research-article

Free access

<StuMaBa>: from deep representation to surface

Authors:

Bernd Bohnet,

Simon Mille,

Benoît Favre,

Leo WannerAuthors Info & Claims

ENLG '11: Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation

Pages 232 - 235

Published: 28 September 2011 Publication History

PDF eReader

Abstract

We realize the full generation pipeline, from the deep (= semantic) representation (SemR), over the shallow (= surface-syntactic) representation (SSyntR) to the surface. To account systematically for the non-isomorphic projection between SemR and SSyntR, we introduce an intermediate representation: the so-called deep-syntactic representation (DSyntR), which does not contain yet (all) function words (as SemR), but which already contains grammatical function relation labels (as SSyntR).

References

[1]

B. Bohnet, L. Wanner, S. Mille, and A. Burga. 2010. Broad coverage multilingual deep sentence generation with a stochastic multi-level realizer. In Proceedings of COLING '10, pages 98--106, Beijing.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

B. Bohnet, S. Mille, and L. Wanner. 2011. Statistical Language Generation from Semantic Structures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependency Linguistics, Barcelona.

Google Scholar

[3]

M. Collins and B. Roark. 2004. Incremental parsing with the perceptron algorithm. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL '04, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

K. Crammer, O. Dekel, S. Shalev-Shwartz, and Y. Singer. 2006. Online Passive-Aggressive Algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:551--585.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

J. Eisner. 1996. Three New Probabilistic Models for Dependency Parsing: An Exploration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96), pages 340--345, Copenhagen.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

R. Kneser and H. Ney. 1995. Improved backing-off for m-gram language modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

Google Scholar

[7]

V. I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics, 10:707--710.

Google Scholar

[8]

I. A. Mel'čuk. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Wanner LMille SBohnet BEugenio BMcRoy S(2012)Towards a surface realization-oriented corpus annotationProceedings of the Seventh International Natural Language Generation Conference10.5555/2392712.2392721(22-30)Online publication date: 30-May-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2392712.2392721
Bohnet BBjörkelund AKuhn JSeeker WZarrieß STsujii JHenderson JPasca M(2012)Generating non-projective word order in statistical linearizationProceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning10.5555/2390948.2391049(928-939)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2390948.2391049
White MRajkumar RTsujii JHenderson JPasca M(2012)Minimal dependency length in realization rankingProceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning10.5555/2390948.2390979(244-255)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2390948.2390979

<StuMaBa>: from deep representation to surface
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Artificial intelligence
2. Hardware
  1. Power and energy
    1. Power estimation and optimization

Recommendations

A feature-guided grammatical system
Parsing minimalist languages
LLLR parsing
SAC '13: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

The idea of an LLLR parsing is presented. An LLLR(k) parser can be constructed for any LR(k) grammar but it produces the left parse of the input string in linear time (in respect to the length of the derivation) without backtracking. If used as a basis ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ENLG '11: Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation

September 2011

336 pages

Program Chairs:
Claire Gardent
CNRS/Loria, Nancy, France
,
Kristina Striegnitz
Union College

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 28 September 2011

Qualifiers

Research-article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 33 of 78 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
109
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)19
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Wanner LMille SBohnet BEugenio BMcRoy S(2012)Towards a surface realization-oriented corpus annotationProceedings of the Seventh International Natural Language Generation Conference10.5555/2392712.2392721(22-30)Online publication date: 30-May-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2392712.2392721
Bohnet BBjörkelund AKuhn JSeeker WZarrieß STsujii JHenderson JPasca M(2012)Generating non-projective word order in statistical linearizationProceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning10.5555/2390948.2391049(928-939)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2390948.2391049
White MRajkumar RTsujii JHenderson JPasca M(2012)Minimal dependency length in realization rankingProceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning10.5555/2390948.2390979(244-255)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2390948.2390979

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Abstract

References

Cited By

Recommendations

A feature-guided grammatical system

Parsing minimalist languages

LLLR parsing

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations