research-article

Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities

Authors:

HELEN PAINAuthors Info & Claims

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 50, Issue 2

Pages 109 - 144

https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1998.0238

Published: 01 February 1999 Publication History

Abstract

There are many people who find the standard computer input devices the keyboard and mouse difficult to use due to a motor disability. A number of keyboard and mouse configuration options designed to overcome physical difficulties exist. However, formal empirical evaluation of such facilities is rare. There is, in fact, little data available on the precise nature of physical difficulties with input devices. Hence, it is difficult to gauge the adequacy of existing access provision. This paper presents an empirical study of the keyboard and mouse errors encountered in a sample of 20 computer users with motor disabilities, and six without disabilities. Six important classes of keyboard difficulty are identified, involving significant correction time for participants with disabilities. Difficulties with all aspects of mouse usage were observed, particularly pointing and dragging. Many of the difficulties observed would be amenable to automatic detection. It is hoped that these results will help to inform the development of more accessible software and hardware.

References

[1]

AUGUST, S. & WEISS, P. (1992). A human-factors approach to adapted access device prescription and customization. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development , 29 , 64-77.

[2]

BEWLEY, W., ROBERTS, T., SCHROIT, D. & VERPLANK, W. (1990). Human factors testing in the design of Xerox's 8010 'Star' office workstation. In J. PREECE & L. KELLER, Eds. Human-Computer Interaction: Selected Readings . Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.

[3]

BROADBENT, S. & CURRAN, S. (1992). The Assessment , Disability and Technology Handbook . Oldham: North West Regional ACCESS Centre and Oldham Education Department.

[4]

BROWN, C. (1992). Assistive technology computers and people with disabilities. Communications of the ACM , 35 , 36-45.

Digital Library

[5]

BROWNLOW, N., SHEIN, F., THOMAS, D., MILNER, M. & PARNES, P. (1989). Direct manipulation: Problems with pointing devices. In Resna'89: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference , pp. 246-247. Washington DC: Resna Press.

[6]

CARD, S., MORAN, T. & NEWELL, A. (1987). The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. In R. M. BAECKER & W. A. S. BUXTON, Eds. Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach , Chapter 5, pp. 192-206. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

[7]

CASALI, S. (1995). A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method. In A. D. N. EDWARDS, Ed. Extra - Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction : Interfaces for Users with Disabilities , Chapter 17, pp. 315-341. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8]

DAMERAU, F. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM , 7 , 171-176.

Digital Library

[9]

EDWARDS, A. D. N. (1995). Extra - Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction : Interfaces for Users with Disabilities . Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[10]

EGAN, D. E. (1988). Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In M. HELANDER, Ed. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , Chapter 24, pp. 543-580. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

[11]

GENTNER, D., GRUDIN, J., LAROCHELLE, S., NORMAN, D. & RUMELHART, D. (1983). A glossary of terms including a classification of typing errors. In W. E. COOPER, Ed. Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting , Chapter 2, pp. 39-44. New York: Springer-Verlag.

[12]

GILLAN, D., HOLDEN, K., ADAM, S., RUDISILL, M. & MAGEE, L. (1990). How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging? Proceedings of CHI , pp. 227-234. New York: ACM.

[13]

GLENNEN, S. & DECOSTE, D. (1997). Handbook of Augmentative and Alternative Communication . San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.

[14]

GREENSTEIN, J. & ARNAUT, L. (1987). Human factors aspects of manual computer input devices. In G. SALVENDY, Ed. Handbook of Human Factors . Chapter 11.4, pp. 1450-1489. New York: Wiley.

[15]

GRUDIN, J. (1983). Error patterns in novice and skilled transcription typing. In W. E. COOPER, Ed. Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting , Chapter 6, pp. 121-139. New York: Springer-Verlag.

[16]

HORSTMANN, H. & LEVINE, S. (1991). The effectiveness of word prediction. Resna'91: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference , pp. 100-102, Washington, DC: Resna Press.

[17]

HORSTMANN KOESTER, H. & LEVINE, S. (1994). Learning and performance of able-bodied individuals using scanning systems with and without word prediction. Assistive Technology , 6 , 42-53.

[18]

LAZZARO, J. J. (1995). Adapting PCs for Disabilities . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

[19]

LEE, C. (1989). Access to Microsoft Windows 2.0 for users with physical disabilites. Resna'89: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference , pp. 23-24. Washington DC: Resna Press.

