Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Hot topics in anaesthesia: a bibliometric analysis of five high-impact journals from 2010–2019

Published: 01 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Publication of research in anaesthesia is increasingly competitive. Understanding what topics of research are more likely to be published and where, is clearly valuable for authors seeking to optimise reach and impact of their work. This study aimed to identify the relative proportion of anaesthesia articles by topic for five anaesthesia journals over a 10-year period from 2010 to 2019, including any differences between journals and regions. We chose five anaesthesia journals based on current impact factor. All journal issues published between 2010–2019 were checked for total number of articles with only original research articles being further categorised by topic, country of research, funding status and citation count. Of 5782 original research articles analysed, the most frequent article topics published were translational studies (16%) and clinical practice (16%). Obstetric anaesthesia was the least frequent published (4%). Translational studies were the most frequently funded (84%) while articles on paediatric anaesthesia were least frequently funded (29%). The average number of citations per funded article was 37 versus 28 for non-funded articles. Translational studies were the most frequently published topic of research conducted in North America (25%) and Asia (25%), but of only average frequency in Europe (9%). Studies in obstetric and paediatric anaesthesia are less well-represented in anaesthesia literature and researchers may experience greater difficulty publishing these topics and obtaining funding accordingly. Authors should be aware of the diverse publishing tendencies of the different journals in anaesthesia in order to save time and effort when submitting research for publication.

References

[1]
Archambault È and Larivière V History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences Scientometrics 2009 79 3 635-649
[2]
Bruder N, Chew M, Forget P, et al. Our project for the Journal(s) European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2021 31 1 1-3
[3]
Chandrakantan A, Adler A, Stayer S, and Roth S National Institutes of Health-Funded Anesthesiology Research and Anesthesiology Physician-Scientists: Trends, Promises and Concerns Anesthesia and Analgesia 2019 129 6 1761-1766
[4]
Chen SY, Wei LF, and Ho CM Trend of academic publication activity in anesthesiology: A 2-decade bibliographic perspective Asian Journal of Anesthesiology 2017 55 1 3-8
[5]
Eisenach J Anesthesiology: Attracting the Best New Science in the Specialty Anesthesiology 2015 122 6 1198-1200
[6]
El-Boghdadly K, Docherty AB, and Klein AA Analysis of the distribution and scholarly output from National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia (NIAA) research grants Anaesthesia 2018 73 6 679-691
[7]
Fanelli D, Costas R, and Ioannidis J Meta-assessment of bias in science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2017 114 14 3714-3719
[8]
Feneck R, Natarajan N, Sebastian R, and Naughton C Decline in research publications from the United Kingdom in anaesthesia journals from 1997 to 2006 Anaesthesia 2008 63 3 270-275
[9]
Guan J and Chen J Translational research and its effects on medicine in China Chinese Medical Journal 2011 124 19 3170-3175
[10]
Harris M, Marti J, Watt H, Bhatti Y, Macinko J, and Darzi A Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians Health Affairs 2017 36 11 1997-2004
[11]
Hsieh J Author publication preferences and journal competition Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2016 68 2 365-377
[12]
Lacetera N and Zirulia L The economics of scientific misconduct Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 2011 27 3 568-603
[13]
Li D and Cornelis G Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study Accountability in Research 2021 28 2 63-94
[14]
Maher B and Anfres M Young scientists under pressure: What the data show Nature 2016 538 7626 444-445
[15]
Merton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
[16]
National Institutes of Health. (2020). FY 2019 RePORTER Project Data. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from https://exporter.nih.gov/ExPORTER_Catalog.aspx
[17]
Pagel P and Judetz J Scholarly Productivity and National Institutes of Health Funding of Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research Grant Recipients: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis Anesthesiology 2015 123 3 683-691
[18]
Ratnayake G, El-Boghdadly K, and Pandit J An analysis of the academic capacity of anaesthesia in the UK by publication trends and academic units Anaesthesia 2021 76 4 500-513
[19]
Reed D, Cook D, Beckman T, Levine R, Kern D, and Wright S Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research Journal of the American Medical Association 2007 298 9 1002-1009
[20]
SCImago. (2020). SCImago Journal and Country Rank, 2020. SCImago. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=2703
[21]
Surkis A The relative citation ratio: What is it and why should medical librarians care? Journal of the Medical Library Association 2018 106 4 508-513
[22]
Thomson Reuters. (2012). Global publishing: Changes in submission trends and the impact on scholarly publishers. Thomson Reuters. Retrieve July 15, 2021, from http://scholarone.com/media/pdf/GlobalPublishing_WP.pdf
[23]
Wang, X., Wang, E., Marincola, F. (2011). Translational Medicine is developing in China: A new venue for collaboration. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9(3).
[24]
World Bank. (2020). World Bank Country and Lending Groups, 2020. World Bank. Retrieved March 1, 2021, from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Scientometrics
Scientometrics  Volume 126, Issue 10
Oct 2021
524 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2021
Accepted: 05 August 2021
Received: 24 May 2021

Author Tags

  1. Anaesthesia
  2. Journals
  3. Publication
  4. Funding
  5. Bibliometrics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media