Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/3370272.3370281dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescasconConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

City on the river: visualizing temporal collaboration

Published: 04 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Collaboration is an important component of most work activities. We are interested in understanding how configurations of people come together to create outputs over time. We propose an interactive visualization tool (City on the River) for visualizing collaborations over time. The City on the River (CotR) visualization shows the contributions and artifacts ("products") of a team on a timeline and the individuals on the team who contributed to each product. CotR enables interactive analyses of each of these components for answering questions such as, which people work together on the most products, which products involve the most people, what kinds of products were produced when and by whom, etc. CotR can be used for analyzing diverse domains such as research collaborations, conference participation, email conversations, and software development. In this paper, we present the results of an experiment to assess CotR for analyzing collaboration and outcomes in GitHub projects. We compared the quality of answers, time to answer, and approaches taken to analyze the project collaborations by two groups of people: one group used the GitHub data displayed in a spreadsheet; the other group used the GitHub data displayed using CotR.

References

[1]
Youn ah Kang, C. Gorg, and J. Stasko. 2009. Evaluating visual analytics systems for investigative analysis: Deriving design principles from a case study. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2009. VAST 2009. IEEE Symposium on. 139--146.
[2]
Jacob T. Biehl, Mary Czerwinski, Greg Smith, and George G. Robertson. 2007. FASTDash: A Visual Dashboard for Fostering Awareness in Software Teams. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1313--1322.
[3]
David M Blei and John D Lafferty. 2006. Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning. ACM, 113--120.
[4]
Cleidson R. de Souza, Stephen Quirk, Erik Trainer, and David F. Redmiles. 2007. Supporting Collaborative Software Development Through the Visualization of Socio-technical Dependencies. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--156.
[5]
B. Ens, D. Rea, R. Shpaner, H. Hemmati, J.E. Young, and P. Irani. 2014. ChronoTwigger: A Visual Analytics Tool for Understanding Source and Test Co-evolution. In Software Visualization (VISSOFT), 2014 Second IEEE Working Conference on. 117--126.
[6]
Danyel Fisher and Paul Dourish. 2004. Social and Temporal Structures in Everyday Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 551--558.
[7]
Eric Gilbert and Karrie Karahalios. 2007. CodeSaw: A Social Visualization of Distributed Software Development. In Human-Computer Interaction âĂŞ INTERACT 2007, CÃl'cilia Baranauskas, Philippe Palanque, Julio Abascal, and Simone-DinizJunqueira Barbosa (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4663. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 303--316.
[8]
Peter A Gloor and Yan Zhao. 2004. Tecflow-a temporal communication flow visualizer for social networks analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM CSCW workshop on social networks. ACM CSCW Conference, Chicago.
[9]
Susan Havre, Elizabeth Hetzler, Paul Whitney, and Lucy Nowell. 2002. ThemeRiver: Visualizing Thematic Changes in Large Document Collections. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8, 1 (Jan. 2002), 9--20.
[10]
Indratmo, Julita Vassileva, and Carl Gutwin. 2008. Exploring Blog Archives with Interactive Visualization. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--46.
[11]
R.G. Kula, C. De Roover, D. German, T. Ishio, and K. Inoue. 2014. Visualizing the Evolution of Systems and Their Library Dependencies. In Software Visualization (VISSOFT), 2014 Second IEEE Working Conference on. 127--136.
[12]
Dixin Luo and Kelly Lyons. 2017. CASCONet: A Conference dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.09485 (2017).
[13]
C. North. 2006. Toward measuring visualization insight. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 26, 3 (May 2006), 6--9.
[14]
Michael Ogawa and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2010. Software Evolution Storylines. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Software Visualization (SOFTVIS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--42.
[15]
C. Plaisant and B. Shneiderman. 2005. Show Me! Guidelines for producing recorded demonstrations. In Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, 2005 IEEE Symposium on. 171--178.
[16]
S. Rufiange and G. Melancon. 2014. AniMatrix: A Matrix-Based Visualization of Software Evolution. In Software Visualization (VISSOFT), 2014 Second IEEE Working Conference on. 137--146.
[17]
Iflaah Salman, Ayse Tosun Misirli, and Natalia Juristo. 2015. Are Students Representatives of Professionals in Software Engineering Experiments?. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM, 666--675.
[18]
A. Sarma, L. Maccherone, P. Wagstrom, and J. Herbsleb. 2009. Tesseract: Interactive visual exploration of socio-technical relationships in software development. In Software Engineering, 2009. ICSE 2009. IEEE 31st International Conference on. 23--33.
[19]
Mark Steyvers and Tom Griffiths. 2007. Probabilistic topic models. Handbook of latent semantic analysis 427, 7 (2007), 424--440.
[20]
Y. Tanahashi and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2012. Design Considerations for Optimizing Storyline Visualizations. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 18, 12 (Dec 2012), 2679--2688.
[21]
Edward R Tufte and PR Graves-Morris. 1983. The visual display of quantitative information. Vol. 2. Graphics press Cheshire, CT.
[22]
J.J. van Wijk. 2005. The value of visualization. In Visualization, 2005. VIS 05. IEEE. 79--86.
[23]
Fernanda B. Viégas and Marc Smith. 2004. Newsgroup Crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the Activity of Individuals in Conversational Cyberspaces. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 4 - Volume 4 (HICSS '04). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 40109.2--. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=962752.962972
[24]
Ji Soo Yi, Niklas Elmqvist, and Seungyoon Lee. 2010. TimeMatrix: Analyzing temporal social networks using interactive matrix-based visualizations. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26, 11-12 (2010), 1031--1051.
[25]
Ji Soo Yi, Niklas Elmqvist, and Seungyoon Lee. 2010. TimeMatrix: Analyzing Temporal Social Networks Using Interactive Matrix-Based Visualizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26, 11-12 (2010), 1031--1051.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
CASCON '19: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering
November 2019
421 pages

Publisher

IBM Corp.

United States

Publication History

Published: 04 November 2019

Author Tags

  1. collaboration
  2. software engineering
  3. visualization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 24 of 90 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 44
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media