Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8_16guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Gamification and Family Housework Applications

Published: 10 March 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This conceptual work represents an initial exploration into a little researched area, namely app design for families. We explore how gamification is incorporated in applications that target family housework, also known as chores. During the last five years an increasing number of apps aim to transform routine based housework into entertaining activities. Many parents think it is important that children, at an early age, learn about family values and responsibilities that comes with the role as a family member. However, a gamified approach towards housework can influence family interaction in both positive and negative ways. We analyze a selection of so-called chore apps by building on an existing classification framework for educational apps and applying concepts of game design elements. Our findings show (1) that existing apps tend to be mostly instructive and partly manipulable, (2) that they tend to focus on external rather than intrinsic motivation, (3) that they target family members individually, rather than the family as a whole. We discuss the results from a motivation perspective by drawing attention to three concepts that relate to intrinsic motivation: Competence, autonomy and relatedness.

References

[1]
Deterding, S., et al.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Pro. MindTrek 2011, pp. 9–15. ACM Press (2011)
[2]
Hook, J.L.: Gender Inequality in the Welfare State: Sex Segregation in Housework, 1965–2003. American Journal of Sociology 115(5), 1480–1523 (2010)
[3]
Bernhardt, E., Noack, T., Lyngstad, T.H.: Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: advancing the gender revolution. Journal of European Social Policy 18(3), 275–288 (2008)
[4]
Solberg, A.: Negotiating childhood: Changing constructions of age for Norwegian children. In: James, A., Prout, A. (eds.) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, pp. 126–144. Falmer Press, London (1997)
[5]
Miller, P., Bowd, J.: Family time economies and democratic division of work. Journal of Family Studies 20(2), 128–147 (2014)
[6]
Cunningham, M.: Parental Influences on the Gendered Division of Housework. American Sociological Review 66(2), 184–203 (2001)
[7]
Bjering, A.B.: Design of a digital application to motivate families to do domestic chores together (Master thesis), Department of Product Design. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2015)
[8]
Bringsværd, T.Å., Soli, T.: Når to skal rydde. Gyldendal, Oslo (2006)
[9]
Wolde, G., Birke, E.: Emma støvsuger. Aschehoug, Oslo (2002)
[10]
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media (1985)
[11]
Werbach, K., Hunter, D.: For the win: how game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press, Philadelphia (2012)
[12]
Skinner, B.F.: The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Appleton-Century, Oxford (1938)
[13]
Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 248–287 (1991)
[14]
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1), 68–78 (2000)
[15]
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1), 54–67 (2000)
[16]
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)
[17]
McGrath, J., Bates, B.: The little book of big management theories... and how to use them. Pearson, Harlow (2013)
[18]
Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16(2), 250–279 (1976)
[19]
Herzberg, F.I.: Work and the nature of man. World Pub. Co., Cleveland (1966)
[20]
Skaalvik, E.M., Skaalvik, S.: Skolens læringsmiljø: selvopfattelse, motivasjon og læringsstrategier. Akademisk Forlag, København (2007)
[21]
Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2), 191–215 (1977)
[22]
Covington, M.V.: The Self-Worth Theory of Achievement Motivation: Findings and Implications. The Elementary School Journal 85(1), 5–20 (1984)
[23]
Holloway, D., Green, L., Livingstone, S.: Zero to eight. Young children and their internet use. EU Kids Online, London (2013)
[24]
Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by Design: implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media, Sabastobol (2011)
[25]
Xu, F., Weber, J., Buhalis, D.: Gamification in tourism. In: Xiang, Z., Tussyadiah, I. (eds.) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2014, pp. 525–537. Springer (2013)
[26]
Juul, J.: The game, the player, the world: Looking for a heart of gameness. PLURAIS-Revista Multidisciplinar da UNEB 1(2) (2010)
[27]
Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
[28]
McGonigal, J.: Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Vintage books, London (2012)
[29]
Reeves, B., Read, J.L.: Total engagement: using games and virtual worlds to change the way people work and businesses compete. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2009)
[30]
Schell, J.: The Pleasure Revolution: Why games Will Lead the Way. [Video]. November 2011. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PkUgCiHuH8&feature=youtu.be
[31]
Reimer, C., Play to order: what huizinga has to say about gamification. In: Pro. Games + Learning + Society Conference, pp. 272–274. ETC Press (2011)
[32]
Huizinga, J.: Homo ludens: a study of the play-element in culture. Beacon Press, Boston (1955)
[33]
Robertson, M. Can’t play, won’t play, October 2010 [cited 2015 05.05.]. http://hideandseek.net/2010/10/06/cant-play-wont-play/
[34]
Goodwin, K., Highfield, K.: iTouch and iLearn: an examination of “educational” apps. In: Early Education and Technology for Children Conference (2012)
[35]
Goodwin, K., Highfield, K.: A framework for examining technologies and early mathematics learning. In: Reconceptualizing Early Mathematics Learning, pp. 205–226. Springer (2013)

Index Terms

  1. Gamification and Family Housework Applications
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2015
    593 pages
    ISBN:978-3-319-24588-1
    DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8

    Publisher

    Springer-Verlag

    Berlin, Heidelberg

    Publication History

    Published: 10 March 2022

    Author Tags

    1. Gamification
    2. housework
    3. family
    4. motivation
    5. children
    6. parents

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media