Cited By
View all- Dvořák WRapberger AWoltran S(2023)A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semanticsArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011324:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
Pages 2255 - 2270
Abstract
We explore systematic connections between weighted (semi-abstract) argumentation frames and t-norm-based fuzzy logics. To this aim we introduce the concept of argumentative immunity, as well as corresponding notions of argumentative soundness and completeness with respect to given sets of logical attack principles. For G del logic, a detailed proof of argumentative soundness and completeness with respect to appropriate principles is presented. For ukasiewicz and product logic this is indicated more briefly, but with some hints on corresponding interpretations of the attack relation between (claims of) arguments. Moreover, the central axiom of prelinearity is analyzed from our argumentation-based perspective.
Index Terms
- Connecting fuzzy logic and argumentation frames via logical attack principles
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
We present two dialectic procedures for the sceptical ideal semantics for argumentation. The first procedure is defined in terms of dispute trees, for abstract argumentation frameworks. The second procedure is defined in dialectical terms, for ...
Prioritised Default Logic as Rational Argumentation
AAMAS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent SystemsWe endow Brewka's prioritised default logic (PDL) with argumentation semantics using the ASPIC+M framework for structured argumentation. We prove that the conclusions of the justified arguments correspond to the prioritised default extensions in a ...
Base Argumentation as an Abstraction of Deductive Argumentation
Logic and ArgumentationAbstractBase argumentation is a logic-based instantiation of abstract argumentation. Each base argument is a subset of the given knowledge base. In this paper, we show that base argumentation satisfies some rationality postulates, and that base ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © Copyright © 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Berlin, Heidelberg
Publication History
Published: 01 April 2019
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Dvořák WRapberger AWoltran S(2023)A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semanticsArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2023.104011324:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2023
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in