Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making

Published: 01 January 2002 Publication History

Abstract

This study investigated Simon's behavioral decision-making theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors - reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web.

References

[1]
Bilal, D. (1998). Children's search processes in using World Wide Web search engines: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 35, 45-53.
[2]
Bilal, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: 1. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 646-665.
[3]
Brewington, B.E., & Cybenko, G. (2000). How dynamic is the Web? Computer Networks, 33(16), 257-276.
[4]
Chu, F.T. (1994). Reference service and bounded rationality: Helping students with research. College & Research Libraries, 55, 457-461.
[5]
Druin, A. (1999). Beginning a discussion about kids, technology, and design. In A. Druin (Ed.), The design of children's technology (pp. xiii-xxiii). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
[6]
Fidel, R., Davies, R.K., Douglass, M,H., Holder, J.K., Hopkins, C.J., Kushner, E.J., Miyagishima, B.K., & Toney, C.D. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 24-37.
[7]
Frey, J,H. (1991). The group interview in social research. Social Science Journal, 28, 175187.
[8]
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D.C. (1996). Reasoning the last and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-696.
[9]
Gilhooly, K.J. (1988). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
[10]
Gross, M. (1999). Imposed queries in the school library media center: A descriptive study. Library & Information Science Research, 21, 501-521.
[11]
Higgins, M. (1999). Meta-information, and time: Factors in human decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 132-139.
[12]
Hirsh, S.G. (1999). Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1265-1283.
[13]
Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[14]
Kafai, Y., & Bates, M.J. (1997). Internet Web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: Building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly, 25, 103-111.
[15]
Kleyle, R.M., & de Korvin, A. (1989). A unified model for data acquisition and decision making. Journal of Information Science, 15, 149-161.
[16]
Kleyle, R.M., & de Korvin, A. (1990). A belief function approach to information utilization in decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 569-580.
[17]
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361-371.
[18]
Kuhlthau, C.C. (I 993a). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49, 339-355.
[19]
Kuhlthau, C.C. (l993b). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
[20]
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1998, Winter). Literacy and learning for the information age. EMAnations, 311.
[21]
Large, A., & Beheshti, J. (2000). The Web as a classroom resource: Reactions from the users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1069-1080.
[22]
Laurel, B. (1990). Introduction. In B. Laurel (Ed), The art of humancomputer interface design. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
[23]
Lincoln, Y.S., & Cuba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[24]
Lindloff, T.R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[25]
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
[26]
Miles, MB., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[27]
Morgan, D.L., (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[28]
Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
[29]
Oliver, R., & Oliver, H. (1997). Using context to promote learning from information-seeking tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 519-526.
[30]
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic.
[31]
Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic.
[32]
Qualitative Solutions and Research. (1999). The QSR NUDIST VIVO. {Computer software}. Melbourne, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research.
[33]
Rouse, A., & Dick, M. (1994). The use of NUDIST, a computerized analytical tool, to support qualitative information systems research. Information Technology & People, 7(3), 50-62.
[34]
Schacter, J., Chung, G.K.W.K., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840-849.
[35]
Schwartz, C.A. (1989). Book selection, collection development, and bounded rationality. College & Research Libraries, 50, 328-343.
[36]
Seidman, I.E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Columbia Teachers College.
[37]
Simon, H.A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
[38]
Simon, H.A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129-138.
[39]
Simon, H.A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.
[40]
Stewart, D.W., & Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[41]
Tyszka, T. (1989). Information and evaluation processes in decision making. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski. & E. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[42]
Wang, P., & Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 115133.
[43]
Weiss, R.S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.
[44]
Wester, F. (1996). The analysis of qualitative interviews. In I. Muso, & F. Wester (Eds.), The deliberate dialogue. Brussels: VUB University Press.
[45]
Yovits, M.C., & Foulk, C.R. (1985), Experiments and analysis of information use and value in a decision-making context. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 63-81.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An AI-Resilient Text Rendering Technique for Reading and Skimming DocumentsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642699(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Supporting Sensemaking of Large Language Model Outputs at ScaleProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642139(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2021)Adaptation in Information Search and Decision-Making under Time ConstraintsProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3406522.3446030(95-105)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
        Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology  Volume 53, Issue 1
        January 1, 2002
        54 pages

        Publisher

        John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

        United States

        Publication History

        Published: 01 January 2002

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)An AI-Resilient Text Rendering Technique for Reading and Skimming DocumentsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642699(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Supporting Sensemaking of Large Language Model Outputs at ScaleProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642139(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2021)Adaptation in Information Search and Decision-Making under Time ConstraintsProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3406522.3446030(95-105)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2021
        • (2021)Big Data, Scarce Attention and Decision-Making QualityComputational Economics10.1007/s10614-018-9798-557:3(827-856)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
        • (2021)Teens’ Conceptual Understanding of Web Search Engines: The Case of Google Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs)Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case Studies10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_18(253-270)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
        • (2020)Exploring factors affecting renewal and stopping reasons in cross‐session searchProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.26757:1Online publication date: 22-Oct-2020
        • (2019)When search is (mis)learningProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/pra2.2018.1450550103955:1(357-366)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019
        • (2019)The Things We Talk About When We Talk About BrowsingJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2420070:12(1383-1394)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019
        • (2017)There's a creepy guy on the other end at Google!Information Retrieval10.1007/s10791-017-9306-x20:5(403-432)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017
        • (2016)Toward an understanding of fiction and information behaviorProceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology10.5555/3017447.3017513(1-10)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2016
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media