of these innovations. To select, match and support groups of teachers for particular school projects, school principals could be supported with insights into teachers beliefs about teaching, learning and technology. A teacher typology has been developed based on an online questionnaire completed by 1602 teachers from 59 Dutch secondary schools. Teachers are grouped on the basis of their beliefs about learned-centered teaching and attitudes towards technology, which underlie the school innovations that form the context of the current research. Five teacher types are distinguished: 1) Learner-centered teachers with technology, 2) Teachers critical of technology use in school, 3) Teachers uncomfortable with technology, 4) Teachers uneasy with learned-centered teaching and 5) Teachers critical of a clear-cut stance. This classification of teachers into these five types could be used to select or match the right group of teachers to a particular intervention or to organize different professional development activities for different types of school teachers. Teachers' learner-centered beliefs and attitudes towards technology are examined.A questionnaire is completed by 1602 teachers from 59 secondary schools.A typology has been developed with five teacher types.The types can be scaled on a dimension of learner-centered teaching with technology.

References

[1]
W. Admiraal, D. Lockhorst, B. Smit, S. Weijers, The Integrative Model of Behavior Prediction to explain technology use in post-graduate teacher education programs in the Netherlands, International Journal of Higher Education, 2 (2013) 172-178.
[2]
C.L. Alger, Secondary teachers' conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the career span, Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 (2009) 743-751.
[3]
A.T. Barkatsas, J. Malone, Atypology of mathematics teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics and instructional practices, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17 (2005) 69-90.
[4]
J. Biggs, What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning, Higher Education Research & Development, 31 (2012) 39-55.
[5]
J.B. Biggs, C.S. Tang, Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead, United Kingdom, 2011.
[6]
T. Calinski, J. Harabasz, Adendrite method for cluster analysis, Communications in Statistics, 3 (1974) 1-27.
[7]
C.-H. Chen, Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration?, The Journal of Educational Research, 102 (2008) 65-75.
[8]
J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
[9]
F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13 (1989) 319-339.
[10]
S. De Vries, E.P.W.A. Jansen, W.J.C.M. van de Grift, Profiling teachers' continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching, Teaching and Teacher Education, 33 (2013) 78-89.
[11]
P. Ertmer, Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration, Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (1999) 47-61.
[12]
P.A. Ertmer, A.T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, O. Sadik, E. Sendurur, P. Sendurur, Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship, Computers & Education, 59 (2012) 423-435.
[13]
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach, Psychology Press, New York, 2010.
[14]
S. Hennessy, K. Ruthven, S. Brindley, Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27 (2005) 155-192.
[15]
R. Hermans, J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, M. Valcke, The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers, Computers & Education, 51 (2008) 1499-1509.
[16]
E. Judson, How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection?, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14 (2006) 581-597.
[17]
D.M. Kagan, Implications of research on teacher belief, Educational Psychologist, 27 (1992) 65-90.
[18]
C.-M. Kim, M.K. Kim, C. Lee, J.M. Spector, K. DeMeester, Teacher beliefs and technology integration, Teaching and Teacher Education, 29 (2013) 76-85.
[19]
K. Kreijns, M. Vermeulen, P.A. Kirschner, H. van Buuren, F. van Acker, Adopting the integrative model of behaviour prediction to explain teachers' willingness to use ICT: A perspective for research on teachers' ICT usage in pedagogical practices, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22 (2013) 55-71.
[20]
S.-H. Liu, Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration, Computers & Education, 56 (2011) 1012-1022.
[21]
J. Luttenberg, J. Imants, K. van Veen, Reform as ongoing positioning process: The positioning of a teacher in the context of reform, Teachers and Teaching, 19 (2013) 293-310.
[22]
E. Maclellan, Updating understandings of teaching: Taking account of learners' and teachers' beliefs, Teaching in Higher Education, 20 (2014) 171-182.
[23]
M. Mama, S. Hennessy, Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT, Computers & Education, 68 (2013) 380-387.
[24]
J.A. Meirink, P.C. Meijer, N. Verloop, Th.C.M. Bergen, Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 25 (2009) 89-100.
[25]
J. Orlando, ICT-mediated practice and constructivist practices: Is this still the best plan for teachers' uses of ICT?, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22 (2013) 231-246.
[26]
M.F. Pajares, Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct, Review of Educational Research, 62 (1992) 307-332.
[27]
D. Petko, Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the will, skill, tool model and integrating teachers' constructivist orientations, Computers & Education, 58 (2012) 1351-1359.
[28]
C. Player-Koro, Factors influencing teachers' use of ICT in education, Education Inquiry, 3 (2012) 93-108.
[29]
S. Prestridge, The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices, Computers & Education, 58 (2012) 449-458.
[30]
A. Raman, Y. Don, Preservice teachers' acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model, International Educational Studies, 6 (2013) 157-164.
[31]
E. Rogers, Diffusion of innovation, The Free Press, New York, 2003.
[32]
K. Samuelowicz, J.D. Bain, Revisiting academics beliefs about teaching and learning, Higher Education, 41 (2001) 299-325.
[33]
J. Tondeur, R. Hermans, J. van Braak, M. Valcke, Exploring the link between teachers' educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom, Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (2008) 2541-2553.
[34]
D. Tubin, Typology of ICT implementation and technology applications, Computers in the Schools, 23 (2006) 85-98.
[35]
V. Venkatesh, H. Bala, Technology acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions, Decision Sciences, 39 (2008) 273-315.
[36]
V. Venkatesh, F.D. Davis, Atheoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46 (2000) 186-204.
[37]
V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, F.D. Davis, User-acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27 (2003) 425-478.
[38]
V. Venkatesh, J.Y.L. Thong, X. Xu, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Quarterly, 36 (2012) 157-178.
[39]
R. Wilke, S. Losh, Beyond beliefs: Preservice teachers' planned instructional strategies, Action in Teacher Education, 30 (2008) 64-73.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Adopt or abandonComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104951209:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Primary teachers’ attitudes towards using new technology and stimulating higher-order thinking in students: A profile analysisEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11413-w28:6(6347-6372)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Cultural heritage content development and dissemination through a participatory platform: lessons learned from in-service teachers’ perceptionEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11336-628:3(3513-3536)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers & Education
Computers & Education  Volume 114, Issue C
November 2017
309 pages

