Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/951949.952133guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Sentiment Analyzer: Extracting Sentiments about a Given Topic using Natural Language Processing Techniques

Published: 19 November 2003 Publication History

Abstract

We present Sentiment Analyzer (SA) that extracts sentiment(or opinion) about a subject from online text documents.Instead of classifying the sentiment of an entire documentabout a subject, SA detects all references to the givensubject, and determines sentiment in each of the referencesusing natural language processing (NLP) techniques. Oursentiment analysis consists of 1) a topic specific featureterm extraction, 2) sentiment extraction, and 3) (subject,sentiment) association by relationship analysis. SA utilizestwo linguistic resources for the analysis: the sentiment lexiconand the sentiment pattern database. The performanceof the algorithms was verified on online product review articles("digital camera" and "music" reviews), and moregeneral documents including general webpages and newsarticles.

References

[1]
M. Berland and E. Charniak. Finding parts in very large corpora. In Proc. of the 37th ACL Conf., pages 57-64, 1999.
[2]
S. Das and M. Chen. Yahoo! for anazon: Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. In Proc. of the 8th APFA, 2001.
[3]
K. Dave, S. Lawrence, and D. M. Pennock. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proc. of the 12th Int. WWW Conf., 2003.
[4]
T. E. Dunning. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 1993.
[5]
V. Hatzivassiloglou and K. R. McKeown. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proc. of the 35th ACL Conf., pages 174-181, 1997.
[6]
M. Hearst. Direction-based text interpretation as an information access refinement. Text-Based Intelligent Systems, 1992.
[7]
B. Katz. From sentence processing to information access on the world wide web. In Proc. of AAAI Spring Symp. on NLP, 1997.
[8]
H. Li and K. Yamanishi. Mining from open answers in questionnaire data. In Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGKDD Conf., 2001.
[9]
C. Manning and H. Schutze. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, 1999.
[10]
M. P. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19, 1993.
[11]
G. A. Miller. Nouns in WordNet: A lexical inheritance system. Int. J. of Lexicography, 2(4):245-264, 1990. Also available from ftp://ftp.cogsci.princeton.edu/pub/wordnet/5papers.ps.
[12]
S. Morinaga, K. Yamanishi, K. Teteishi, and T. Fukushima. Mining product reputations on the web. In Proc. of the 8th ACM SIGKDD Conf., 2002.
[13]
B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proc. of the 2002 ACL EMNLP Conf., pages 79-86, 2002.
[14]
A. Ratnaparkhi. A maximum entropy model for part-of-speech tagging. In Proc. of the EMNLP Conf., plges 133- 142, 1996.
[15]
L. Rovinelli and C. Whissell. Emotion and style in 30-second television advertisements targeted at men, women, boys, and girls. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86:1048-1050, 1998.
[16]
W. Sack. On the computation of point of view. In Proc. of the 12th AAAI Conf., 1994.
[17]
P. Subasic and A. Huettner. Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, Special Issue, Aug., 2001.
[18]
L. Terveen, W. Hill, B. Amento, D. McDonald, and J. Creter. PHOAKS: A system for sharing recommendations. CACM, 40(3):59-62, 1997.
[19]
R. M. Tong. An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussion. In SIGIR Workshop on Operational Text Classification, 2001.
[20]
P. D. Turney. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proc. of the 40th ACL Conf., pages 417-424, 2002.
[21]
C. Whissell. The dictionary of affect in language. Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, pages 113-131.
[22]
J. M. Wiebe. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In Proc. of the 17th AAAI Conf., 2000.
[23]
C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in the lanuage modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proc. of the 10th Information and Knowledge Management Conf., 2001.
[24]
Y. Zhang, W. Xu, and J. Callan. Exact maximum likelihood estimation for word mixtures. In ICML Workshop on Text Learning, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Sentiment Analysis of Film Review Texts Based on Sentiment Dictionary and SVMProceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3319921.3319966(73-77)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Quantifying Customer Review by Integrating Multiple Source of KnowledgeProceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing10.1145/3318299.3318309(6-11)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Machine Learning for Smart Building ApplicationsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/331195052:2(1-36)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
ICDM '03: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
November 2003
ISBN:0769519784

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 19 November 2003

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Sentiment Analysis of Film Review Texts Based on Sentiment Dictionary and SVMProceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3319921.3319966(73-77)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Quantifying Customer Review by Integrating Multiple Source of KnowledgeProceedings of the 2019 11th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing10.1145/3318299.3318309(6-11)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
  • (2019)Machine Learning for Smart Building ApplicationsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/331195052:2(1-36)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2019
  • (2019)GistSoft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications10.1007/s00500-017-2882-223:5(1589-1601)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019
  • (2018)A Collaborative Approach for Improvisation and Refinement of Requirement Prioritization ProcessJournal of Information Technology Research10.4018/JITR.201804010811:2(128-149)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • (2018)Modeling Customers and Products with Word Embeddings from Receipt DataProceedings of the 22nd International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium10.1145/3216122.3229860(246-252)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2018
  • (2018)Opinion Target Extraction from Arabic News Articles Using shallow FeaturesProceedings of the 2nd Mediterranean Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence10.1145/3177148.3180102(113-118)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2018
  • (2018)Research on the Validity of Online Commodity Reviews Based on Word2vecProceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering 201810.1145/3148453.3306260(1-4)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Sentiment analysis of Chinese micro-blog text based on extended sentiment dictionaryFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2017.09.04881:C(395-403)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • (2017)A language-model-based approach for subjectivity detectionJournal of Information Science10.1177/016555151664181843:3(356-377)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media