Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
technical-note

Should firms use digital work instructions?—Individual learning in an agile manufacturing setting

Published: 07 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

New technological innovations in robotics, automation, and digitization enable agile manufacturing, smaller lot sizes, and quicker changes to the product and the production process. In such environments, learning is important, since workers must learn new tasks and adapt to frequent changes quickly. In an experimental study, we compare digital work instructions with traditional paper‐based ones, the latter still being common in today's quality management systems. Our analysis is based on subjects working in the demonstration factory of a large German university in a realistic work environment; it, therefore, guarantees high internal and external validity. We show that digitally animated, interactive work instructions are an effective way to foster faster learning and enhanced performance when new manufacturing tasks are being carried out. Our results indicate that a combination of digital and traditional paper‐based instructions does not yield any advantages over a sole reliance on digital learning.

Highlights

Digital work instructions lead to superior manufacturing performance compared with paper‐based instructions.
A combination of digital and traditional paper‐based work instructions does not yield any advantages over a sole reliance on digital learning.
In agile manufacturing settings, companies should invest in digital learning.

References

[1]
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.
[2]
Alavi, S., Abd. Wahab, D., Muhamad, N., & Arbab Shirani, B. (2014). Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6273–6295.
[3]
Baumers, M., & Holweg, M. (2019). On the economics of additive manufacturing: Experimental findings. Journal of Operations Management, 65(8), 794–809.
[4]
Beatty, J. K., Thimling, D., & Walsh, T. (2004, November 16). Electronic work instruction object oriented system and method. Google Patents. https://www.google.com/patents/US6819965.
[5]
Benkard, C. L. (2000). Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. American Economic Review, 90(4), 1034–1054.
[6]
BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) (2015). Report on vocational education and training 2015. BMBF. Bonn. https://www.bmbf.de/upload_filestore/pub/Berufsbildungsbericht_2015_eng.pdf
[7]
Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
[8]
de Treville, S., Antonakis, J., & Edelson, N. M. (2005). Can standard operating procedures be motivating? Reconciling process variability issues and Behavioural outcomes. Total Quality Management, 16(2), 231–241.
[9]
Deater‐Deckard, K., Petrill, S. A., Thompson, L. A., & Dethorne, L. S. (2005). Fast‐track report ‐ a cross‐sectional behavioral genetic analysis of task persistence in the transition to middle childhood. Developmental Science, 3, 21–26.
[10]
Dong‐Sik, J. O., Kim, Y.‐W., Yang, U.‐Y., & Kim, K.‐H. (2012, April 26). Assembly process visualization apparatus and method. Google Patents. https://www.google.com/patents/US20120100520.
[11]
Euler, D. (1994). (Multi) Mediales Lernen‐Theoretische Fundierungen und Forschungsstand. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 22(4), 291–311.
[12]
Eysenck, H. J., & Thompson, W. (1966). The effects of distraction on pursuit rotor learning, performance and reminiscence. British Journal of Psychology, 57(1–2), 99–106.
[13]
Gilbert, A. (2016). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. In S. Lackey & R. Shumaker (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality: 8th international conference, VAMR 2016, held as part of HCI international 2016, Toronto, Canada, July 17–22, 2016 (pp. 375–385). Springer.
[14]
Goodell, K. H., Cao, C. G. L., & Schwaitzberg, S. D. (2006). Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 16(2), 94–98.
[15]
Goss, L. (2001, May 22). Manufacturing system and method for assembly of computer systems in a build‐to‐order environment. Google Patents. https://www.google.com/patents/US6236901.
[16]
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.
[17]
Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals, and Students' reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(1), 58–74.
[18]
Holmström, J., Holweg, M., Lawson, B., Pil, F. K., & Wagner, S. M. (2019). The digitalization of operations and supply chain management: Theoretical and methodological implications. Journal of Operations Management, 65(8), 728–734.
[19]
Jain, N. K., & Jain, V. K. (2001). Computer aided process planning for agile manufacturing environment. In A. Gunasekaran (Ed.), Agile manufacturing: The 21st century competitive strategy (pp. 515–534). Elsevier Science Ltd.
[20]
Kablan, Z., & Erden, M. (2008). Instructional efficiency of integrated and separated text with animated presentations in computer‐based science instruction. Computers in Education, 51(2), 660–668.
[21]
Kock, N. (2005). Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E‐communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(2), 117–130.
[22]
