Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Productive Interrelationships between Collaborative Groups Ease the Challenges of Dynamic and Multi-Teaming

Published: 01 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Work organization and team membership is highly complex for modern workers. Teams are often dynamic as personnel change during a project. Dynamic team members have to be actively recruited and personnel changes make it harder for participants to retain group focus. Workers are often members of multiple groups. Though prior work has identified the prevalence of multi-teaming and dynamic teams, it has been unable to explain how workers cope with the challenges the new style of work should cause. This paper systematically characterizes the modern organizational landscape from an individual perspective, by studying how people typically organize work across their multiple collaborative groups. A unique contribution of our work is to examine the interrelationships between the collaborative groups individuals typically participate in. We introduce the notion of a collaboration profile to characterize these interrelations. We expected workers to be overburdened by contributing to multiple teams often with shifting personnel. However, we found that multi-teaming involves productive interrelationships between collaborative groups that ease some of the documented challenges of dynamic teams, such as goal setting, recruiting, and group maintenance. We define a typology that describes the various types of collaborative groups workers participate in, and provide examples of productive interrelations between collaborations. In characterizing interrelations between collaborations, we provide detailed examples of how people exploit resources across their different collaborations to address the problems of working in multiple dynamic teams.

References

[1]
Ackerman, M. and McDonald, D. (1998). Just talk to me: A field study of expertise location. Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 315-324.
[2]
Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15, 279-306.
[3]
DeChurch, L. A., & Marks, M. A. (2006). Leadership in multi-team systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311-329.
[4]
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9-41.
[5]
González, V. M. and Mark, G. (2004). "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres. Proceedings of CHI. New York: ACM Press, pp. 113-120.
[6]
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
[7]
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[8]
Katz, R., & Tushman, M. (1979). Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 23, 139-162.
[9]
Kc, D., & Terwiesch, C. (2009). Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Science, 55, 1486-1498.
[10]
Kittur, A. and Kraut, R. E. (2008). Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: Quality through coordination. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, pp. 37-46.
[11]
Kraut, R. E. (2003). Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks (pp. 325-356). New York: Morgan Kaufman.
[12]
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Mahmud, J. Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., and Lau, T. (2011). Topika: Integrating collaborative sharing with email. Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 3161-3164.
[14]
Matthews, T., Whittaker, S., Moran, T., and Yuen, S. (2011). Collaboration Personas: A new approach to designing workplace collaboration tools. Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 2247-2256.
[15]
Mark, G., & Poltrock, S. (2004). Groupware adoption in a distributed organization: Transporting and transforming technology through social worlds. Information and Organization, 14, 297-327.
[16]
Marks, M. A., DeChurch, L. A., Mathieu, J. E., Panzer, F. J., & Alonso, A. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964-971.
[17]
McDonald, D., and Ackerman, M. (2000). Expertise recommender: A flexible recommendation system and architecture. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2000), Philadelphia, PA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 231-240.
[18]
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[19]
Moon, J., & Sproull, L. (2002). Essence of distributed work: The case of the Linux kernel. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), distributed work (pp. 381-404). Cambridge: MIT Press.
[20]
Moon, M. A., & Armstrong, G. M. (1994). Selling teams: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14(1), 17-41.
[21]
Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. (2002). Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 283-308). Cambridge: MIT Press.
[22]
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., and Schwarz, H. 2002. Networkers and their Activity in Intensional Networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 11, nos. 1-2, pp. 205-242.
[23]
O'Leary, M., Mortensen, M., and Woolley, A. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals, teams, and organizations, Academy of Management Review. To appear.
[24]
Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., and Terveen, L. (2009). Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on supporting group work (GROUP '09). New York: ACM Press, pp. 51-60.
[25]
Preece, J., and Maloney-Krichmar, D. (2005). Online communities: Design, theory, and practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 10, no. 4, article 1.
[26]
Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody. London: Penguin.
[27]
Yarosh, S., Matthews, T., Moran, T., and Smith, B. (2009) What is an activity? Appropriating an activity-centric system. Proceedings of INTERACT, pp. 582-595.
[28]
Zhang, J., Ackerman, M. and Adamic, L. (2007). Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '07). New York: ACM Press, pp. 221-230.
[29]
Zika-Viktorsson, A., Sundström, P., & Engwall, M. (2006). Project overload: an exploratory study of work and management in multi-project settings. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (5), 385-394.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Multiple Team Membership in Software Development Gig WorkProceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference10.1145/3322385.3322424(180-182)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Perspective-Rethinking TeamsOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2017.119829:2(341-355)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • (2016)Theory Driven Community Analytics and Influence on Community SuccessProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion10.1145/2818052.2874355(135-138)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
  • Show More Cited By
  1. Productive Interrelationships between Collaborative Groups Ease the Challenges of Dynamic and Multi-Teaming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    Computer Supported Cooperative Work  Volume 21, Issue 4-5
    October 2012
    115 pages

    Publisher

    Kluwer Academic Publishers

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 October 2012

    Author Tags

    1. collaboration types
    2. collaborative work
    3. interrelations
    4. multi-teaming
    5. office
    6. teams
    7. workplace

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Multiple Team Membership in Software Development Gig WorkProceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference10.1145/3322385.3322424(180-182)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
    • (2018)Perspective-Rethinking TeamsOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2017.119829:2(341-355)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
    • (2016)Theory Driven Community Analytics and Influence on Community SuccessProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion10.1145/2818052.2874355(135-138)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
    • (2016)When Distance Doesn't Really MatterProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2818048.2835237(335-345)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
    • (2014)Constructing the TeamOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2013.088125:3(909-931)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2014
    • (2014)Beyond end user content to collaborative knowledge mappingProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing10.1145/2531602.2531694(900-910)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2014
    • (2013)Emphasizing dysfunctional group dynamics in collaboration personasCHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2468356.2468379(121-126)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2013
    • (2013)Closure vs. structural holesProceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work10.1145/2441776.2441781(5-18)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2013
    • (2012)Group dynamics findings from coordination in problem solving and decision making meetingsProceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/2389176.2389232(305-306)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2012
    • (2012)Diversity among enterprise online communitiesProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2207676.2208685(2815-2824)Online publication date: 5-May-2012
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media