[20]

LEE, C. & VANDERHEIDEN, G. (1987). Keyboard equivalent for mouse input. In Resna'87 Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference , pp. 711-713. Washington, DC: Resna Press.

[21]

LEE, K. S. & THOMAS, D. J. (1990). Control of Computer - Based Technology for People with Physical Disabilities: an Assessment Manual . Canada: University of Toronto Press.

[22]

MACKENZIE, S. & BUXTON, W. (1994). Prediction of pointing and dragging times in graphical user interfaces. Interacting With Computers . 6 , 213-227.

[23]

MACKENZIE, S., SELLEN A. & BUXTON, W. (1991). A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. In Proceedings of CHI , pp. 161-166. New York: ACM.

[24]

MCMILLAN, W. W. (1992). Computing for users with special needs and models of computer -human interaction. Proceedings of CHI , pp. 143-148. New York: ACM.

[25]

MILLAR, S. V. & NISBET, P. D. (1993). Accelerated Writing for People with Disabilities . CALL Centre and Scottish Office Education Department, CALL Centre, University of Edinburgh. ISBN 1 898042 01 2.

[26]

MILLER, D. & SWAIN, A. (1987). Human error and human reliability. In G. SALVENDY, Ed. Handbook of Human Factors , Chapter 2.8, pp. 219-250. New York: Wiley.

[27]

NEWELL, A. (1995). Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction. In A. D. N. EDWARDS, Ed. Extra - Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities , Chapter 1, pp. 3-18, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[28]

NEWELL, A., ARNOTT, J., CAIRNS, A., RICKETTS, I. & GREGOR, P. (1995). Intelligent systems for speech and language impaired people: a portfolio of research. In A. D. N. EDWARDS, Ed. Extra - Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities , Chapter 5, pp. 83-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[29]

NISBET, P. D. & POON, P. (1998). Special Access Technology . CALL Centre and Scottish Office Education Department, CALL Centre, University of Edinburgh. ISBN 1 898042 11 X.

[30]

NOMAN, D. A. (1983). Design rules based on analyses of human error. Communications of the ACM , 26 , 254-258.

Digital Library

[31]

NOVAK, M., SCHAUER, J., HINKENS, J. & VANDERHEIDEN, G. (1991). Providing computer access features under DOS. Resna'91: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference , pp. 163-165. Washington, DC: Resna Press.

[32]

NOVAK, M. & VANDERHEIDEN, G. (1993). Extending the user interface for X windows to include persons with disabilities. Resna'93: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference , pp. 435-436. Washington, DC: Resna Press.

[33]

PETERSON, J. (1980). Computer programs for detecting and correcting spelling errors. Communications of the ACM 23 , 676-687.

Digital Library

[34]

POULSON, D., ASHBY, M. & RICHARDSON, S. (1996). Userfit: a practical handbook on user-centred design for Assistive Technology. TIDE 1062 USER project, European Commission, Brussels-Luxembourg.

[35]

RIVIERE, C. & THAKOR, N. (1996). Effects of age and disability on tracking tasks with a computer mouse: accuracy and linearity. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development , 33 , 6-15.

[36]

ROBERTS, T. L. & MORAN, T. P. (1983). The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results. Communications of the ACM , 26 , 265-283.

Digital Library

[37]

SCHWARTZ, P. & MILCHUS, K. (1992). A simple-to-use software assessment package for testing cursor control ability. Resna'92: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference , pp. 156-158. Washington, DC: Resna Press.

[38]

SHAW, R., LOOMIS, A. & CRISMAN, E. (1995). Input and integration: Enabling technologies for disabled users. In A. D. N. EDWARDS, Ed. Extra - Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities , Chapter 13, pp. 263-278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[39]

SYSTAT (1992). SYSTAT: Statistics, Version 5.2 Edition . SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.

[40]

TREWIN, S. (1998). InputLogger: general-purpose logging of keyboard and mouse events on an Apple Macintosh. Behaviour Research Methods , Instruments and Computers , 30 , 327-331.

[41]

TREWIN, S. & PAIN, H. (1998). A study of two keyboard aids to accessibility. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction 98 , 1-4 September, Sheffield, UK.

