Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-61672-3_12guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

In the Footsteps of Learning: A Comparison of Robotic and Human Instructor Movement in the Classroom

Published: 29 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The movement of instructors in the classroom is more than simply walking about; it is a carefully choreographed ballet that includes or excludes students, shifts the focus of the entire classroom, and manipulates student behavior. Our work explores the impact of using a telepresence robot as an instructor avatar on the instructor’s movement and resting position patterns in a real-world classroom. We use heatmaps to identify high and low usage traffic patterns and to analyze the resting positions instructors use to monitor or engage with the class.
The movement and resting positions of the instructor have a profound impact on student engagement, discipline, and on-task behavior. Seating arrangements have an inevitable impact on how an instructor can move through the classroom. We examine how, in a group work scenario in a local high school, a horse shoe arrangement of desks is navigated by both co-situated human instructors and by those same instructors when they are remote and using a telepresence robot for instruction. We use the lens of spatial pedagogy and embodied pedagogy to evaluate how an telepresence embodiment differs from a co-located one.
Our results show that the telepresence embodiment has a significant impact on both movement and resting position. It promotes use of the periphery of the classroom and the Supervisory Space, reduces dependence on the Authoritative Space, and shifts resting positions from the Authoritative space to the Surveillance space. We also share some insights on designing a classroom for more effective telepresence use.

References

[1]
Arends, R.: Learning to Teach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education (2014)
[2]
Van den Berghe R, Verhagen J, Oudgenoeg-Paz O, Van der Ven S, and Leseman P Social robots for language learning: a review Rev. Educ. Res. 2019 89 2 259-295
[3]
Bonus, M., Riordan, L.: Increasing student on-task behavior through the use of specific seating arrangements. Dissertations/Theses Reports (1998)
[4]
Burbules, N.C., Bruce, B.C.: Theory and research on teaching as dialogue (2001)
[5]
Capello, S.A., Gyimah-Concepcion, M., Buckley-Hughes, B.: Using telepresence robots for doctoral education: student and faculty experiences. Am. J. Distance Educ. 1–15 (2022)
[6]
Cheong Yin Mei, C., Buai Chin, H., Taib, F.: Instructional proxemics and its impact on classroom teaching and learning. Int. J. Mod. Lang. Appl. Linguist. 1(1), 69–85 (2017)
[7]
Denny RK, Epstein MH, and Rose E Direct observation of adolescents with serious emotional disturbance and their nonhandicapped peers in mainstream vocational education classrooms Behav. Disord. 1992 18 1 33-41
[8]
Dixon M and Senior K Appearing pedagogy: from embodied learning and teaching to embodied pedagogy Pedagogy Cult. Soc. 2011 19 3 473-484
[9]
Estola E and Elbaz-Luwisch F Teaching bodies at work J. Curriculum Stud. 2003 35 6 697-719
[10]
Gleason B and Greenhow C Hybrid education: the potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication Online Learn. J. 2017 21 4 159-176
[11]
Gunter PL, Shores RE, Jack SL, Rasmussen SK, and Flowers J On the move using teacher/student proximity to improve students’ behavior Teach. Except. Child. 1995 28 1 12-14
[12]
Hall, E.T.: The Hidden Dimension, vol. 609. Anchor (1966)
[13]
Hegna HM and Ørbæk T Traces of embodied teaching and learning: a review of empirical studies in higher education Teach. High. Educ. 2021 29 420-421
[14]
Hordemann, G., Natarajarathinam, M., Chu, S.L., Kuttolamadom, M., Quek, F., Okundaye, O.J.: Everybody needs somebody to teach: Embodiment, telecommunication, and telepresence in stem learning. In: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access (2020)
[15]
Hordemann, G., Quek, F., Powell, L.: Reaching across the communication gap: evaluating how augmented reality shared gestural spaces impact gesture and language usage. In: 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2023)
[16]
Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., Senft, E., Belpaeme, T.: Social robot tutoring for child second language learning. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), pp. 231–238. IEEE (2016)
[17]
Lemov, D.: Teach like a Champion: 49 Techniques that Put Students on the Path to College (K-12). Wiley (2010)
[18]
Leoste, J., Virkus, S., Kasuk, T., Talisainen, A., Kangur, K., Tolmos, P.: Aspects of using telepresence robot in a higher education STEAM workshop. In: Pardede, E., Delir Haghighi, P., Khalil, I., Kotsis, G. (eds.) International Conference on Information Integration and Web, pp. 18–28. Springer (2022).
[19]
Leoste J, Virkus S, Talisainen A, Tammemäe K, Kangur K, and Petriashvili I Higher education personnel’s perceptions about telepresence robots Front. Robot. AI 2022 9 976836
[20]
Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 34 (2012)
[21]
Lim FV, O’Halloran KL, and Podlasov A Spatial pedagogy: mapping meanings in the use of classroom space Camb. J. Educ. 2012 42 2 235-251
[22]
Martinec R Interpersonal resources in action Semiotica 2001 2001 135 117-145
[23]
Marx A, Fuhrer U, and Hartig T Effects of classroom seating arrangements on children’s question-asking Learning Environ. Res. 1999 2 249-263
[24]
McArthur JA Matching instructors and spaces of learning: the impact of space on behavioral, affective and cognitive learning J. Learn. Spaces 2015 4 1 1-16
[25]
Moore DW Variation in question rate as a function of position in the classroom Educ. Psychol. 1984 4 3 233-248
[26]
Newhart, V.A., Olson, J.S.: My student is a robot: how schools manage telepresence experiences for students. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 342–347 (2017)
[27]
Newhart VA, Warschauer M, and Sender L Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: an exploratory case study Int. J. Technol. Learn. 2016 23 4 9-25
[28]
OhmniLabs, I.: Ohmnilabs (2023). https://ohmnilabs.com/
[29]
Okundaye, O., et al.: Telepresence robotics for hands-on distance instruction. In: Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, pp. 1–11 (2020)
[30]
Rosenfield P, Lambert NM, and Black A Desk arrangement effects on pupil classroom behavior J. Educ. Psychol. 1985 77 1 101
[31]
Shores RE, Gunter PL, and Jack SL Classroom management strategies: are they setting events for coercion? Behav. Disord. 1993 18 2 92-102
[32]
Soares N, Kay JC, and Craven G Mobile robotic telepresence solutions for the education of hospitalized children Perspect. Health Inf. Manage. 2017 14 Fall 1e
[33]
Sommer R Classroom ecology J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 1967 3 4 489-503
[34]
Villanueva, A.M., et al.: RobotAR: an augmented reality compatible teleconsulting robotics toolkit for augmented makerspace experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2021)
[35]
Wernbacher, T., et al.: TRinE: telepresence robots in education (2022)
[36]
Wheldall K, Morris M, Vaughan P, and Ng YY Rows versus tables: an example of the use of behavioural ecology in two classes of eleven-year-old children Educ. Psychol. 1981 1 2 171-184

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Learning and Collaboration Technologies: 11th International Conference, LCT 2024, Held as Part of the 26th HCI International Conference, HCII 2024, Washington, DC, USA, June 29–July 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part I
Jun 2024
321 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-61671-6
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-61672-3
  • Editors:
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris,
  • Andri Ioannou

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 29 June 2024

Author Tags

  1. Embodied Pedagogy
  2. Instructional Proxemics
  3. Spatial Pedagogy
  4. Human-centered computing
  5. Human computer interaction (HCI)
  6. Interaction paradigms

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media