Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter

Published: 01 March 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Irony is a pervasive aspect of many online texts, one made all the more difficult by the absence of face-to-face contact and vocal intonation. As our media increasingly become more social , the problem of irony detection will become even more pressing. We describe here a set of textual features for recognizing irony at a linguistic level, especially in short texts created via social media such as Twitter postings or "tweets". Our experiments concern four freely available data sets that were retrieved from Twitter using content words (e.g. "Toyota") and user-generated tags (e.g. "#irony"). We construct a new model of irony detection that is assessed along two dimensions: representativeness and relevance. Initial results are largely positive, and provide valuable insights into the figurative issues facing tasks such as sentiment analysis, assessment of online reputations, or decision making.

References

[1]
Artstein, R., & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34 (4), 555-596.
[2]
Attardo, S. (2007). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 135-174). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[3]
Balog, K., Mishne, G., & Rijke, M. (2006). Why are they excited? Identifying and explaining spikes in blog mood levels. In: European chapter of the association of computational linguistics (EACL 2006).
[4]
Burfoot, C., & Baldwin, T. (2009). Automatic satire detection: Are you having a laugh? In: ACL-IJCNLP '09: Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 conference short papers (pp. 161-164).
[5]
Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L., Silva, M., & de Oliveira, E. (2009). Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: Oh...!! it's "so easy" ;-). In:
[6]
Chin-Yew, L., & Och, F. (2004). Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using longest common subsequence and skip-bigram statistics. In: ACL '04: Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (p. 605). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[7]
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113 (1), 121-126.
[8]
Cohen, W., Ravikumar, P., & Fienberg, S. (2003). A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-03 workshop on information integration (pp. 73-78).
[9]
Colston, H. (2007). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 97-134). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[10]
Curcó, C. (2007). Irony: Negation, echo, and metarepresentation. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 269-296). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[11]
Davidov, D., Tsur, O., & Rappoport, A. (2010). Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in Twitter and Amazon. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics (COLING) .
[12]
Gibbs, R. (2007). Irony in talk among friends. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 339-360). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[13]
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19 (2), 239-264.
[14]
Grice, H. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
[15]
Guthrie, D., Allison, B., Liu, W., Guthrie, L., & Wilks, Y. (2006). A closer look at skip-gram modelling. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC- 2006) (pp. 1222-1225).
[16]
Kreuz, R. (2001) Using figurative language to increase advertising effectiveness. In: Office of naval research military personnel research science workshop . Memphis, TN.
[17]
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (2007). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 57-96). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[18]
Lucariello, J. (2007) Situational irony: A concept of events gone away. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 467-498). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[19]
Mihalcea, R., & Strapparava, C. (2006a). Learning to laugh (automatically): Computational models for humor recognition. Journal of Computational Intelligence, 22 (2), 126-142.
[20]
Mihalcea, R., & Strapparava, C. (2006b). Technologies that make you smile: Adding humour to text-based applications. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21 (5), 33-39.
[21]
Miller, G. (1995). Wordnet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38 (11), 39-41.
[22]
Monge, A., & Elkan, C. (1996). The field matching problem: Algorithms and applications. In: In Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 267-270).
[23]
Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 79-86). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[24]
Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. (2004). Wordnet::Similarity--Measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Proceedings of the 9th national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-04) (pp. 1024-1025). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[25]
Reyes, A., & Rosso, P. (2011). Mining subjective knowledge from customer reviews: A specific case of irony detection. In: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational approaches to subjectivity and sentiment analysis (WASSA 2.011) (pp. 118-124). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[26]
Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Buscaldi, D. (2009). Humor in the blogosphere: First clues for a verbal humor taxonomy. Journal of Intelligent Systems 18(4), 311-331.
[27]
Saif, M., Cody, D., & Bonnie, D. (2009). Generating high-coverage semantic orientation lexicons from overtly marked words and a thesaurus. In: Proceedings of the 2009 conference on EMNLP (pp. 599-608). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[28]
Sarmento, L., Carvalho, P., Silva, M., & de Oliveira, E. (2009). Automatic creation of a reference corpus for political opinion mining in user-generated content. In: TSA '09: Proceedings of the 1st international CIKM workshop on topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion (pp. 29-36). ACM: Hong Kong, China.
[29]
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87 , 53-76.
[30]
Tsur, O., Davidov, D., & Rappoport, A. (2010). {ICWSM}--A great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In W. W. Cohen & S. Gosling (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 162-169). Washington, D.C.: The AAAI Press.
[31]
Utsumi, A. (1996). A unified theory of irony and its computational formalization. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on computational linguistics (pp. 962-967). Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[32]
Veale, T., & Hao, Y. (2009). Support structures for linguistic creativity: A computational analysis of creative irony in similes. In: Proceedings of CogSci 2009, the 31st annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1376-1381).
[33]
Veale, T., & Hao, Y. (2010). Detecting ironic intent in creative comparisons. In: Proceedings of 19th European conference on artificial intelligence--ECAI 2010 (pp. 765-770). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
[34]
Whissell, C. (2009). Using the revised dictionary of affect in language to quantify the emotional undertones of samples of natural language. Psychological Reports, 105 (2), 509-521.
[35]
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2007). On verbal irony. In R. Gibbs & H. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought (pp. 35-56). London: Taylor and Francis Group.
[36]
Witten, I., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining. Practical machine learning tools and techniques . Los Altos, CA, Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An attention-based, context-aware multimodal fusion method for sarcasm detection using inter-modality inconsistencyKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111457287:COnline publication date: 5-Mar-2024
  • (2024)The limitations of irony detection in Dutch social mediaLanguage Resources and Evaluation10.1007/s10579-023-09656-158:4(1355-1386)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)An exploratory and automated study of sarcasm detection and classification in app stores using fine-tuned deep learning classifiersAutomated Software Engineering10.1007/s10515-024-00468-331:2Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Language Resources and Evaluation
Language Resources and Evaluation  Volume 47, Issue 1
March 2013
263 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 March 2013

Author Tags

  1. Figurative language processing
  2. Irony detection
  3. Negation
  4. Web text analysis

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An attention-based, context-aware multimodal fusion method for sarcasm detection using inter-modality inconsistencyKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111457287:COnline publication date: 5-Mar-2024
  • (2024)The limitations of irony detection in Dutch social mediaLanguage Resources and Evaluation10.1007/s10579-023-09656-158:4(1355-1386)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)An exploratory and automated study of sarcasm detection and classification in app stores using fine-tuned deep learning classifiersAutomated Software Engineering10.1007/s10515-024-00468-331:2Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
  • (2022)Non-literal Communication in Chinese Internet Spaces: A Case Study of FishingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129516:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Unparalleled sarcasm: a framework of parallel deep LSTMs with cross activation functions towards detection and generation of sarcastic statementsLanguage Resources and Evaluation10.1007/s10579-022-09622-357:2(765-802)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Irony Recognition in Chinese Text Based on Linguistic Features and Attention MechanismChinese Lexical Semantics10.1007/978-3-031-28956-9_28(351-363)Online publication date: 14-May-2022
  • (2021)Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Sarcasm Detection in DialoguesWireless Communications & Mobile Computing10.1155/2021/29393342021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Over a decade of social opinion mining: a systematic reviewArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-021-10030-254:7(4873-4965)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Isn’t It Ironic, Don’t You Think?Neural Information Processing10.1007/978-3-030-92273-3_43(526-536)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2021
  • (2021)On the Generalization of Figurative Language Detection: The Case of Irony and SarcasmNatural Language Processing and Information Systems10.1007/978-3-030-80599-9_16(178-186)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media