[42]

TREWIN, S. & PAIN, H. (in press). A model of keyboard configuration requirements. Behaviour & Information Technology .

[43]

VANDERHEIDEN, G. C. (1992). Making software more accessible for people with disabilities. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Release 1.2.

[44]

VANDERHEIDEN, P. (1985). Writing aids. In J. WEBSTER, A. COOK, W. TOMPKINS & G. VANDERHEIDEN, Eds. Electronic Devices for Rehabilitation , Chapter 10, pp. 262-282. Medical Instrumentation and Clinical Engineering Series. London: Chapman & Hall.

Cited By

Yamagami MSteele KBurden SBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Decoding Intent With Control Theory: Comparing Muscle Versus Manual Interface PerformanceProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376224(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376224
Keates S(2018)When Universal Access Does not Go to Plan: Lessons to Be LearnedUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Technologies, and Users10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_6(75-90)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_6
Augstein MNeumayr TKurschl WKern DBurger TAltmann JBielikova MHerder EDesmarais MCena F(2017)A Personalized Interaction ApproachAdjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3099023.3099051(221-226)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3099023.3099051
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
2. Social and professional topics

Recommendations

A virtual logo keyboard for people with motor disabilities
Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE'07)

In our society, people with motor impairments are often times socially excluded from their environment. This is unfortunate because every human being should have the possibility to obtain the necessary conditions to live a normal life. Although there is ...
Usability test of 3Dconnexion 3D mice versus keyboard + mouse in Second Life undertaken by people with motor disabilities due to medullary lesions

The use of keyboard and mouse combinations to navigate 3D environments of virtual worlds requires the coordination of both hands in order for the 2D degrees of motion of the mouse to transform into the variety of motions available in a 3D space. Such ...
Personalizable Alternative Mouse and Keyboard Interface for People with Motor Disabilities of Neuromuscular Origin
ASSETS '22: Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

People with motor disabilities of neuromuscular origin often struggle with operating the computer through a commercially available mouse and QWERTY keyboard. This work presents an alternative mouse and keyboard interface, which is personalizable to meet ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Volume 50, Issue 2

Feb. 1999

104 pages

ISSN:1071-5819

Editor:
B. R. Gaines
The Univ., Alberta, Canada

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Academic Press.

Publisher

Academic Press, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 1999

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

52
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yamagami MSteele KBurden SBernhaupt RMueller FVerweij DAndres JMcGrenere JCockburn AAvellino IGoguey ABjørn PZhao SSamson BKocielnik R(2020)Decoding Intent With Control Theory: Comparing Muscle Versus Manual Interface PerformanceProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376224(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376224
Keates S(2018)When Universal Access Does not Go to Plan: Lessons to Be LearnedUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Technologies, and Users10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_6(75-90)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_6
Augstein MNeumayr TKurschl WKern DBurger TAltmann JBielikova MHerder EDesmarais MCena F(2017)A Personalized Interaction ApproachAdjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3099023.3099051(221-226)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3099023.3099051
Keates S(2017)Measuring acceptable inputUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-016-0498-416:3(713-723)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10209-016-0498-4
Pérez JArrue M(2016)Virtual cursors to enhance web accessibility for people with limited dexterityACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/2961108.2961109(3-11)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2961108.2961109
Pérez JValencia XArrue MAbascal JGay GGuerreiro T(2016)A usability evaluation of two virtual aids to enhance cursor accessibility for people with motor impairmentsProceedings of the 13th International Web for All Conference10.1145/2899475.2899489(1-4)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2899475.2899489
Hartikainen MOvaska SYesilada YBigham J(2015)People with Parkinson's Disease Using ComputersProceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility10.1145/2700648.2811393(407-408)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2700648.2811393
Hurst AHudson SMankoff JTrewin S(2013)Distinguishing Users By Pointing Performance in Laboratory and Real-World TasksACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/25170395:2(1-27)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2517039
Anthony LKim YFindlater LMackay WBrewster SBødker S(2013)Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairmentsProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2470654.2466158(1223-1232)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2470654.2466158
Quade MRieger AAlbayrak S(2013)Requirements for Applying Simulation-Based Automated Usability Evaluation to Model-Based Adaptive User Interfaces for Smart EnvironmentsProceedings of the First International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions - Volume 802810.1007/978-3-642-39351-8_26(235-244)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-39351-8_26
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents