Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/3172077.3172382guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Link prediction via ranking metric dual-level attention network learning

Published: 19 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Link prediction is a challenging problem for complex network analysis, arising in many disciplines such as social networks and telecommunication networks. Currently, many existing approaches estimate the proximity of the link endpoints from the local neighborhood around them for link prediction, which suffer from the localized view of network connections. In this paper, we consider the problem of link prediction from the viewpoint of learning path-based proximity ranking metric embedding. We propose a novel proximity ranking metric attention network learning framework by jointly exploiting both node-level and path-level attention proximity of the endpoints to their betweenness paths for learning the discriminative feature representation for link prediction. We then develop the path-based dual-level attentional learning method with multi-step reasoning process for proximity ranking metric embedding. The extensive experiments on two large-scale datasets show that our method achieves better performance than other state-of-the-art solutions to the problem.

References

[1]
Priyanka Agrawal, Vikas K Garg, and Ramasuri Narayanam. Link label prediction in signed social networks. In IJCAI , 2013.
[2]
Bokai Cao, Xiangnan Kong, and S Yu Philip. Collective prediction of multiple types of links in heterogeneous information networks. In ICDM , pages 50- 59. IEEE, 2014.
[3]
Shiyu Chang, Wei Han, Jiliang Tang, Guo-Jun Qi, Charu C Aggarwal, and Thomas S Huang. Heterogeneous network embedding via deep architectures. In SIGKDD , pages 119-128. ACM, 2015.
[4]
Yuan Fang, Wenqing Lin, Vincent W Zheng, Min Wu, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, and Xiao-Li Li. Semantic proximity search on graphs with metagraph-based learning. In ICDE , pages 277-288. IEEE, 2016.
[5]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , 9(8):1735-1780, 1997.
[6]
Leo Katz. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika , 18(1):39-43, 1953.
[7]
Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , 2014.
[8]
Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In WWW , pages 641-650. ACM, 2010.
[9]
David Liben-Nowell and Jon Kleinberg. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American society for information science and technology , 58(7):1019-1031, 2007.
[10]
Dekang Lin. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In ICML , volume 98, pages 296-304. Citeseer, 1998.
[11]
Xiaozhong Liu, Yingying Yu, Chun Guo, and Yizhou Sun. Meta-path-based ranking with pseudo relevance feedback on heterogeneous graph for citation recommendation. In CIKM , pages 121-130. ACM, 2014.
[12]
Zemin Liu, Vincent W Zheng, Zhou Zhao, Fanwei Zhu, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Minghui Wu, and Jing Ying. Semantic proximity search on heterogeneous graph by proximity embedding. 2017.
[13]
Linyuan Lü, Ci-Hang Jin, and Tao Zhou. Similarity index based on local paths for link prediction of complex networks. Physical Review E , 80(4):046122, 2009.
[14]
Víctor Martínez, Fernando Berzal, and Juan-Carlos Cubero. A survey of link prediction in complex networks. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , 49(4):69, 2016.
[15]
Aditya Krishna Menon and Charles Elkan. Link prediction via matrix factorization. In ECML/PKDD , pages 437-452. Springer, 2011.
[16]
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In NIPS , pages 3111-3119, 2013.
[17]
Kurt Miller, Michael I Jordan, and Thomas L Griffiths. Nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. In NIPS , pages 1276-1284, 2009.
[18]
Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations. In SIGKDD , pages 701-710. ACM, 2014.
[19]
Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, Rob Fergus, et al. End-to-end memory networks. In NIPS , pages 2440-2448, 2015.
[20]
Yizhou Sun, Brandon Norick, Jiawei Han, Xifeng Yan, Philip S Yu, and Xiao Yu. Pathselclus: Integrating meta-path selection with user-guided object clustering in heterogeneous information networks. TKDD , 7(3):11, 2013.
[21]
Jian Tang, Meng Qu, Mingzhe Wang, Ming Zhang, Jun Yan, and Qiaozhu Mei. Line: Large-scale information network embedding. In WWW .
[22]
Chao Wang, Venu Satuluri, and Srinivasan Parthasarathy. Local probabilistic models for link prediction. In ICDM , pages 322-331. IEEE, 2007.
[23]
Daixin Wang, Peng Cui, and Wenwu Zhu. Structural deep network embedding. In SIGKDD , pages 1225-1234. ACM, 2016.
[24]
Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron C Courville, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Richard S Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. In ICML , volume 14, pages 77-81, 2015.
[25]
Cheng Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Deli Zhao, Maosong Sun, and Edward Y Chang. Network representation learning with rich text information.
[26]
Jiawei Zhang, Philip S Yu, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. Meta-path based multi-network collective link prediction. In SIGKDD , pages 1286-1295. ACM, 2014.
[27]
Zhou Zhao, Lijun Zhang, Xiaofei He, and Wilfred Ng. Expert finding for question answering via graph regularized matrix completion. TKDE , 27(4):993- 1004, 2015.
[28]
Zhou Zhao, Xiaofei He, Deng Cai, Lijun Zhang, Wilfred Ng, and Yueting Zhuang. Graph regularized feature selection with data reconstruction. TKDE , 28(3):689-700, 2016.
[29]
Zhou Zhao, Hanqing Lu, Deng Cai, Xiaofei He, and Yueting Zhuang. User preference learning for online social recommendation. TKDE , 28(9):2522- 2534, 2016.
[30]
Jun Zhu, Jiaming Song, and Bei Chen. Max-margin nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. PAMI , 2016.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)An Attentive Survey of Attention ModelsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/346505512:5(1-32)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Feature Fusion Based Subgraph Classification for Link PredictionProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3340531.3411966(985-994)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2020
  • (2018)Engineering graph features via network functional blocksProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304652.3304838(5749-5753)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
IJCAI'17: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
August 2017
5253 pages
ISBN:9780999241103

Sponsors

  • Australian Comp Soc: Australian Computer Society
  • NSF: National Science Foundation
  • Griffith University
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • AI Journal: AI Journal

Publisher

AAAI Press

Publication History

Published: 19 August 2017

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)An Attentive Survey of Attention ModelsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/346505512:5(1-32)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Feature Fusion Based Subgraph Classification for Link PredictionProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3340531.3411966(985-994)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2020
  • (2018)Engineering graph features via network functional blocksProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304652.3304838(5749-5753)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media