research-article

UML in practice

Author:

Marian PetreAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '13: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering

Pages 722 - 731

Published: 18 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

UML has been described by some as "the lingua franca" of software engineering. Evidence from industry does not necessarily support such endorsements. How exactly is UML being used in industry if it is? This paper presents a corpus of interviews with 50 professional software engineers in 50 companies and identifies 5 patterns of UML use.

References

[1]

Anda, B., Hansen, K., Gullesen, I., and Thorsen, H.K. (2006) Experiences from introducing UML-based development in a large safety-critical project. Empirical Software Engineering, 11, 555-581.

Digital Library

[2]

Andersson, H., Herzog, E., Johansson, G., and Johansson, O. (2010) Experience from introducing Unified Modeling Language/Systems Modeling Language at Saab Aerosystems. Systems Engineering, 13 (4), 369-380.

Digital Library

[3]

Aranda, J. (2010) A Theory of Shared Understanding for Software Organizations. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.

Digital Library

[4]

Aranda, J., Easterbrook, S., and Wilson, G. (2007) Requirements in the wild: How small companies do it. 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’07), 39-48.

[5]

Booch, G. (1994) Object-oriented analysis and design with applications, second edition. Redwood City: Benjamin/Cummings.

Digital Library

[6]

Budgen, D., Burn, A.J., Brereton, O.P., Kitchenham, B.A., and Pretorius, R. (2011) Empirical evidence about the UML: a systematic literature review. Software: Practice and Experience, 41 (4), 363–392.

Digital Library

[7]

Dobing, B., Parsons, J. (2006) How UML is used. CACM 49, 109-113.

Digital Library

[8]

Dori, D. (2002) Why significant UML change is unlikely. CACM, 45 (11), 82-85.

Digital Library

[9]

Forward, A., and Lethbridge, T.C. (2008) Problems and opportunities for model-centric versus code-centric software development: a survey of software professionals. Models in Software Engineering workshop (MiSE ’08) at ICSE, ACM, 27-32.

Digital Library

[10]

Fowler, M. (2003) UML Distilled Third Edition: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modelling Language. Addison-Wesley, 2003.

Digital Library

[11]

Glinz, M. (2000) Problems and deficiencies of UML as a requirements specification language. Tenth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design. 11-22.

Digital Library

[12]

Grossman, M., Aronson, J.E., and McCarthy, R.V. (2005) Does UML make the grade? Insights from the software development community. Information and Software Technology 47, 383-397.

Digital Library

[13]

Hutchinson, J., Whittle, J., Rouncefield, M., and Kristoffersen, S. (2011a) Empirical assessment of MDE in industry. ICSE’11. 471-480.

Digital Library

[14]

Hutchinson, J., Rouncefield, M., and Whittle, J. (2011b) Model-driven engineering practices in industry. ICSE’11. 633-642.

Digital Library

[15]

Jacobson, I., Jonsson, P., and Overgaard, G. (1992) Obect-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Reading: ACM Press / Addison-Wesley.

[16]

Kobryn, C. (2002) Will UML 2.0 be agile or awkward? CACM, 45 (1), 107-110.

Digital Library

[17]

Lange, C.F.J., Chaudron, M.R.V., and Muskins, J. (2006) In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Software, March/April 2006, 40 -46.

Digital Library

[18]

Nugroho, A., and Chaudron, M.R.V. (2007) A survey of the practice of design – code correspondence amongst professional software engineers. International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM ’07), ACM, 467-469.

Digital Library

[19]

Nugroho, A., and Chaudron, M.R.V. (2008) A survey into the rigor of UML use and its perceived impact on quality and productivity. International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM ’08), ACM, 90-99.

Digital Library

[20]

Petre, M. (2009) Insights from expert software design practice. ESEC/FSE'09, ACM, 233-242.

Digital Library

[21]

PR9.NET (2005) Wide gap amongst developers’ perception of the importance of UML tools. Press release, 20 April 2005.

[22]

http://www.pr9.net/comp/development/1674april.html

[23]

Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy,F., Lorenson, W. (1991) Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Digital Library

[24]

Selic, B., Kent, S. and Evans, A. (2000) UML 2000 – Advancing the Standard. Springer-Verlag, LNCS number 1939.

[25]

Störrle, H. (2001) Describing process patterns with UML. Software Process Technology, 2077/2001, 173-181.

Digital Library

[26]

Thomas, D. (2004) MDA: Revenge of the modelers or UML utopia? IEEE Software, May/June 2004, 22-24.

