Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Trust-Based IoT Cloud Participatory Sensing of Air Quality

Published: 01 April 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we present a case study of IoT cloud participatory sensing where a user sends a query to the cloud about the air quality of a location at a particular time to decide if it should enter the location based on its susceptibility to the air quality detected. All IoT devices (e.g., smart phones carried by humans or smart cars driven by humans) capable of detecting air quality can act as participants and submit sensing reports to the cloud for sensing result aggregation. The major challenge is the selection of trustworthy participants because not all IoT devices will be trustworthy. We leverage a "Trust as a Service" (TaaS) cloud utility to address the issue of selecting trustworthy participants. Using real traces of ozone (O3) levels and mobility traces of users in the O3 community of interest (O3COI) group in the city of Houston, we demonstrate that TaaS outperforms contemporary IoT trust protocols in selecting trustworthy participants. We compare the performance of the TaaS cloud utility with two contemporary IoT trust protocols for supporting trust-based IoT participatory sensing applications. With the help of the TaaS cloud utility, a user in this O3COI group is able to obtain O3 readings very close to the ground truth O3 level despite 30% participants are untrustworthy.

References

[1]
Khan, W. Z., Xiang, Y., Aalsalem, M. Y., & Arshad, Q. (2013). Mobile phone sensing systems: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials,15(1), 402---427.
[2]
Mousa, H., et al. (2015). Trust management and reputations systems in mobile participatory sensing applications: A survey. Computer Networks,90, 49---73.
[3]
Amintoosi, H., Kanhere, S. S., & Allahbakhsh, M. (2015). Trust-based privacy-aware participant selection in social participatory sensing. Journal of Information Security and Applications,20, 11---25.
[4]
Al-Hamadi, H., & Chen, I. R. (2017). Trust-based decision making for health IoT systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal,4(5), 1408---1419.
[5]
Chen, I. R., Guo, J., Wang, D. C., Tsai, J. J. P., Al-Hamadi, H., & You, I. (2018). Trust as a service for IoT service management in smart cities. The 16th IEEE International Conference on Smart City, Exeter, UK, June 2018.
[6]
Chen, I. R., Guo, J., & Bao, F. (2016). Trust management for SOA-based IoT and its application to service composition. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing,9(3), 482---495.
[7]
Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L. (2014). Trustworthiness management in the social internet of things. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Management,26(5), 1253---1266.
[8]
Pires B. et al. (2015). Towards an in silico experimental platform for air quality: Houston, TX as a case study. In Computational social science society of America conference, Santa Fe, NM, USA.
[9]
JØsang, A., & Ismail, R. (2002). The beta reputation system. Bled electronic commerce conference, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 1---14.
[10]
Guo, J., Chen, I. R., & Tsai. J. J. P. (2017). A mobile cloud hierarchical trust management protocol for IoT systems, In 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering, San Francisco, April 2017.
[11]
Chen, I. R., Gu, B., George, S. E., & Cheng, S. T. (2005). On failure recoverability of client-server applications in mobile wireless environments. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,54(1), 115---122.
[12]
Gu, B., & Chen, I. R. (2005). Performance analysis of location-aware mobile service proxies for reducing network cost in personal communication systems. Mobile Networks and Applications,10(4), 453---463.
[13]
Cheng, S. T., Chen, C. M., & Chen, I. R. (2000). Dynamic quota-based admission control with sub-rating in multimedia servers. Multimedia Systems,8(2), 83---91.
[14]
Cheng, S. T., Chen, C. M., & Chen, I. R. (2003). Performance evaluation of an admission control algorithm: Dynamic threshold with negotiations. Performance Evaluation,52(1), 1---13.
[15]
Yilmaz, O., & Chen, I. R. (2009). Utilizing call admission control for pricing optimization of multiple service classes in wireless cellular networks. Computer Communications,32(2), 317---323.
[16]
Chen, I. R., Chen, T. M., & Lee, C. (2001). Agent-based forwarding strategies for reducing location management cost in mobile networks. Mobile Networks and Applications,6(2), 105---115.
[17]
Chen, I. R., & Wang, D. C. (1996). Analysis of replicated data with repair dependency. The Computer Journal,39(9), 767---779.
[18]
Chen, I. R., Yilmaz, O., & Yen, I. L. (2006). Admission control algorithms for revenue optimization with QoS guarantees in mobile wireless networks. Wireless Personal Communications,38(3), 357---376.
[19]
Chen, I. R., & Bastani, F. B. (1991). Effect of artificial-intelligence planning procedures on system reliability. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,40(3), 364---369.
[20]
Chen, I. R., Guo, J., Bao, F., & Cho, J. H. (2014). Trust management in mobile Ad Hoc networks for bias minimization and application performance maximization. Ad Hoc Networks,19, 59---74.
[21]
Guo, J., Chen, I. R., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2017). A survey of trust computation models for service management in internet of things systems. Computer Communications,97, 1---14.
[22]
Saied, Y. B., Olivereau, A., Zeghlache, D., & Laurent, M. (2013). Trust management system design for the internet of things: A context-aware and multi-service approach. Computers and Security,39, 351---365.
[23]
Chen, I. R., Bao, F., & Guo, J. (2016). Trust-based service management for social internet of things systems. In IEEE transactions on dependable and secure computing, vol. 13, no. 6, Nov---Dec 2016, (pp. 684---696).
[24]
Nitti, M., Atzori, L., & Cvijikj, I. P. (2015). Friendship selection in the social internet of things: Challenges and possible strategies. IEEE Internet of Things Journal,2(3), 240---247.
[25]
Kamvar, S. D., Schlosser,M. T., & Garcia-Molina, H. The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. In 12th International conference on world wide web, Budapest, Hungary, 2003.
[26]
Xiong, L., & Liu, L. (2004). PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. In IEEE transaction on knowledge and data engineering 16, (pp. 843---857).
[27]
Su, Z., Liu, L., Li, M., Fan, X., Zhou, Y. ServiceTrust: Trust management in service provision networks. In IEEE international conference on services computing, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2013, pp. 272-279
[28]
Wang, Y., Chen, I. R., & Wang, D. C. (2015). A survey of mobile cloud computing applications: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Personal Communications,80, 1607---1623.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Quantitative Comparative Study of Data-oriented Trust Management Schemes in Internet of ThingsACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/347624813:3(1-30)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal
Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal  Volume 105, Issue 4
April 2019
451 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2019

Author Tags

  1. Cloud computing
  2. Internet of things
  3. Participatory sensing
  4. Trust

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A Quantitative Comparative Study of Data-oriented Trust Management Schemes in Internet of ThingsACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/347624813:3(1-30)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2022

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media