Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-17120-8_52guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Automatic Academic Paper Rating Based on Modularized Hierarchical Attention Network

Published: 24 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Automatic academic paper rating (AAPR) remains a difficult but useful task to automatically predict whether to accept or reject a paper. Having found more task-specific structure features of academic papers, we present a modularized hierarchical attention network (MHAN) to predict paper quality. MHAN uses a three-level hierarchical attention network to shorten the sequence for each level. In the network, the modularized parameter distinguishes the semantics of functional chapters. And a label-smoothing mechanism is used as a loss function to avoid inappropriate labeling. Compared with MHCNN and plain HAN on an AAPR dataset, MHAN achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 65.33%. Ablation experiments show that the proposed methods are effective.

References

[1]
Kang, D., et al.: A dataset of peer reviews (PeerRead): collection, insights and NLP applications. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pp. 1647–1661 (2018)
[2]
Yang, P., Sun, X., Li, W., Ma, S.: Automatic academic paper rating based on modularized hierarchical convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp. 496–502 (2018)
[3]
Qiao Feng, Xu Lizhen, and Han Xiaowei Meng Xiaofeng, Li Ruixuan, Wang Kanliang, Niu Baoning, Wang Xin, and Zhao Gansen Modularized and attention-based recurrent convolutional neural network for automatic academic paper aspect scoring Web Information Systems and Applications 2018 Cham Springer 68-76
[4]
Leng, Y., Yu, L., Xiong, J.: DeepReviewer: collaborative grammar and innovation neural network for automatic paper review. In: 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 395–403 (2019)
[5]
Skorikov, M., Momen, S.: Machine learning approach to predicting the acceptance of academic papers. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industry 4.0, Artificial Intelligence, and Communications Technology (IAICT). IEEE (2020)
[6]
Vincent-Lamarre P and Larivière V Textual analysis of artificial intelligence manuscripts reveals features associated with peer review outcome Quant. Sci. Stud. 2021 2 2 662-677
[7]
Shen, A., Salehi, B., Baldwin, T., Qi, J.: A joint model for multimodal document quality assessment. In: 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 107–110. IEEE (2019)
[8]
Hochreiter S and Schmidhuber J Long short-term memory Neural Comput. 1997 9 8 1735-1780
[9]
Cho, K., et al.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation (2014)
[10]
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)
[11]
Kenton, J.D.M.W.C., Toutanova, L.K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 4171–4186 (2019)
[12]
Yang, Z., Yang, D., Dyer, C., He, X., Smola, A., Hovy, E.: Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1480–1489 (2016)
[13]
Beltagy, I., Peters, M.E., Cohan, A.: Longformer: the long-document transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05150 (2020)
[14]
Zaheer, M., et al.: Big bird: transformers for longer sequences. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 17283–17297 (2020)
[15]
Langford J and Guzdial M The arbitrariness of reviews, and advice for school administrators Commun. ACM 2015 58 4 12-13
[16]
Lin, J., Song, J., Zhou, Z., Shi, X.: Automated scholarly paper review: possibility and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07533 (2021)
[17]
Shibayama S, Yin D, and Matsumoto K Measuring novelty in science with word embedding PLoS ONE 2021 16 7
[18]
Daudaravicius, V.: Automated evaluation of scientific writing: AESW shared task proposal. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pp. 56–63 (2015)
[19]
Springstein, M., Müller-Budack, E., Ewerth, R.: QuTI! quantifying text-image consistency in multimodal documents. In: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 2575–2579 (2021)
[20]
Hou, Y., Jochim, C., Gleize, M., Bonin, F., Ganguly, D.: TDMSci: a specialized corpus for scientific literature entity tagging of tasks datasets and metrics. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pp. 707–714 (2021)
[21]
Gupta, Y., et al.: The effect of pretraining on extractive summarization for scientific documents. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, pp. 73–82 (2021)
[22]
Wang, Q., Zeng, Q., Huang, L., Knight, K., Ji, H., Rajani, N.F.: ReviewRobot: explainable paper review generation based on knowledge synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pp. 384–397 (2020)
[23]
Yuan, W., Liu, P., Neubig, G.: Can we automate scientific reviewing? arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00176 (2021)
[24]
de Buy Wenniger, G.M., van Dongen, T., Aedmaa, E., Kruitbosch, H.T., Valentijn, E.A., Schomaker, L.: Structure-tags improve text classification for scholarly document quality prediction. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, pp. 158–167 (2020)
[25]
Huang, J.B.: Deep paper gestalt. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08775 (2018)
[26]
Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1746–1751. Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar (2014)

Index Terms

  1. Automatic Academic Paper Rating Based on Modularized Hierarchical Attention Network
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Guide Proceedings
        Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing: 11th CCF International Conference, NLPCC 2022, Guilin, China, September 24–25, 2022, Proceedings, Part I
        Sep 2022
        877 pages
        ISBN:978-3-031-17119-2
        DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-17120-8
        • Editors:
        • Wei Lu,
        • Shujian Huang,
        • Yu Hong,
        • Xiabing Zhou

        Publisher

        Springer-Verlag

        Berlin, Heidelberg

        Publication History

        Published: 24 September 2022

        Author Tags

        1. Automatic academic paper rating
        2. Modularized
        3. Hierarchical

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media