Digital Library

[27]

Tichy, W. (2011) Empirical software research: an interview with Dag Sjøberg, University of Oslo, Norway. ACM Ubiquity, June 2011, 1-14.

Digital Library

[28]

Zeichek, A. (2002) Modelling usage low: developers confused about UML 2.0, MDA. SD Times, 15 July 2002. http://www.sdtimes.com/link/26637

Cited By

Lopes Damian ASieckenius de Souza CConte T(2021)Directives of Communicability for Software ArtifactsProceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality10.1145/3493244.3493276(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3493244.3493276
Noguchi YNishihata SKogure SYamashita KKondo MKonishi TSherriff MMerkle LCutter PMonge ASheard J(2021)What is the Meaning of My Model? - Self-Review Support Environment based on Natural Language Translation from Learners' Software Structural ModelsProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432387(80-86)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3408877.3432387
Lopes AConte TSieckenius de Souza C(2020)Exploring the Directives of Communicability for Improving the Quality of Software ArtifactsProceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality10.1145/3439961.3439974(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3439961.3439974
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

UML in practice
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
      1. Requirements analysis
      2. Software implementation planning
        Software design techniques
    2. Software development process management
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. General programming languages
      1. Language types

Recommendations

How are UML class diagrams built in practice? A usability study of two UML tools: Magicdraw and Papyrus
Highlights
- This paper analyzes how UML class diagrams are built by analyzing 12 h of video recordings of students using MagicDraw and Papyrus to draw example class ...
Abstract
Software modeling is a key activity in software development, especially when following any kind of Model Driven Software Engineering (MDSE) process. In this context, standard modeling languages, like the Unified Modeling Language (UML),...
UML Everywhere

A standardized and widely used diagramming notation is a sign of a profession's maturity. Yet in software engineering, we still use diverse and ad hoc notations. Here, the author proposes that engineers should put their differences aside and make a ...
Executable UML: A Foundation for Model-Driven Architectures

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICSE '13: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering

May 2013

1561 pages

ISBN:9781467330763

General Chair:
David Notkin,
Program Chairs:
Betty H. C. Cheng,
Klaus Pohl

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 18 May 2013

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICSE '13

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

ICSE '13: 35th International Conference on Software Engineering

May 18 - 26, 2013

CA, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

61
Total Citations
View Citations
1,978
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)29
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Lopes Damian ASieckenius de Souza CConte T(2021)Directives of Communicability for Software ArtifactsProceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality10.1145/3493244.3493276(1-9)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3493244.3493276
Noguchi YNishihata SKogure SYamashita KKondo MKonishi TSherriff MMerkle LCutter PMonge ASheard J(2021)What is the Meaning of My Model? - Self-Review Support Environment based on Natural Language Translation from Learners' Software Structural ModelsProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432387(80-86)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3408877.3432387
Lopes AConte TSieckenius de Souza C(2020)Exploring the Directives of Communicability for Improving the Quality of Software ArtifactsProceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality10.1145/3439961.3439974(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3439961.3439974
Kharisma AMardiyanto MBudi AAdinugroho S(2020)Towards text-based domain-specific modeling language for representational state transfer compliant servicesProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology10.1145/3427423.3427454(74-78)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3427423.3427454
Neto VBasso FSantos RBakar NKassab MWerner COliveira TNakagawa E(2019)Model-driven engineering ecosystemsProceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and 13th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems10.1109/SESoS/WDES.2019.00016(58-61)Online publication date: 28-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/SESoS/WDES.2019.00016
Raghuraman AHo-Quang TChaudron MSerebrenik AVasilescu BStorey MAdams BHaiduc S(2019)Does UML modeling associate with lower defect proneness?Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1109/MSR.2019.00024(101-104)Online publication date: 26-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MSR.2019.00024
Störrle HPretschner AVoss SBurgueño L(2019)Modeling moodsProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion10.1109/MODELS-C.2019.00075(468-477)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MODELS-C.2019.00075
Xia XWan ZKochhar PLo DAtlee JBultan TWhittle J(2019)How practitioners perceive coding proficiencyProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering10.1109/ICSE.2019.00098(924-935)Online publication date: 25-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00098
Lopes AOliveira EConte Tde Souza CMussbacher GAtlee JBultan T(2019)Directives of communicabilityProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00127(306-307)Online publication date: 25-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00127
Lopes AOliveira EConte Tde Souza CDittrich YFagerholm FHoda RSocha DSteinmacher I(2019)Directives of communicabilityProceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering10.1109/CHASE.2019.00019(45-48)Online publication date: 27-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CHASE.2019.00019
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten