Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/3635637.3663238acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Large Language Model Assissted Multi-Agent Dialogue for Ontology Alignment

Published: 06 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Ontology alignment is critical in cross-domain integration; however, it typically necessitates the involvement of a human domain-expert, which can make the task costly. Although a variety of machine-learning approaches have been proposed that can simplify this task by learning the patterns from experts, such techniques are still susceptible to domain knowledge updates that could potentially change the patterns and lead to extra expert involvement. The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated a general cognitive ability, which has the potential to assist ontology alignment from the cognition level, thus obviating the need for costly expert involvement. However, the process by which the output of LLMs is generated can be opaque and thus the reliability and interpretability of such models is not always predictable. This paper proposes a dialogue model, in which multiple agents negotiate the correspondence between two knowledge sets with the support from an LLM. We demonstrate that this approach not only reduces the need for the involvement of a domain expert for ontology alignment, but that the results are interpretable despite the use of LLMs.

References

[1]
Sébastien Bubeck, Varun Chandrasekaran, Ronen Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, et al. 2023. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712 (2023).
[2]
Jérôme Euzenat and Pavel Shvaiko. 2013. Ontology Matching, Second Edition. Springer.
[3]
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Terry R. Payne, Alessandro Solimando, and Valentina A. M. Tamma. 2016. Limiting Logical Violations in Ontology Alignnment Through Negotiation. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, KR 2016. AAAI Press, 217--226.
[4]
L. Laera, I. Blacoe, V. Tamma, T.R. Payne, J. Euzenat, and T.J.M. Bench-Capon. 2007. Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS. In Int'l Conf. on Auton. Agent and Multi-Agent Syst. (AAMAS). 1285--1292.
[5]
Ying Li Mina Abd Nikooie Pour, Huanyu Li and Patrick Lambrix. 2023. Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative: Anatomy. http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2023/anatomy/index.html Last accessed 2023-09-29.
[6]
Terry R Payne and Valentina Tamma. 2014. Negotiating over ontological correspondences with asymmetric and incomplete knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2014 Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. 517--524.
[7]
Robert Stevens, Phillip Lord, James Malone, and Nicolas Matentzoglu. 2019. Measuring expert performance at manually classifying domain entities under upper ontology classes. Journal of Web Semantics, Vol. 57 (2019), 100469.
[8]
C. Trojahn dos Santos, P. Quaresma, and R. Vieira. 2008. Conjunctive queries for ontology based agent communication in MAS. In Int'l Conf. on Auton. Agent and Multi-Agent Syst. (AAMAS). 829--836.

Index Terms

  1. Large Language Model Assissted Multi-Agent Dialogue for Ontology Alignment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AAMAS '24: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
    May 2024
    2898 pages
    ISBN:9798400704864

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Richland, SC

    Publication History

    Published: 06 May 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. dialogue
    2. large language model
    3. multi-agent system
    4. negotiation
    5. ontology alignment

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract

    Funding Sources

    • National Natural Science Foundation of China
    • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
    • XJTLU Research Development Fund

    Conference

    AAMAS '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 46
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media