Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Understanding the Impact of Individual Differences on Learner Performance Using Hypermedia Systems

Published: 01 January 2017 Publication History

Abstract

In recent studies, there has been focus on understanding learner performance and behaviour using Web-Based Instruction WBI systems which accommodate individual differences. Studies have investigated the performance of these differences individually such as gender, cognitive style and prior knowledge. In this article, the authors describe a case-study using a large student user base. They analysed the performance of combinations of individual differences to investigate how each investigated item influenced learning performance. The data was filtered to validate the data mining findings in order to investigate the sensitivity of the results. Moving data threshold was used to evaluate their findings and to understand what could affect the performance. The authors found that certain combinations of individual differences altered a learner's performance level significantly using Data mining techniques. They conclude that designers of WBI applications need to consider the combination of individual differences rather than considering them individually in measuring learners' performance.

References

[1]
Al-HajriR.Al-HunaiyyanA. 2011. Accommodating User Preferences in Designing Computer Based Learning Interfaces.Proceedings of the International e-Learning Conference IEC '11, Bangkok, Thailand.
[2]
Alhajri, R. A., Counsell, S., & Liu, X. 2013a. Investigating attributes affecting the performance of WBI users. Computers & Education, 68, 117 - 128.
[3]
Alhajri, R. A., Counsell, S., & Liu, X. 2013b. The effect of individual difference on learning performance using web-based instruction. Proceedings of the 10th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education IFIP-WCCE '13, Poland Vol. 3, pp. 189-190.
[4]
Alhajri, R. A., Counsell, S., & Liu, X. 2013c, July 29-31. Accommodating Individual Differences in Web Based Instruction WBI and Implementation. Proceedings of the 10th International conference on E-Business ICE-B '13, Iceland pp. 281-289.
[5]
Alhajri, R. A., Counsell, S., & Liu, X. 2013d, December 2-4. The Influence of Multiple Human Factors on Learner Preferences Using Hypermedia Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services IC3e '13, Malaysia. 10.1109/IC3e.2013.6735956
[6]
BeckwithL.BurnettM.WiedenbeckS.CookC. 2005. Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: are there gender issues?Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'05, Portland, OR, USA pp. 869-878. New York, NY: ACM Press.10.1145/1054972.1055094
[7]
Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A., & Underwood, J. 2005. Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 444, 441-457.
[8]
Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. 2003. Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 192, 135-145.
[9]
Chen, S. Y., Fan, J., & Macredie, R. D. 2006. Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 222, 251-266.
[10]
Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. 2008. An Integrated Approach for Modeling Learning Patterns of Students in Web-Based Instruction: A Cognitive Style Perspective. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 151, 1-28.
[11]
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. 2010. Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors. International Journal of Information Management, 305, 379-387.
[12]
Farrell, I. H., & Moore, D. M. 2001. The effect of navigation tools on learners achievement and attitude in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 292, 169-181.
[13]
Ford, N., & Chen, S. 2000. Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 281-311.
[14]
Ford, N., & Chen, S. 2001. Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 321, 5-22.
[15]
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. 1998. How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis. The Computer Journal, 418, 578-588.
[16]
Frias-Martinez, E., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. 2008. Investigation of behavior and perception of digital library users: A cognitive style perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 285, 355-365.
[17]
Frias-Martinez, E., Chen, S. Y., Macredie, R. D., & Liu, X. 2007. The role of human factors in stereotyping behavior and perception of digital library users: A robust clustering approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 173, 305-337.
[18]
Gargano, M. L., & Raggad, B. G. 1999. Data mining-A powerful information creating tool. OCLC Systems & Services, 152, 81-90.
[19]
Hand, D. J. 2007. Principles of Data Mining. Drug Safety, 307, 621-622. 17604416.
[20]
Hedberg, S. R. 1995. The data gold rush. Byte, 2010, 83-88.
[21]
Hölscher, C., & Strube, G. 2000. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks, 331-6, 337-346.
[22]
Hupfer, M. E., & Detlor, B. 2006. Gender and web information seeking: A self concept orientation model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 578, 1105-1115.
[23]
Jain, A., & Dubes, R. 1999. Data clustering. ACM Computing Surveys, 313, 264-323.
[24]
Kim, K. S. 2001. Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 133, 323-340.
[25]
Large, A., Beheshti, J., & Rahman, T. 2002. Gender differences in collaborative web searching behavior: An elementary school study. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, 383, 427-443.
[26]
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. 1998. Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 401, 18-27.
[27]
Messick, S. 1976. Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[28]
Mitchell, T. J., Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. 2005a. Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: Domain expertise vs. system expertise. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 211, 53-64.
[29]
Mitchell, T. J., Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. 2005b. The relationship between web enjoyment and student perceptions and learning using a web-based tutorial. Learning, Media and Technology, 301, 27-40.
[30]
Pallant, J. 2013. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS 5th ed. Berkshire, England: McGraw Hill.
[31]
Reed, W. M., & Oughton, M. J. 1998. The Effects of Hypermedia Knowledge and Learning Style on the Construction of Group Concept Maps. Computers in Human Behavior, 141, 1-22.
[32]
Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. G. 1998. Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton.
[33]
Roussinov, D., & Zhao, J. L. 2003. Automatic discovery of similarity relationships through Web mining. Decision Support Systems, 351, 149-166.
[34]
Roy, M., Taylor, R., & Chi, M. T. 2003. Gender differences in patterns of searching the web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 293, 335-348.
[35]
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. 2001. Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 171, 95-110.
[36]
Shin, E., Schallert, D., & Savenye, C. 1994. Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 421, 33-46.
[37]
Wang, M., Rees, S. J., & Liao, S. Y. 2002. Building an online purchasing behavior analytical system with neural network. In WIT Transactions on information and communication technologies. WIT Press.
[38]
Weiser, E. B. 2000. Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: A two sample comparison. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 32, 167-177.
[39]
Weller, G. H., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. 1994. The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive styles in hypermedia-based instruction: Implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 103-4, 401-420.
[40]
Wildemuth, B. M. 2004. The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 553, 246-258.
[41]
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. 1977. Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 471, 1-64.
[42]
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. 2011. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
[43]
Workman, M. 2004. Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: Do cognitive styles make a difference? Computers in Human Behavior, 204, 517-534.
  1. Understanding the Impact of Individual Differences on Learner Performance Using Hypermedia Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies
    International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies  Volume 12, Issue 1
    January 2017
    65 pages
    ISSN:1548-1093
    EISSN:1548-1107
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    IGI Global

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2017

    Author Tags

    1. HCI
    2. Hypermedia Systems
    3. Individual Differences
    4. Learner's Performance
    5. Web-Based Instruction

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 0
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media