Publisher

Elsevier Science Ltd.

United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2017

Author Tags

  1. Improving classroom teaching
  2. Pedagogical issues
  3. Secondary education

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Adopt or abandonComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104951209:COnline publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2022)Primary teachers’ attitudes towards using new technology and stimulating higher-order thinking in students: A profile analysisEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11413-w28:6(6347-6372)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Cultural heritage content development and dissemination through a participatory platform: lessons learned from in-service teachers’ perceptionEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11336-628:3(3513-3536)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Does teacher’s data literacy and digital teaching competence influence empowering students in the classroom? Evidence from ChinaEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11274-328:3(2845-2867)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Investigating teachers’ information literacy and its differences in individuals and schools: a large-scale evaluation in ChinaEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-11271-628:3(3145-3172)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Exploring technology readiness and practices of kindergarten student-teachers in Saudi Arabia: A mixed-methods studyEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-022-10920-027:6(7851-7868)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • (2022)The coping of academic staff with an extreme situation: The transition from conventional teaching to online teachingEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-021-10675-027:1(267-289)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2020)Factors to Consider When Designing Multimedia CBL Tools in Health Professional ProgramsJournal of Cases on Information Technology10.4018/JCIT.202001010522:1(72-86)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020
  • (2020)Effective principal leadership influencing technology innovation in the classroomEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-020-10217-025:6(5321-5338)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020
  • (2019)Influences on purposeful implementation of ICT into the classroomEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-018-9760-024:1(63-77)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media