Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/2891460.2891642guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Robust network design for multispecies conservation

Published: 14 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Our work is motivated by an important network design application in computational sustainability concerning wildlife conservation. In the face of human development and climate change, it is important that conservation plans for protecting landscape connectivity exhibit certain level of robustness. While previous work has focused on conservation strategies that result in a connected network of habitat reserves, the robustness of the proposed solutions has not been taken into account. In order to address this important aspect, we formalize the problem as a node-weighted bi-criteria network design problem with connectivity requirements on the number of disjoint paths between pairs of nodes. While in most previous work on survivable network design the objective is to minimize the cost of the selected network, our goal is to optimize the quality of the selected paths within a specified budget, while meeting the connectivity requirements. We characterize the complexity of the problem under different restrictions. We provide a mixed-integer programming encoding that allows for finding solutions with optimality guarantees, as well as a hybrid local search method with better scaling behavior but no guarantees. We evaluate the typical-case performance of our approaches using a synthetic benchmark, and apply them to a large-scale real-world network design problem concerning the conservation of wolverine and lynx populations in the U.S. Rocky Mountains (Montana).

References

[1]
Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71(3):355-366.
[2]
Beier, P.; Majka, D. R.; and Newell, S. L. 2009. Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecological Applications 19(8):2067-2077.
[3]
Borradaile, G.; Klein, P.; and Mathieu, C. 2009. An o (n log n) approximation scheme for steiner tree in planar graphs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) 5(3):31.
[4]
Brown, K.; Prosser, P.; Beck, J.; and Wu, C. 2005. Exploring the use of constraint programming for enforcing connectivity during graph generation. In 5th workshop on modelling and solving problems with constraints (at IJCAI05).
[5]
Cancela, H.; Robledo, F.; and Rubino, G. 2003. Network design with node connectivity constraints. In IFIP/ACM Latin America conference on Towards a Latin American agenda for network research (LANC), 13-20.
[6]
Conrad, J.; Gomes, C. P.; van Hoeve, W.-J.; Sabharwal, A.; and Suter, J. 2007. Connections in networks: Hardness of feasibility versus optimality. In CPAIOR: International Conference on Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 16-28.
[7]
Conrad, J.; Gomes, C. P.; van Hoeve, W.-J.; Sabharwal, A.; and Suter, J. 2012. Wildlife corridors as a connected subgraph problem. J. of Environmental Economics and Management 63(1):1-18.
[8]
Dilkina, B., and Gomes, C. P. 2010. Solving connected subgraph problems in wildlife conservation. In CPAIOR: International Conference on Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 102-116.
[9]
Dilkina, B.; Gomes, C. P.; Lai, K.; Le Bras, R.; McKelvey, K. S.; Sabharwal, A.; Schwartz, M. K.; Suter, J.; and Xue, Y. 2013. Large conservation landscapesynthetic and real-world datasets. In AAAI.
[10]
Garey, M. R., and Johnson, D. S. 1979. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. New York, NY, USA: W. H. Freeman & Co.
[11]
Goemans, M.; Goldberg, A.; Plotkin, S.; Shmoys, D.; Tardos, E.; and Williamson, D. 1994. Improved approximation algorithms for network design problems. In SODA: ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete algorithms, 223-232.
[12]
Gomes, C. P.; van Hoeve, W.-J.; and Sabharwal, A. 2008. Connections in networks: A hybrid approach. In CPAIOR: International Conference on Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 303-307.
[13]
Gomes, C. 2009. Computational sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society. The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering 39(4).
[14]
Hanski, I., and Ovaskainen, O. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404(6779):755-758.
[15]
Hutter, F.; Hoos, H. H.; Leyton-Brown, K.; and Stutzle, T. 2009. ParamILS: an automatic algorithm configuration framework. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 36:267-306.
[16]
ILOG, SA. 2011. CPLEX 12.3 Reference Manual.
[17]
Iverson, L. R., and Prasad, A. M. 1998. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern united states. Ecological Monographs 68(4):465-485.
[18]
Kerivin, H., and Mahjoub, A. R. 2005. Design of Survivable Networks: A survey. Networks 46(1):1-21.
[19]
Lai, K. J.; Gomes, C. P.; Schwartz, M. K.; McKelvey, K. S.; Calkin, D. E.; and Montgomery, C. A. 2011. The steiner multigraph problem: Wildlife corridor design for multiple species. In AAAI.
[20]
McKelvey, K. S.; Copeland, J. P.; Schwartz, M. K.; Littell, J. S.; Aubry, K. B.; et al. 2011. Climate change predicted to shift wolverine distributions, connectivity, and dispersal corridors. Ecological Applications 21(8):2882-2897.
[21]
McRae, B. H., and Beier, P. 2007. Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(50):19885-19890.
[22]
Noss, R. F., and Harris, L. D. 1986. Nodes, networks, and mums: Preserving diversity at all scales. Environmental Management 10:299-309.
[23]
Noss, R. F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience 33(11):700-706.
[24]
Phillips, S. J.; Williams, P.; Midgley, G.; and Archer, A. 2008. Optimizing dispersal corridors for the cape proteaceae using network flow. Ecological Applications 18(5):1200-1211.
[25]
Pisinger, D., and Ropke, S. 2010. Large neighborhood search. In Handbook of metaheuristics. Springer. 399-419.
[26]
Prosser, P., and Unsworth, C. 2006. A connectivity constraint using bridges. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 141:707.
[27]
Shaw, P. 1998. Using constraint programming and local search methods to solve vehicle routing problems. In CP, 417-431.
[28]
Singleton, P. H.; Gaines, W. L.; and Lehmkuhl, J. F. 2002. Landscape permeability for large carnivores in washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-549: USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
[29]
Squires, J. R.; Copeland, J. P.; Ulizio, T. J.; Schwartz, M. K.; and Ruggiero, L. F. 2007. Sources and patterns of wolverine mortality in western montana. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71(7):2213-2220.
[30]
Squires, J. R.; DeCesare, N. J.; Olson, L. E.; Kolbe, J. A.; Hebblewhite, M.; and Parks, S. A. 2013. Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for canada lynx at their southern range periphery. Biological Conservation 157:187-195.
[31]
Verhoeven, M.; Severens, M.; and Aarts, E. 1996. Local search for steiner trees in graphs. Modern Heuristics Search Methods 117-129.
[32]
Walker, R., and Craighead, L. 1997. Analyzing wildlife movement corridors in montana using gis. In ESRI Users Conference, 1-19. ESRI.
[33]
Williamson, D.; Goemans, M.; Mihail, M.; and Vazirani, V. 1995. A primal-dual approximation algorithm for generalized steiner network problems. Combinatorica 15(3):435-454.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
AAAI'13: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
July 2013
1687 pages

Publisher

AAAI Press

Publication History

Published: 14 July 2013

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media