Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1007/978-3-030-85315-0_12guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

An Incentive Mechanism for Trading Personal Data in Data Markets

Published: 06 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

With the proliferation of the digital data economy, digital data is considered as the crude oil in the twenty-first century, and its value is increasing. Keeping pace with this trend, the model of data market trading between data providers and data consumers, is starting to emerge as a process to obtain high-quality personal information in exchange for some compensation. However, the risk of privacy violations caused by personal data analysis hinders data providers’ participation in the data market. Differential privacy, a de-facto standard for privacy protection, can solve this problem, but, on the other hand, it deteriorates the data utility. In this paper, we introduce a pricing mechanism that takes into account the trade-off between privacy and accuracy. We propose a method to induce the data provider to accurately report her privacy price and, we optimize it in order to maximize the data consumer’s profit within budget constraints. We show formally that the proposed mechanism achieves these properties, and also, validate them experimentally.

References

[3]
Dwork C and Roth A The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 2014 9 3–4 211-407
[4]
Bowen, C., Snoke, J.: Comparative study of differentially private synthetic data algorithms from the NIST PSCR differential privacy synthetic data challenge, pp. 1–32. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12704 (2019)
[5]
Volgushev, N., et al.: Conclave: secure multi-party computation on big data. In: Proceedings of the 14th EuroSys Conference, pp. 1–18 (2019)
[6]
Acar A et al. A survey on homomorphic encryption schemes: theory and implementation ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2018 51 4 1-35
[7]
Tang, J., et al.: Privacy loss in Apple’s implementation of differential privacy on macOS 10.12, pp. 1–12. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02753 (2017)
[8]
Lee J and Clifton C Lai X, Zhou J, and Li H How much is enough? Choosing ε for differential privacy Information Security 2011 Heidelberg Springer 325-340
[9]
Chen Y et al. Truthful mechanisms for agents that value privacy ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 2016 4 3 1-30
[10]
Ligett K and Roth A Goldberg PW Take it or leave it: running a survey when privacy comes at a cost Internet and Network Economics 2012 Heidelberg Springer 378-391
[11]
Xiao, D.: Is privacy compatible with truthfulness? In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 67–86 (2013)
[12]
Nissim, K., Orlandi, C., Smorodinsky, R.: Privacy-aware mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 774–789 (2012)
[13]
Hsu, J., et al.: Differential privacy: an economic method for choosing epsilon. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium, pp. 1–29 (2014)
[14]
Ghosh A and Roth A Selling privacy at auction Games Econ. Behav. 2015 91 1 334-346
[15]
Dandekar, P., Fawaz, N., Ioannidis, S.: Privacy auctions for recommender systems, pp. 1–23 (2012). https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.2885
[16]
Roth A Buying private data at auction: the sensitive surveyor’s problem ACM SIGecom Exch. 2012 11 1 1-8
[17]
Fleischer, L.K., Lyu, Y.H.: Approximately optimal auctions for selling privacy when costs are correlated with data. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 568–585 (2012)
[18]
Li W, Zhang C, Liu Z, and Tanaka Y Incentive mechanism design for crowdsourcing-based indoor localization IEEE Access 2018 6 54042-54051
[19]
Nget, R., Cao, Y., Yoshikawa, M.: How to balance privacy and money through pricing mechanism in personal data market, pp. 1–10. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02982 (2018)
[20]
Oh H et al. Personal data trading scheme for data brokers in IoT data marketplaces IEEE Access 2019 7 2019 40120-40132
[21]
Li C, Li DY, Miklau G, and Suciu D A theory of pricing private data ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2013 39 4 34-60
[22]
Aperjis, C., Huberman, B.A.: A market for unbiased private data: paying individuals according to their privacy attitudes, pp. 1–17 (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2046861
[23]
Jung, K., Park, S.: Privacy bargaining with fairness: privacy-price negotiation system for applying differential privacy in data market environments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data, pp. 1389–1394 (2019)
[24]
Krehbiel S Choosing epsilon for privacy as a service Proc. Priv. Enhanc. Technol. 2019 2019 192-205
[25]
Zhang, T., Zhu, Q.: On the differential private data market: endogenous evolution, dynamic pricing, and incentive compatibility, pp. 1–30. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04357 (2021)
[26]
Jorgensen, Z., Yu, T., Cormode, G.: Conservative or liberal? Personalized differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 31St International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 1023–1034. IEEE (2015)
[27]
Erlingsson, U., Pihur, V., Korolova, A.: Rappor randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1054–1067 (2014)
[28]
Cormode, G., et al.: Privacy at scale: local differential privacy in practice. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1655–1658 (2018)
[29]
Thông, T.N., Xiaokui, X., Yin, Y., et al.: Collecting and analyzing data from smart device users with local differential privacy, pp. 1–11. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05053 (2016)
[30]
Kasiviswanathan SP et al. What can we learn privately SIAM J. Comput. 2011 40 3 7903-8826
[31]
Biswas, S., Jung, K., Palamidessi, C.: An incentive mechanism for trading personal data in data markets, pp. 1–22. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14187 (2021)

Index Terms

  1. An Incentive Mechanism for Trading Personal Data in Data Markets
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Guide Proceedings
        Theoretical Aspects of Computing – ICTAC 2021: 18th International Colloquium, Virtual Event, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, September 8–10, 2021, Proceedings
        Sep 2021
        406 pages
        ISBN:978-3-030-85314-3
        DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-85315-0

        Publisher

        Springer-Verlag

        Berlin, Heidelberg

        Publication History

        Published: 06 September 2021

        Author Tags

        1. Data market
        2. Differential privacy
        3. Incentive mechanism
        4. Game theory

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 0
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
        Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        View options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media