Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-642-25535-9_20guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

QoS-Based task scheduling in crowdsourcing environments

Published: 05 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has emerged as an important paradigm in human-problem solving techniques on the Web. One application of crowdsourcing is to outsource certain tasks to the crowd that are difficult to implement as solutions based on software services only. Another benefit of crowdsourcing is the on-demand allocation of a flexible workforce. Businesses may outsource certain tasks to the crowd based on workload variations. The paper addresses the monitoring of crowd members' characteristics and the effective use of monitored data to improve the quality of work. Here we propose the extensions of standards such as Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) to settle quality guarantees between crowd consumers and the crowdsourcing platform. Based on negotiated agreements, we provide a skill-based crowd scheduling algorithm. We evaluate our approach through simulations.

References

[1]
Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., Mishne, G.: Finding high-quality content in social media. In: WSDM 2008, pp. 183-194. ACM (2008).
[2]
Agrawal, A., et al.: WS-BPEL Extension for People (BPEL4People) (2007).
[3]
Amazon Mechnical Turk (May 2011), http://www.mturk.com.
[4]
Brabham, D.: Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence 14(1), 75 (2008).
[5]
Caprara, A., Monaci, M., Toth, P.: Models and algorithms for a staff scheduling problem. Math. Program. 98(1-3), 445-476 (2003).
[6]
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81(2), 591-646 (2009).
[7]
Che, Y.: Design competition through multidimensional auctions. The RAND Journal of Economics 24(4), 668-680 (1993).
[8]
Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., Halevy, A.Y.: Crowdsourcing systems on the worldwide web. Commun. ACM 54, 86-96 (2011).
[9]
Ernst, A.T., Jiang, H., Krishnamoorthy, M., Sier, D.: Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models. European Journal of Operational Research 153(1), 3-27 (2004), timetabling and Rostering.
[10]
Ford, M., et al.: Web Services Human Task (WS-HumanTask), Version 1.0. (2007).
[11]
Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing (June 2006), http://www.wired.com/.
[12]
Ipeirotis, P.G.: Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk Marketplace. SSRN eLibrary 17(2), 16-21 (2010).
[13]
Kern, R., Thies, H., Satzger, G.: Statistical Quality Control for Human-Based Electronic Services. In: Maglio, P.P., Weske, M., Yang, J., Fantinato, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6470, pp. 243-257. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
[14]
Khazankin, R., Schall, D., Dustdar, S.: Adaptive request prioritization in dynamic service-oriented systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Services Computing (to appear, 2011).
[15]
La Vecchia, G., Cisternino, A.: Collaborative Workforce, Business Process Crowdsourcing as an Alternative of BPO. In: Daniel, F., Facca, F.M. (eds.) ICWE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6385, pp. 425-430. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
[16]
Leymann, F.: Workflow-Based Coordination and Cooperation in a Service World. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., et al. (eds.) OTM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 2-16. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
[17]
LiveOps (May 2011), https://www.livework.com/.
[18]
Parkes, D., Kalagnanam, J.: Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Science 51(3), 435-451 (2005).
[19]
Schall, D., Dustdar, S.: Dynamic Context-Sensitive Pagerank for Expertise Mining. In: Bolc, L., Makowski, M., Wierzbicki, A. (eds.) SocInfo 2010. LNCS, vol. 6430, pp. 160-175. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
[20]
Sousa, J., Poladian, V., Garlan, D., Schmerl, B., Shaw, M.: Task-based adaptation for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 36(3), 328-340 (2006).
[21]
Vukovic, M.: Crowdsourcing for Enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Congress on Services, pp. 686-692. IEEE (2009).
[22]
Yahoo! Answers (May 2011), http://answers.yahoo.com/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning to Schedule Online Tasks with Bandit FeedbackProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663061(1975-1983)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2021)MCDM Approach for Assigning Task to the Workers by Selected Features Based on Multiple Criteria in CrowdsourcingScientific Programming10.1155/2021/46007642021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Impact of Task Cycle Pattern on Project Success in Software CrowdsourcingHuman Interface and the Management of Information. Information-Rich and Intelligent Environments10.1007/978-3-030-78361-7_22(300-311)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
ICSOC'11: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Service-Oriented Computing
December 2011
680 pages
ISBN:9783642255342
  • Editors:
  • Gerti Kappel,
  • Zakaria Maamar,
  • Hamid R. Motahari-Nezhad

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 05 December 2011

Author Tags

  1. QoS agreements
  2. crowdsourcing
  3. scheduling
  4. skill monitoring

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learning to Schedule Online Tasks with Bandit FeedbackProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663061(1975-1983)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2021)MCDM Approach for Assigning Task to the Workers by Selected Features Based on Multiple Criteria in CrowdsourcingScientific Programming10.1155/2021/46007642021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Impact of Task Cycle Pattern on Project Success in Software CrowdsourcingHuman Interface and the Management of Information. Information-Rich and Intelligent Environments10.1007/978-3-030-78361-7_22(300-311)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
  • (2019)Deadline-Aware Fair Scheduling for Multi-Tenant Crowd-Powered SystemsACM Transactions on Social Computing10.1145/33010032:1(1-29)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Ant Colony Optimization to Reduce Schedule Acceleration in Crowdsourcing Software DevelopmentHuman Interface and the Management of Information. Information in Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-030-22649-7_23(286-300)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
  • (2018)Crowdsourcing Task Assignment with Online Profile LearningOn the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2018 Conferences10.1007/978-3-030-02610-3_13(226-242)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2018
  • (2016)Scheduling Human Intelligence Tasks in Multi-Tenant Crowd-Powered SystemsProceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2872427.2883030(855-865)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2016
  • (2016)Assignment Techniques for Crowdsourcing Sensitive TasksProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2818048.2835202(836-847)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
  • (2013)Participatory Service Design Based on User-Centered QoSProceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 0110.1109/WI-IAT.2013.205(465-472)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2013
  • (2012)Predicting qos in scheduled crowdsourcingProceedings of the 24th international conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_30(460-472)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2012

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media