Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

The structural power of reconfigurable circuits in the amoebot model

Published: 13 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The amoebot model (Derakhshandeh et al. in: SPAA ACM, pp 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612669.2612712, 2014) has been proposed as a model for programmable matter consisting of tiny, robotic elements called amoebots. We consider the reconfigurable circuit extension (Feldmann et al. in J Comput Biol 29(4):317–343. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2021.0363, 2022) of the geometric amoebot model that allows the amoebot structure to interconnect amoebots by so-called circuits. A circuit permits the instantaneous transmission of signals between the connected amoebots. In this paper, we examine the structural power of the reconfigurable circuits. We start with fundamental problems like the stripe computation problem where, given any connected amoebot structure S, an amoebot u in S, and some axis X, all amoebots belonging to axis X through u have to be identified. Second, we consider the global maximum problem, which identifies an amoebot at the highest possible position with respect to some direction in some given amoebot (sub)structure. A solution to this problem can be used to solve the skeleton problem, where a cycle of amoebots has to be found in the given amoebot structure which contains all boundary amoebots. A canonical solution to that problem can be used to come up with a canonical path, which provides a unique characterization of the shape of the given amoebot structure. Constructing canonical paths for different directions allows the amoebots to set up a spanning tree and to check symmetry properties of the given amoebot structure. The problems are important for a number of applications like rapid shape transformation, energy dissemination, and structural monitoring. Interestingly, the reconfigurable circuit extension allows polylogarithmic-time solutions to all of these problems.

References

[1]
Alumbaugh JC, Daymude JJ, Demaine ED, et al (2019) Simulation of programmable matter systems using active tile-based self-assembly. In: DNA, lecture notes in computer science, vol 11648. Springer, pp 140–158.
[2]
Arroyo MA, Cannon S, Daymude JJ, et al. A stochastic approach to shortcut bridging in programmable matter Nat Comput 2018 17 4 723-741
[3]
Cannon S, Daymude JJ, Randall D, et al (2016) A markov chain algorithm for compression in self-organizing particle systems. In: PODC. ACM, pp 279–288
[4]
Daymude JJ, Hinnenthal K, Richa AW, et al (2019) Computing by programmable particles. In: Distributed computing by mobile entities, lecture notes in computer science, vol 11340. Springer, pp 615–681,
[5]
Daymude JJ, Gmyr R, Hinnenthal K, et al (2020) Convex hull formation for programmable matter. In: ICDCN. ACM, pp 2:1–2:10,
[6]
Daymude JJ, Richa AW, Weber JW (2021) Bio-inspired energy distribution for programmable matter. In: ICDCN. ACM, pp 86–95.
[7]
Daymude JJ, Richa AW, and Scheideler C The canonical amoebot model: algorithms and concurrency control Distributed Comput 2023 36 2 159-192
[8]
Derakhshandeh Z, Dolev S, Gmyr R, et al (2014) Brief announcement: amoebot - a new model for programmable matter. In: SPAA. ACM, pp 220–222,
[9]
Derakhshandeh Z, Gmyr R, Strothmann T, et al (2015) Leader election and shape formation with self-organizing programmable matter. In: DNA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9211. Springer, pp 117–132,
[10]
Derakhshandeh Z, Gmyr R, Richa AW, et al (2016) Universal shape formation for programmable matter. In: SPAA. ACM, pp 289–299.
[11]
Derakhshandeh Z, Gmyr R, Richa AW, et al. Universal coating for programmable matter Theor Comput Sci 2017 671 56-68
[12]
Feldmann M, Padalkin A, Scheideler C, et al. Coordinating amoebots via reconfigurable circuits J Comput Biol 2022 29 4 317-343
[13]
Luna GAD, Flocchini P, Santoro N, et al. Shape formation by programmable particles Distributed Comput 2020 33 1 69-101
[14]
Padilla JE, Sha R, Kristiansen M, et al. A signal-passing dna-strand-exchange mechanism for active self-assembly of dna nanostructures Angew Chem Int Ed 2015 54 20 5939-5942
[15]
Pandurangan G, Robinson P, Scquizzato M (2018) The distributed minimum spanning tree problem. Bull EATCS 125
[16]
Scalise D and Schulman R Controlling matter at the molecular scale with dna circuits Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2019 21 1 469-493
[17]
Shah S, Wee J, Song T, et al. Using strand displacing polymerase to program chemical reaction networks J Am Chem Soc 2020 142 21 9587-9593
[18]
Song T, Eshra A, Shah S, et al. Fast and compact dna logic circuits based on single-stranded gates using strand-displacing polymerase Nat Nanotechnol 2019 14 11 1075-1081
[19]
Toffoli T and Margolus N Programmable matter: Concepts and realization Int J High Speed Comput 1993 5 2 155-170

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Natural Computing: an international journal
Natural Computing: an international journal  Volume 23, Issue 4
Dec 2024
113 pages

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2024
Accepted: 29 February 2024

Author Tags

  1. Progammable matter
  2. Amoebot model
  3. Reconfigurable circuits
  4. Spanning tree
  5. Symmetry detection

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media