Kock, N. (2009). Information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psychology: An interdisciplinary review and theory integration framework. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 395–418.
[23]
Krauter, L. G., Eide, D. M., & Kersavage, K. K. (2016, December 6). Apparatus and method for automatic work instruction generation. Google Patents, https://www.google.com/patents/US20100175013.
[24]
Letmathe, P., & Rößler, M. (2016). Spillover effects of learning for production ramp‐ups. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on ramp‐up Management in Aachen, Germany (Vol. 51, pp. 111–115). Procedia CIRP.
[25]
Letmathe, P., & Rößler, M. (2019). Tacit knowledge transfer and spillover learning in ramp‐ups. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(9/10), 1099–1121.
[26]
Letmathe, P., & Schinner, M. (2017). Competence management in the age of cyber physical systems. In S. Jeschke, C. Brecher, H. Song, & D. B. Rawat (Eds.), Industrial internet of things (pp. 595–614). Springer.
[27]
Letmathe, P., Schweitzer, M., & Zielinski, M. (2012). How to learn new tasks: Shop floor performance effects of knowledge transfer and performance feedback. Journal of Operations Management, 30(3), 221–236.
[28]
Letmathe, P., & Zielinski, M. (2016). Determinants of feedback effectiveness in production planning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(7), 825–848.
[29]
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
[30]
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
[31]
Michas, I. C., & Berry, D. C. (2000). Learning a procedural task: Effectiveness of multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(6), 555–575.
[32]
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social Agency in Computer‐Based Teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177–213.
[33]
Nerdel, C. (2002). Die Wirkung von Animation und Simulation auf das Verständnis von stoffwechselphysiologischen Prozessen. (Doctoral Dissertation), Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu Kiel.
[34]
Ngu, B. H., Mit, E., Shahbodin, F., & Tuovinen, J. (2009). Chemistry problem solving instruction: A comparison of three computer‐based formats for learning from hierarchical network problem representations. Instructional Science, 37(1), 21–42.
[35]
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & ten Berge, J. M. T. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). McGraw‐Hill.
[36]
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem solving skill in statistics: A cognitive‐load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434.
[37]
Paas, F., Ayres, P., & Pachman, M. (2008). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 11–35). Information Age Publishing Inc.
[38]
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
[39]
Park, O.‐C., & Hopkins, R. (1992). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review. Instructional Science, 21(6), 427–449.
[40]
Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second‐order meta‐analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 450–461.
[41]
Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. Jossey‐Bass Publishers.
[42]
Schnotz, W., Böckheler, J., & Grzondziel, H. (1999). Individual and co‐operative learning with interactive animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 245–265.
[43]
Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293–305.
[44]
Senesac, C. J. (2017, May 3). Method and apparatus for providing visual assistance in aircraft assembly. Google Patents. https://www.google.com/patents/EP2778073A3?cl=en&hl=de.
[45]
Spangenberg, R. W. (1973). The motion variable in procedural learning. Audio‐Visual Communication Review, 21(4), 419–436.
[46]
Sun, Z.‐Y., Xiao, D.‐H., Wang, Y.‐J., & Xiao, Y.‐L. (2010, April 22). System and method for directing display of a standard operation procedure of an item using multimedia devices. Google Patents. https://www.google.com/patents/US20100100609.
[47]
Terwiesch, C., & Bohn, R. E. (2001). Learning and process improvement during production ramp‐up. International Journal of Production Economics, 70(1), 1–19.
[48]
Venkatesan, M. (1967). Laboratory experiments in marketing: The experimenter effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(2), 142–146.
[49]
Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3(4), 122–128.
[50]
Yin, Y., Stecke, K. E., Swink, M., & Kaku, I. (2017). Lessons from seru production on manufacturing competitively in a high cost environment. Journal of Operations Management, 49–51, 67–76.
[51]
Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: The drivers, conceps and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 33–43.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management  Volume 68, Issue 1
January 2022
129 pages
ISSN:0272-6963
EISSN:1873-1317
DOI:10.1002/joom.v68.1
Issue’s Table of Contents
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Publisher

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 07 October 2021

Author Tags

  1. agile manufacturing
  2. learning
  3. work instructions

Qualifiers

  • Technical-note

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media