Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Managing healthcare costs by peer-group modeling

Published: 01 December 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We describe statistical methods for managing healthcare costs using peer-group models and outlier detection. A peer group is a collection of similar entities such as patients, physicians, clinics, hospitals or pharmacies. In an empirical study of drug volumes prescribed by physicians, we examined the billing and prescription records for all patients covered by a major insurer over a 6 month period, encompassing over twenty million individual patient-physician encounters. During this period, 21,243 physicians prescribed a major pain-control medication which is frequently the subject of abuse - oxycodone. Profiles were computed for each physician based on their specialty and the clinical characteristics of their patients. For each physician, the average prescription volume within the corresponding peer group of similar physicians is an estimate of the expected volume of prescriptions for that physician. Strategies were developed to select outliers from the expected values as the ones that are candidates for potential cost reduction. Overall, the prediction of actual outcomes from peer profiles is significantly better than chance, with a reduction of average error of 45.5 %. For the 10 % of physicians that prescribed the most medications, there were extreme and highly significant differences found between their expected and predicted outcomes.

References

[1]
Aggarwal C (2013) Outlier analysis. Springer, New York
[2]
Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ 95:1082---1095
[3]
Bolton RJ, Hand DJ et al (2001) Unsupervised profiling methods for fraud detection. In: Proc. credit scoring and credit control VII. Citeseer
[4]
Carlson J, Sullivan S, Garrison L, Neumann P, Veenstra D (2010) Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy 96:179---190
[5]
Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2009) Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 41 (3):15:1---15:58
[6]
Leap T (2011) Phantom billing, fake prescriptions, and the high cost of medicine. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
[7]
Li J, Huang K, Jin J, Shi J (2008) A survey on statistical methods for health care fraud detection. Health Care Manag Sci 11:275---287
[8]
Phua C, Lee V, Smith K, Gayler R (2010) A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research. arXiv preprint arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.6119
[9]
Porter M (2009) A strategy for health care reform toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 361:109---112
[10]
Porter M, Teisberg E (2006) Redefining healthcare creating value based competition on results. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge
[11]
Schultz P, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429---434
[12]
Sparrow M (2008) Fraud in the us health-care system: exposing the vulnerabilities of automated payments systems. Soc Res: An International Quarterly 75:1151---1180
[13]
United States G. A. O. (2000) HealthCare fraud schemes to defraud, Medicare, Medicaid and Private Health Insurers. GAO/T-OSI-00-15, Washington, DC
[14]
van Walraven C, Naylor C (1998) Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. JAMA 280(6):550---558
[15]
Weiss S, Indurkhya N (1998) Predictive data mining: a practical guide. Morgan Kaufmann. http://www.data-miner.com
[16]
Weston DJ, Hand DJ, Adams NM, Whitrow C, Juszczak P (2008) Plastic card fraud detection using peer group analysis. Adv Data Anal Classif 2(1):45---62
[17]
World-Health-Organization (2014) International classification of diseases. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Developing an anomaly detection framework for Medicare claimsProceedings of the 2023 Australasian Computer Science Week10.1145/3579375.3579410(234-237)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
  • (2018)Identifying Medicare Provider Fraud with Unsupervised Machine Learning2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI)10.1109/IRI.2018.00051(285-292)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2018
  1. Managing healthcare costs by peer-group modeling

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Applied Intelligence
      Applied Intelligence  Volume 43, Issue 4
      December 2015
      217 pages

      Publisher

      Kluwer Academic Publishers

      United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 December 2015

      Author Tags

      1. Healthcare
      2. Machine learning
      3. Nearest neighbor
      4. Peer profiles
      5. Prediction

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Developing an anomaly detection framework for Medicare claimsProceedings of the 2023 Australasian Computer Science Week10.1145/3579375.3579410(234-237)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
      • (2018)Identifying Medicare Provider Fraud with Unsupervised Machine Learning2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI)10.1109/IRI.2018.00051(285-292)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2018

      View Options

      View options

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media