Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_24guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Evaluating Usability of M-Learning Application in the Context of Higher Education Institute

Published: 17 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In a system development process, usability evaluation is a crucial part of the process. The purpose of this paper is to test the usability of new developed application called “DARSGAH” for getting optimum outcomes from m-learning (Mobile Learning) technology. This application provides learning opportunities to University students. Initially, pilot test was conducted with 10 participants. After slight word refinement and minor changes in the application full scale usability test was conducted with other 100 participants who were selected randomly from the University by generating random numbers (student IDs) using SPSS. The data was collected using System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire immediately after the test, to obtain students’ overall perception about the application. The findings revealed that the application is user friendly, effective, and efficient and the users were satisfied as the overall average score of SUS is 84. The total task completion rate was 100 % which means that the application was very effective.

References

[1]
Ko EH, Chiu DK, Lo P, and Ho KK Comparative study on m-learning usage among LIS students from Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan J. Acad. Librariansh. 2015 41 5 567-577
[2]
Althunibat A Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015 52 65-71
[3]
Gong Chao.: (2009) Human-computer interaction: the usability test methods and design principles in the human-computer interface design. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, ICCSIT 2009, pp. 283–285, 8–11 August 2009
[4]
Bandi, A., Heeler, P.: Usability testing: a software engineering perspective. In: 2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)
[5]
Cheng, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, T., Zhu, C., Zhou, W.: Mobile compatibility testing using multi-objective genetic algorithm. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE), pp. 302–307. IEEE (2015)
[6]
Zhang, T., Gao, J., Cheng, J., Uehara, T.: Compatibility testing service for mobile applications. In: IEEE Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering, pp. 179–186 (2015)
[7]
Brooke J SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale Usability Eval. Ind. 1996 189 194 4-7
[8]
Tullis, T., Stetson, J.: A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In: Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association (UPA) 2004 Conference, pp. 7–11 (2004)
[9]
Fetaji B, Ebibi M, and Fetaji M Assessing effectiveness in mobile learning by devising MLUAT (Mobile Learning Usability Attribute Testing) methodology Int. J. Comput. Commun. 2011 5 3 178-187
[10]
Alelaiwi A and Hossain MS Evaluating and testing user interfaces for e-learning system: blackboard usability testing J. Inf. Eng. Appl. 2015 5 1 23-30
[11]
Summers, S., Watt, A.: Quick and dirty usability testing in the technical communication classroom. In: Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2015 IEEE International, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2015)
[12]
Lee KB and Salman R The design and development of mobile collaborative learning application using android J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Educ. 2012 1 1 1-8
[13]
Raptis, D., Tselios, N., Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B.: Does size matter?: investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 127–136. ACM (2013)
[14]
Baillie, L., Morton, L.: Designing quick & dirty applications for mobiles: making the case for the utility of HCI principles. In: Proceedings of the ITI 2009 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, ITI2009, pp. 293–298. IEEE (2009)

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigating factors affecting teachers' training through mobile learning: Task technology fit perspectiveEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12434-929:12(14553-14589)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Study of the Effectiveness of Gamification Design Applied to Chinese Medicine Learning AppHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60428-7_13(177-193)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • (2021)ISO 9241-11 and SUS Measurement for Usability Assessment of Dropshipping Sales Management ApplicationProceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications10.1145/3457784.3457794(70-74)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating Usability of M-Learning Application in the Context of Higher Education Institute
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Third International Conference, LCT 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17-22, 2016, Proceedings
      Jul 2016
      728 pages
      ISBN:978-3-319-39482-4
      DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1

      Publisher

      Springer-Verlag

      Berlin, Heidelberg

      Publication History

      Published: 17 July 2016

      Author Tags

      1. M-learning
      2. Usability testing
      3. System Usability Scale (SUS)
      4. Usefulness
      5. DARSGAH
      6. Mobile application

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Investigating factors affecting teachers' training through mobile learning: Task technology fit perspectiveEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-12434-929:12(14553-14589)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Study of the Effectiveness of Gamification Design Applied to Chinese Medicine Learning AppHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60428-7_13(177-193)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
      • (2021)ISO 9241-11 and SUS Measurement for Usability Assessment of Dropshipping Sales Management ApplicationProceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications10.1145/3457784.3457794(70-74)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2021
      • (2020)Usability Study of Data Entry Design Patterns for Mobile ApplicationsComputational Collective Intelligence10.1007/978-3-030-63007-2_70(888-901)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2020
      • (2019)Learn Chinese in Sindhi: App Development and EvaluationLearning and Collaboration Technologies. Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments for Learning and Collaboration10.1007/978-3-030-21817-1_8(99-109)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
      • (2019)Comparative Analysis of Usability of Data Entry Design Patterns for Mobile ApplicationsIntelligent Information and Database Systems10.1007/978-3-030-14799-0_63(737-750)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2019

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media