Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-031-42293-5_42guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

A Theoretical Framework for the Development of “Needy” Socially Assistive Robots

Published: 28 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We suggest a theoretical framework for the design and development of a “needy" socially assistive robot (SAR) for the elderly. Our hypothesis is that a needy SAR will be more readily accepted by those that require them and would result in overall more positive care outcomes when compared to a non needy alternative. This is supported by existing works which indicate traits that can be considered needy are viewed favourably when correctly integrated. We provide guidance on the key design considerations that should be made in order to implement these traits successfully into a SAR. Using this newly created framework we will subsequently proceed to evaluate the effectiveness of integrating a SAR with these traits in a real-world scenario.

References

[1]
Projected population by age (korea) (12 2021). http://www.kosis.kr
[2]
Japan population estimates report (2023). http://www.e-stat.go.jp
[3]
Abdi, J., et al.: Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 2, e018815 (2018)
[4]
Bartl, A., et al.: The influence of a social robot’s persona on how it is perceived and accepted by elderly users. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,pp. 681–691 (2016)
[5]
Bates, M.: Robotic pets: A senior’s best friend? IEEE Pulse 4, 17–20 (2019)
[6]
Bedaf, S., et al.: Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: what activities do they support and how far have they developed. Off. J. RESNA 2, 88–100 (4 2015)
[7]
Bemelmans, R., et al.: Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J. Am. Med. Directors Assoc. 2, 114–120 (2012)
[8]
Biswas, M., et al.: Are older people any different from younger people in the way they want to interact with robots? scenario based survey. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 1, 61–72 (2020)
[9]
Carros, F., et al.: Exploring human-robot interaction with the elderly: Results from a ten-week case study in a care home. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020)
[10]
Enders-Slegers, M.J., et al.: Pet ownership and human-animal interaction in an aging population: Rewards and challenges. Anthrozoös 2, 255–265 (3 2019)
[11]
Feil-Seifer, D., et al.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 465–468 (2005)
[12]
Hediger, K., et al.: Benefits of human-animal interactions for mental health and well-being. One Health: the theory and practice of integrated health approaches, pp. 344–355 (10 2020)
[13]
Heerink, M., et al.: The influence of a robot’s social abilities on acceptance by elderly users. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 521–526 (2006)
[14]
Heerink, M., et al.: Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In: HRI 2008–3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Living with Robots, pp. 113–119 (2008)
[15]
Heerink, M., et al.: Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users. In: People and Computers XXIII Celebrating People and Technology - Proceedings of HCI 2009, pp. 430–439 (2009)
[16]
Heerink, M., et al.: Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot (2009)
[17]
Hui Gan, G.Z., et al.: Pet ownership and its influence on mental health in older adults. Aging Mental Health 10, 1605–1612 (2019)
[18]
Iwasaki, Y., et al.: Interaction with the mercurial robot: Work assisting robot express the tiredness. In: ACM International Conf. Proceedings, pp. 29–33 (4 2019)
[19]
Joglekar, P., et al.: Humanoid robot as a companion for the senior citizens. In: 1st International Conference on Data Science and Analytics, PuneCon 2018 (2018)
[21]
Mulla, E., et al.: Frailty: An overview. InnovAiT: Education and inspiration for general practice 2, 71–79 (2 2020)
[22]
Ng, J., et al.: Older adults’ attitudes toward homes service robots. In: Proceedings - WASA 2012: Workshop at SIGGRAPH Asia 2012, pp. 87–90 (2012)
[23]
Obradović N, Lagueux É, et al. Pros and cons of pet ownership in sustaining independence in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review Ageing Soc. 2020 40 9 2061-2076
[24]
Oliveira, J., et al.: Speaking robots: The challenges of acceptance by the ageing society. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 1285–1290 (2017)
[25]
ONS: Overview of the uk population (2020). http://www.ons.gov.uk
[26]
Park, S., et al.: Should robots blush? Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021)
[27]
Sabelli, A.M., et al.: A conversational robot in an elderly care center: An ethnographic study. In: ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 37–44 (2011)
[28]
Salem, M., et al.: Would you trust a (faulty) robot?: Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In:ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 141–148 (3 2015)
[29]
Statista: Italy: population by age group (2019). http://www.statista.com
[30]
Takanokura, M., et al.: Implementation and user acceptance of social service robot for an elderly care program in a daycare facility. J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput. (2021)
[31]
Tkatch R et al. Reducing loneliness and improving well-being among older adults with animatronic pets Aging Ment. Health 2020 7 1239-1245
[32]
Tsiourti, C., et al.: Designing emotionally expressive robots: A comparative study on the perception of communication modalities. In: HAI 2017 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, pp. 213–222 (10 2017)

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023: 19th IFIP TC13 International Conference, York, UK, August 28 – September 1, 2023, Proceedings, Part IV
Aug 2023
728 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-42292-8
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-42293-5

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 28 August 2023

Author Tags

  1. Socially Assistive Robot
  2. Neediness
  3. Needy
  4. Framework
  5. Elderly
  6. Independent Living

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media