Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
article

Commuting quantum circuits: efficient classical simulations versus hardness results

Published: 01 January 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The study of quantum circuits composed of commuting gates is particularly useful to understand the delicate boundary between quantum and classical computation. Indeed, while being a restricted class, commuting circuits exhibit genuine quantum effects such as entanglement. In this paper we show that the computational power of commuting circuits exhibits a surprisingly rich structure. First we show that every 2-local commuting circuit acting on d-level systems and followed by single-qudit measurements can be efficiently simulated classically with high accuracy. In contrast, we prove that such strong simulations are hard for 3-local circuits. Using sampling methods we further show that all commuting circuits composed of exponentiated Pauli operators eiθP can be simulated efficiently classically when followed by single-qubit measurements. Finally, we show that commuting circuits can efficiently simulate certain non-commutative processes, related in particular to constant-depth quantum circuits. This gives evidence that the power of commuting circuits goes beyond classical computation.

References

[1]
P. W. Shor (1999), Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 303-332.
[2]
R. Jozsa and N. Linden (2003), On the role of entanglement in quantum computational speed-up, Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 459, pp. 2011-2032, quant-ph/0201143.
[3]
G. Vidal (2003), Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 91, p. 147-902, quant-ph/0301063.
[4]
D. Gottesman (1997), Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction, quant-ph/9705052.
[5]
L. G. Valiant (2002), Quantum Circuits That Can Be Simulated Classically in Polynomial Time, SIAM J. Comput., vol. 31, pp. 1229-1254.
[6]
E. Knill (2001), Fermionic Linear Optics and Matchgates, quant-ph/0108033.
[7]
R. Jozsa and A. Miyake (2008), Matchgates and classical simulation of quantum circuits, Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 464, pp. 3089-3106, arXiv:0804.4050.
[8]
M. Van den Nest (2010), Simulating quantum computers with probabilistic methods, Quantum Inf. and Comp., vol. 11, pp. 784-812, arXiv:0911.1624.
[9]
M. Van den Nest (2012), Efficient classical simulations of quantum Fourier transforms and normalizer circuits over Abelian groups, arXiv:1201.4867.
[10]
B. Terhal and D. DiVincenzo (2004), Adptive quantum computation, constant depth quantum circuits and arthur-merlin games, Quantum Inf. and Comp., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 134-145, quantph/0205133.
[11]
S. Fenner, F. Green, S. Homer, and Y. Zhang (2005), Bounds on the power of constant-depth quantum circuits in Fundamentals of Computation Theory, pp. 44-55, Springer, quant-ph/0312209.
[12]
M. J. Bremner, R. Jozsa, and D. J. Shepherd (2011), Classical simulation of commuting quantum computations implies collapse of the polynomial hierarchy, Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 467, pp. 459-472, arXiv:1005.1407.
[13]
S. Jordan (2010), Permutational quantum computing, Quantum Inf. and Comp., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 470-497, arXiv:0906.2508.
[14]
S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov (2011), The computational complexity of linear optics in Proceedings of the 43rd annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 333-342, ACM, arXiv:1011.3245.
[15]
M. J. Hoban, E. T. Campbell, K. Loukopoulos, and D. E. Browne (2011), Non-adaptive Measurement-based Quantum Computation and Multi-party Bell Inequalities, New J. Phys, vol. 13, p. 023014, arXiv:1009.5213.
[16]
H. Briegel and R. Raussendorf (2001), Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles, Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 910-913, quant-ph/0004051.
[17]
D. Shepherd and M. J. Bremner (2009), Temporally unstructured quantum computation, Proc. R. Soc. A, vol. 465, pp. 1413-1439, arXiv:0809.0847.
[18]
D. Shepherd (2010), Binary Matroids and Quantum Probability Distributions, arXiv:1005.1744.
[19]
S. Bravyi and M. Vyalyi (2005), Commutative version of the k-local Hamiltonian problem and common eigenspace problem, Quantum Inf. and Comp., vol. 5, pp. 187-215, quant-ph/0308021.
[20]
D. Aharonov and L. Eldar (2011), On the complexity of Commuting Local Hamiltonians, and tight conditions for Topological Order in such systems in IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 2011, pp. 334-343, IEEE, arXiv:1102.0770.
[21]
N. Schuch (2011), Complexity of commuting Hamiltonians on a square lattice of qubits, Quantum Inf. and Comp., vol. 11, no. 11-12, pp. 901-912, arXiv:1105.2843.
[22]
M. Hastings (2012), Trivial Low Energy States for Commuting Hamiltonians, and the Quantum PCP Conjecture, arXiv:1201.3387.
[23]
P. Hayden, D. Leung, P. Shor, and A. Winter (2004), Randomizing quantum states: Constructions and applications, Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 250, no. 2, pp. 371-391, quant-ph/0307104.
[24]
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang (2000), Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press.
[25]
J.-L. Brylinski and R. Brylinski (2002), Universal quantum gates, Mathematics of Quantum Computation, quant-ph/0108062.
[26]
J. Dehaene and B. De Moor (2003), The Clifford group, stabilizer states, and linear and quadratic operations over GF(2), Phys. Rev. A, vol. 68, p. 042318, quant-ph/0304125.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Commuting quantum circuits with few outputs are unlikely to be classically simulatableQuantum Information & Computation10.5555/3179448.317945216:3-4(251-270)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
  • (2016)Complexity classification of two-qubit commuting HamiltoniansProceedings of the 31st Conference on Computational Complexity10.5555/2982445.2982473(1-33)Online publication date: 29-May-2016
  • (2014)Hardness of classically simulating quantum circuits with unbounded Toffoli and fan-out gatesQuantum Information & Computation10.5555/2685164.268517114:13-14(1149-1164)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014
  1. Commuting quantum circuits: efficient classical simulations versus hardness results

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Quantum Information & Computation
    Quantum Information & Computation  Volume 13, Issue 1-2
    January 2013
    180 pages

    Publisher

    Rinton Press, Incorporated

    Paramus, NJ

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2013
    Revised: 07 August 2012
    Received: 12 May 2012

    Author Tags

    1. classical simulation
    2. commuting quantum circuits

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)Commuting quantum circuits with few outputs are unlikely to be classically simulatableQuantum Information & Computation10.5555/3179448.317945216:3-4(251-270)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
    • (2016)Complexity classification of two-qubit commuting HamiltoniansProceedings of the 31st Conference on Computational Complexity10.5555/2982445.2982473(1-33)Online publication date: 29-May-2016
    • (2014)Hardness of classically simulating quantum circuits with unbounded Toffoli and fan-out gatesQuantum Information & Computation10.5555/2685164.268517114:13-14(1149-1164)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media