Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Unabhängigkeit der bewertung zweier musterparameter von deren unterschiedlichkeitsgrad bei der Dressur

Published: 01 March 1983 Publication History

Abstract

Bees were trained on a black disc (rewarded) against a smaller grey disc (unrewarded). Thus the bees had the choice of distinguishing between the two training figures by relying on the difference in size or on the difference in greyness or on both parameters. The aim of the present investigation was whether the relative weight of these parameters depended upon the differences in size and greyness presented during the training phase. 1. During the first two days of training the relative rating of these parameters changed in some, though not all individuals. In these cases the size of the discs rose in importance while the greyness was rated uniformly high (Fig. 3). Later, from the third day of training onwards the parameters were rated constantly. 2. Whenever size and greyness of the two training figures differed noticeably the bee relied on both parameters. The bee rated both parameters independently of the quantity of the differences in size and greyness presented during the training (Fig. 5). Thus the bee's analysis of the tested patterns cannot be attributed solely to the training paradigm, but seems to rely also on given (innate) "analyzers" (cf. Sutherland and Mackintosh, 1971). The type of training patterns only determines which "analyzers" influence the choice reaction. 3. The bee's "analyzer for size" had an influence on the choice reaction only if there was a noticeable size-difference between the training figures. The "analyzer for shades of grey", however, strongly influenced the choice reactions also in those cases where the training figures showed no difference in greyness but only differences in size (Fig. 2).

References

[1]
Cruse, H.: An application of the cross-correlation coefficient to pattern recognition of honey bees. Kybernetik 15, 73-84 (1974).
[2]
Daumer, K.: Reizmetrische Untersuchungeu des Farbensehens der Biene. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 38, 413-486 (1956).
[3]
Frisch, K. v.: Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zool. Jb. Allg. Zool. Physiol. 35, 1-182 (1915).
[4]
Frisch, K. v.: Über den Geruchssinn der Bienen und seine blüten-biologische Bedeutung. Zool. Jb. (Physiol.) 37, 1-238 (1919).
[5]
Hassenstein, B.: Bedingungen für Lernprozesse - teleonomisch gesehen. In: Informatik, Scharf, J.H. (Hrsg.). Leipzig: Joh. Abr. Barth-Verlag 1972.
[6]
Hassenstein, B.: Instinkt, Lernen, Spielen, Einsicht: Einführung in die Verhaltensbiologie. München: Piper 1980.
[7]
Helversen, O. v.: Zur spektralen Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit der Honigbiene. J. Comp. Physiol. 80, 439-472 (1972).
[8]
Helversen, O. v.: The relationship between difference in stimuli and choice frequency in training experiments with the honey bee. In: Information processing in the visual system of arthropods, Wehner, R. (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972.
[9]
Hertz, M.: Über figurale Intensitäten und Qualitäten in der optischen Wahrnehmung der Biene. Biol. Zbl. 53, 10-40 (1933).
[10]
Koltermann, R.: Rassen-bzw. artspezifische Duftbewertung bei der Honigbiene und ökologische Adaptation. J. Comp. Physiol. 85, 327-360 (1973).
[11]
Kriston, I.: Zum Problem des Lernverhaltens von Apis mellifica L. gegenüber verschiedenen Duftstoffen. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 74, 169-189 (1971).
[12]
Kriston, I.: Die Bewertung von Duft- und Farbsignalen als Orientie-rungshilfen an der Futterquelle dutch Apis mellifera L. J. Comp. Physiol. 84, 77-94 (1973).
[13]
Lindauer, M.: Lernen und Gedächtnis - Versuche an der Honigbie-ne. Naturwissenschaften 57, 463-467 (1970).
[14]
Mackintosh, N.J.: The psychology of animal learning. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press 1974.
[15]
Menzel, R.: Untersuchungen zum Eflernen von Spektralfarben durch die Honigbiene. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 56, 22-62 (1967).
[16]
Micko, H.C., Fischer, W.: The metric of multidimensional psychological space as a function of differential attention to subjective attributes. J. Math. Psychol. 7, 118-143 (1970).
[17]
Ronacher, B.: Äquivalenz zwischen Größen- und Helligkeitsunter-schieden im Rahmen der visuelten Wahrnehmung der Honigbie-he. Biol. Cybern. 32, 63-75 (1979).
[18]
Ronacher, B.: Beitrag einzelner Parameter zum wahrnehmungsge-mäßen Unterschied von zusammengesetzten Reizen bei der Honigbiene. Biol. Cybern. 32, 77-83 (1979).
[19]
Ronacher, B.: Ein einfacher Zusammenhang zwischen der Äquiva-lenzbeziehung und der Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit für zwei Musterparameter bei der Honigbiene. Biol. Cybern. 36, 51-61 (1980).
[20]
Saraga, E., Shallice, T.: Parallel processing of the attributes of single stimuli. Percept Psychophys. 13, 261-270 (1973).
[21]
Schnetter, B.: Visuelle Formunterscheidung der Honigbiene im Bereich von Vier- und Sechsstrahlsternen. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 59, 90-109 (1968).
[22]
Schnetter, B.: Experiments on pattern discrimination in honey bees. In: Information processing in the visual system of arthropods, Wehner, R. (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1972.
[23]
Schnetter, B.: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum Lernverhalten der Bienen und Hummeln unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Blütenstetigkeit. Habilitationsschrift, Würzburg 1979.
[24]
Sutherland, N.S., Mackintosh, N.J.: Mechanisms of Animal Discrimination learning. New York, London: Academic Press 1971.
[25]
Tversky, A., Krantz, D.H.: The dimensional representation and the metric structure of similarity data. J. Math. Psychol. 7, 572-596 (1970).
[26]
Wagner, A.R.: Incidental stimuli and discrimination learning. In: Animal discrimination learning, Gilbert, R.M., Sutherland, N.S. (eds.). New York, London: Academic Press 1969.
[27]
Wagner, A.R.: Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In: Animal discrimination learning, Gilbert, R.M., Sutherland, N.S. (eds.). New York, London: Academic Press 1969.
[28]
Wehner, R.: Die Bedeutung der Streifenbreite für die optische Winkelmessung der Biene. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 58, 322-343 (1968).
[29]
Wehner, R.: The generalization of directional visual stimuli in the honey bee, Apis meUifera. J. Insect Physiol. 17, 1579-1591 (1971).
[30]
Wehner, R.: Pattern recognition. In: compound eye and vision of insects, Horridge, G.A. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975.
[31]
Wehner, R., Lindauer, M.: Zur Physiologie des Formensehens bei der Honigbiene. I. Winkelunterscheidung an vertikal orientierten Streifenmustern. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 52, 290-324 (1966).

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Biological Cybernetics
Biological Cybernetics  Volume 46, Issue 3
March 1983
66 pages

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 01 March 1983

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media