Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/3021955.3022029acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sentiment Analysis: Comparing the use of tools and the human analysis

Published: 17 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Sentiment Analysis emerged from the need to treat and evaluate texts, opinions and comments made by users on the Internet, in order to understand how they relate to a given entity. Several analytical methods have been developed in an attempt to better translate the uncertain and the subjectivity of human feelings. This research used data from interactions in a social network to identify the sentiments involved in each student comment. From the collected text different methods of sentiment analysis were used in order to identify which method had better results compared to the real ones. The comparison showed differences between these results and the real ones: while the used tools classified more than 40% of the comments as neutral, the analysis of the messages' author showed that 71% of the comments were positive. In the classification, the occurrence of outliers was identified as well as differences on the intensity of the sentiments acquired with each method. No approach, including the one performed by one of the researchers, was considered efficient enough as the highest level of accuracy obtained was less than 70%.

References

[1]
Abbasi, A., Chen, H., e Salem, A. 2008. Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 12.
[2]
Ahmed, K.; El Tazi, N.; Hossny, A. H. Sentiment Analysis Over Social Networks: An Overview
[3]
Altrabsheh, N., Cocea, M., e Fallahkhair, S. 2014. Learning sentiment from students' feedback for real-time interventions in classrooms. In: Adaptive and Intelligent Systems. Springer International Publishing. p. 40-49.
[4]
Araujo, M. et al. 2013. Metodos para analise de sentimentos no Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia'13).
[5]
Bosco, C.; Patti, V.; Bolioli, A. 2013. Developing corpora for sentiment analysis: The case of irony and senti-tut. IEEE Intelligent Systems, No. 2, p. 55-63.
[6]
Cambria, E.; Hussain, A. 2015. Sentic computing: a common-sense-based framework for concept-level sentiment analysis. Springer. Vol 1. Disponivel em: Acesso em: 20 nov, 2015
[7]
Cambria, E; Livingstone A.; Hussain A. (2012) The Hourglass of Emotions. In: LNCS, Vol 7403. p. 114- 157. Springer.
[8]
Cambria, E.; Grassi, M.; Hussain A.; Havasi C. 2012. Sentic Computing for social media marketing. Springer
[9]
Cervi, E. U., e Massuchin, M. G. 2012. Redes sociais como ferramenta de campanha em disputas subnacionais: analise do Twitter nas eleicoes para o governo do Parana em 2010. Sociedade e Cultura, Vol. 15, No. 1.
[10]
Chamlertwat, W. et al. 2012. Discovering Consumer Insight from Twitter via Sentiment Analysis. J. UCS, Vol. 18, No. 8, p. 973-992.
[11]
de Oliveira, Aletheia Machado. Redes Sociais Virtuais, Blog, Wiki e Moocs, como parte de uma arquitetura pedagogica. 2016. Rehutec, Vol 5, No. 1, p12.
[12]
Duwairi, R. M. 2015. Sentiment analysis for dialectical Arabic. In:Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), 2015 6th International Conference on. IEEE, p. 166-170.
[13]
Huangfu, Y. et al. 2015. An improved sentiment analysis algorithm for Chinese news. In: Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2015 12th International Conference on. IEEE. p. 1366-1371.
[14]
Kechaou, Z.; Ben Ammar, M.; Alimi, A. M. 2011. Improving e-learning with sentiment analysis of users' opinions. In: Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, p. 1032-1038.
[15]
Ortigosa, A.; Martin, J. M.; Carro, R. M. 2014. Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to elearning.Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 31, p. 527-541
[16]
Liu, B. 2012. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining.Synthesis lectures on human language technologies, Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 1-167.
[17]
Mendes Gomes L et al. 2015. Facebook vs moodle: Surveying university students on the use of learning management systems to support learning activities outside the classroom. In: Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2015 10th Iberian Conference on. IEEE, p. 1-4
[18]
Montoyo, A.; MartiNez-Barco, P. ; Balahur, A. 2012. Subjectivity and sentiment analysis: An overview of the current state of the area and envisaged developments.Decision Support Systems, Vol. 53, No. 4, p. 675-679.
[19]
Moreno, A. et al. 2011. Feeling bad on Facebook: Depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depression and anxiety, Vol. 28, No. 6, p. 447-455.
[20]
Nasukawa, T.; Yi, J. 2003. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. In:Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture. ACM. p. 70-77.
[21]
Swets, J. A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, Vol. 240, No. 4857, p. 1285-1293. {22} Thelwall, M.; Buckley K.; Paltoglou G. 2012. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 63, No. 1, p. 163-173.
[22]
Thelwall, M.; Buckley K.; Paltoglou G. 2012. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 63, No. 1, p. 163-173.
[23]
Wang, H. et al. 2012. A system for real-time twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 us presidential election cycle. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics, p. 115-120.
[24]
Waters, R. D. et al. 2009. Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public relations review, Vol. 35, No. 2, p. 102-106.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SBSI '16: Proceedings of the XII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems on Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems in the Cloud Computing Era - Volume 1
May 2016
615 pages
ISBN:9788576693178
  • General Chairs:
  • Frank Siqueira,
  • Patricia Vilain,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Claudia Cappelli,
  • Raul Sidnei Wazlawick

Sponsors

  • FAPESC: Santa Catarina State Research and Innovation Support Foundation
  • FAPEU: Foundation for the Support of University Research and Outreach
  • CAPES: Brazilian Higher Education Funding Council
  • CNPq: National Council for Technological and Scientific Development

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Brazilian Computer Society

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Publication History

Published: 17 May 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Cognitive Information Systems
  2. Emotions
  3. Online Social Networks
  4. Sentiment analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SBSI '16
Sponsor:
  • FAPESC
  • FAPEU
  • CAPES
  • CNPq
SBSI '16: Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
May 17 - 20, 2016
Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

SBSI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 80 of 244 submissions, 33%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 181 of 557 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media