Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-31365-3_3guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

SAT and SMT are still resolution: questions and challenges

Published: 26 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

The aim of this invited talk is to discuss strengths, limitations and challenges around one of the simplest yet most powerful practical automated deduction formalisms, namely propositional SAT and its extensions. We will see some of the reasons why CDCL SAT solvers are so effective for finding solutions to so diverse real-world problems, using a single fully automatic push-button strategy, and, by extending them to SAT Modulo Theories (SMT), also to optimization problems and problems with complex (e.g., arithmetic) constraints for which a full encoding into SAT would be too large and/or inefficient. We will give some examples of trade-offs regarding full SAT encodings vs SMT theory solvers, and discuss why SAT and even SMT are just binary resolution strategies, the consequences of this fact, and possible ways to overcome it. Many aspects of the discussion carry over to first-order logic and beyond.

References

[1]
Audemard, G., Katsirelos, G., Simon, L.: A restriction of extended resolution for clause learning sat solvers. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI (2010).
[2]
Asín, R., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E.: Cardinality networks: a theoretical and empirical study. Constraints 16(2), 195-221 (2011).
[3]
Abío, I., Stuckey, P.J.: Conflict-directed lazy decomposition (submitted, 2012).
[4]
Biere, A., Heule, M.J.H., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185. IOS Press (February 2009).
[5]
Barrett, C., Sebastiani, R., Seshia, S.A., Tinelli, C.: Satisfiability Modulo Theories. In: Biere, et al. (eds.) {BHvMW09}, vol. 185, ch. 26, pp. 825-885 (February 2009).
[6]
Huang, J.: Extended clause learning. Artif. Intell. 174(15), 1277-1284 (2010).
[7]
Larrosa, J., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E.: A framework for certified boolean branch-and-bound optimization. J. Autom. Reasoning 46(1), 81-102 (2011).
[8]
Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A.: On SAT Modulo Theories and Optimization Problems. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 156-169. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
[9]
Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Tinelli, C.: Solving SAT and SAT Modulo Theories: from an Abstract Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland Procedure to DPLL(T). Journal of the ACM 53(6), 937-977 (2006).
[10]
Ohrimenko, O., Stuckey, P.J., Codish, M.: Propagation via lazy clause generation. Constraints 14(3), 357-391 (2009).
[11]
Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Validating SAT Solvers Using an Independent Resolution-Based Checker: Practical Implementations and Other Applications. In: 2003 Conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference, DATE 2003, pp. 10880-10885. IEEE Computer Society (2003).

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)A Scalable Approach to Exact Resource-Constrained Scheduling Based on a Joint SDC and SAT FormulationProceedings of the 2018 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays10.1145/3174243.3174268(137-146)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
IJCAR'12: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Automated Reasoning
June 2012
568 pages
ISBN:9783642313646
  • Editors:
  • Bernhard Gramlich,
  • Dale Miller,
  • Uli Sattler

Sponsors

  • Univ. of Manchester: University of Manchester
  • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 26 June 2012

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)A Scalable Approach to Exact Resource-Constrained Scheduling Based on a Joint SDC and SAT FormulationProceedings of the 2018 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays10.1145/3174243.3174268(137-146)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2018

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media