Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-28241-6_29guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

FACADE: Fake Articles Classification and Decision Explanation

Published: 02 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The daily use of social networks and the resulting dissemination of disinformation over those media have greatly contributed to the rise of the fake news phenomenon as a global problem. Several manual and automatic approaches are currently in place to try to tackle and defuse this issue, which is becoming nearly uncontrollable. In this paper, we propose Facade, a fake news detection system that aims to provide a complete solution for classifying news articles and explain the motivation behind every prediction. The system is designed with a cascading architecture composed of two classification pipelines dealing with either low-level or high-level descriptors, with the overall goal of achieving a consistent confidence score on each outcome. In addition, the system is equipped with an explainable user interface through which fact-checkers and content managers can visualise in detail the features leading to a certain prediction and have the possibility for manual cross-checking.

References

[8]
Allcott H and Gentzkow M Social media and fake news in the 2016 election J. Econ. Perspect. 2017 31 2 211-36
[9]
Altmann A, Toloşi L, Sander O, and Lengauer T Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure Bioinformatics 2010 26 10 1340-1347
[10]
Clayton K et al. Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media Polit. Behav. 2020 42 4 1073-1095
[11]
Dale R NLP in a post-truth world Nat. Lang. Eng. 2017 23 2 319-324
[12]
Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, and Flammini A The rise of social bots Commun. ACM 2016 59 7 96-104
[13]
Goldstein A, Kapelner A, Bleich J, and Pitkin E Peeking inside the black box: visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 2015 24 1 44-65
[14]
Ha L, Andreu Perez L, and Ray R Mapping recent development in scholarship on fake news and misinformation, 2008 to 2017: disciplinary contribution, topics, and impact Am. Behav. Sci. 2021 65 2 290-315
[15]
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, and Larson HJ Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA Nat. Hum. Behav. 2021 5 3 337-348
[16]
Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)
[17]
McGonagle T “Fake news” False fears or real concerns? Neth. Q. Hum. Rights 2017 35 4 203-209
[18]
Molina MD, Sundar SS, Le T, and Lee D “Fake news” is not simply false information: a concept explication and taxonomy of online content Am. Behav. Sci. 2021 65 2 180-212
[19]
Pérez-Rosas, V., Kleinberg, B., Lefevre, A., Mihalcea, R.: Automatic detection of fake news. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07104 (2017)
[20]
Shu, K., Cui, L., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: defend: explainable fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 395–405 (2019)
[21]
Yang, F., et al.: XFake: explainable fake news detector with visualizations. In: The World Wide Web Conference, pp. 3600–3604 (2019)
[22]
Zhang X and Ghorbani AA An overview of online fake news: characterization, detection, and discussion Inf. Process. Manag. 2020 57 2
[23]
Zhang, X., Cao, J., Li, X., Sheng, Q., Zhong, L., Shu, K.: Mining dual emotion for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pp. 3465–3476 (2021)
[24]
Zhou X, Jain A, Phoha VV, and Zafarani R Fake news early detection: a theory-driven model Digit. Threats Res. Pract. 2020 1 2 1-25
[25]
Zhou, X., Zafarani, R., Shu, K., Liu, H.: Fake news: fundamental theories, detection strategies and challenges. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 836–837 (2019)
[26]
Zuo, C., Karakas, A., Banerjee, R.: A hybrid recognition system for check-worthy claims using heuristics and supervised learning. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2125 (2018)

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Advances in Information Retrieval: 45th European Conference on Information Retrieval, ECIR 2023, Dublin, Ireland, April 2–6, 2023, Proceedings, Part III
Apr 2023
634 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-28240-9
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-28241-6

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 02 April 2023

Author Tags

  1. Fake news detection
  2. Feature engineering
  3. Explainability

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media