Article

Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment

Authors:

Peter Gärdenfors,

David MakinsonAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge

Pages 83 - 95

Published: 01 March 1988 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

Cited By

View all

Jin YThielscher M(2007)Iterated belief revision, revisedArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2006.11.002171:1(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.artint.2006.11.002
Van Der Westhuizen PVan Der Poll JLabuschagne W(2006)Templated revisionProceedings of the 2006 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries10.1145/1216262.1216286(218-229)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2006
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1216262.1216286
Luan SDai G(2005)A computational approach for belief changeProceedings of the 2005 international conference on Computational Intelligence and Security - Volume Part I10.1007/11596448_51(355-360)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2005
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/11596448_51
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment
TARK '88: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge

A major problem for knowledge representation is how to revise a knowledge system in the light of new information that is inconsistent with what is already in the system. Another related problem is that of contractions, where some of the information in ...
Refined Epistemic Entrenchment

Epistemic entrenchment, as presented by Gärdenfors and Makinson (1988) and Gärdenfors (1988), is a formalisation of the intuition that, when forced to choose between two beliefs, an agent will give up the less entrenched one. While their formalisation ...
Epistemic-entrenchment characterization of Parikh's Axiom
IJCAI'17: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

In this article, we provide the epistemic-entrenchment characterization of the weak version of Parikh's relevance-sensitive axiom for belief revision -- known as axiom (P) -- for the general case of incomplete theories. Loosely speaking, axiom (P) ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge

March 1988

372 pages

ISBN:0934613664

Editor:
Moshe Y. Vardi

Publisher

Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

San Francisco, CA, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 March 1988

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Jin YThielscher M(2007)Iterated belief revision, revisedArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2006.11.002171:1(1-18)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.artint.2006.11.002
Van Der Westhuizen PVan Der Poll JLabuschagne W(2006)Templated revisionProceedings of the 2006 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries10.1145/1216262.1216286(218-229)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2006
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1216262.1216286
Luan SDai G(2005)A computational approach for belief changeProceedings of the 2005 international conference on Computational Intelligence and Security - Volume Part I10.1007/11596448_51(355-360)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2005
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/11596448_51
Lau RBruza PSong DSanderson MJärvelin KAllan JBruza P(2004)Belief revision for adaptive information retrievalProceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval10.1145/1008992.1009017(130-137)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2004
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1008992.1009017
Fermé ERott H(2004)Revision by comparisonArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2004.04.007157:1-2(5-47)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2004
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.artint.2004.04.007
Lau R(2003)Context-sensitive text mining and belief revision for intelligent information retrieval on the webWeb Intelligence and Agent Systems10.5555/1016416.10164171:3-4(151-172)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1016416.1016417
Nayak APagnucco MPeppas P(2003)Dynamic belief revision operatorsArtificial Intelligence10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00017-1146:2(193-228)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2003
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/S0004-3702%2803%2900017-1
Condoravdi CCrouch DEverett JPaiva VStolle RBobrow Dvan den Berg MGuarino NSmith BWelty C(2001)Preventing existenceProceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 200110.1145/505168.505184(162-173)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2001
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/505168.505184
(2001)Plausibility measures and default reasoningJournal of the ACM10.1145/502090.50209248:4(648-685)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2001
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/502090.502092
Losada DBarreiro AGey FHearst MTong R(1999)Using a belief revision operator for document ranking in extended Boolean modelsProceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval10.1145/312624.312654(66-73)Online publication date: 1-Aug-1999
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/312624.312654
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Abstract

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment

Refined Epistemic Entrenchment

Epistemic-entrenchment characterization of Parikh's Axiom

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations