Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/1150034.1150083dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiclsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Scaffolding learner motivation through a virtual peer

Published: 27 June 2006 Publication History

Abstract

It is well-documented that advanced technology can scaffold learning and cognitive development and also that human-peer models in classrooms positively influence learner motivation, in particular, self-efficacy in specific tasks. This paper describes three exploratory studies that investigated the potential of virtual peers (VP, animated digital characters designed as peer-like) to scaffold college students' motivation towards lesson-planning tasks. The studies examined how differing characteristics of the VPs motivated learners, as measured by learners' task-related self-efficacy beliefs and learner interest in the task and in working with the VPs. Study 1 examined the competency and interaction type of a VP; Study 2 examined the gender and emotional expression of VPs; and Study 3 examined the gender and emotional response of VPs. Results indicated the close relationships between learner motivation and VP characteristics. These findings support for the instructional utility of the virtual peers as motivational scaffolds.

References

[1]
Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. (Eds.). (2000). Assessing affective characteristics in the schools (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[2]
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[3]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
[4]
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586--598.
[5]
Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(4), 4--16.
[6]
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 1--23.
[7]
Brody, L. (1999). Gender, emotion, and the family. Messachusetts: Harvard University Press.
[8]
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000). Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 553--574.
[9]
Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725--741.
[10]
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265--272.
[11]
Dietz, J. S., Anderson, B., & Katzenmeyer, C. (2002). Women and the crossroads of science: Thoughts on policy, research, and evaluation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 395--408.
[12]
Jeong, A., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (2003). Gender interactions in online debates: Look who's arguing with whom. Paper presented at the The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
[13]
John-Steiner, V. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191--206.
[14]
Kim, Y. (2005). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: Building social relations with learners. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[15]
Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30--43.
[16]
Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
[17]
Lee, E. (2003). Effects of gender of the computer on informational social influence: The moderating role of task type. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 347--361.
[18]
McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.). (2000). Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
[19]
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543--578.
[20]
Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffoldig and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423--451.
[21]
Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[22]
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149--174.
[24]
Schunk, D. H., Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer model attributes and children's achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 54--61.
[25]
Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning diabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344--364.
[26]
Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers' emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327--358.
[27]
Weiner, B. (1992). Motivation. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed., pp. 860--865). New York: Macmillan.
[28]
Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Social goals and social relationships as motivators of school adjustment. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment (pp. 226--247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[29]
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89--100.
[30]
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215--246.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Motivating mobilityProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1978942.1979397(3073-3082)Online publication date: 7-May-2011
  • (2008)Playing with virtual peersProceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 210.5555/1599871.1599919(382-389)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2008

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ICLS '06: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences
June 2006
1127 pages
ISBN:0805861742

Publisher

International Society of the Learning Sciences

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2006

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

ICLS '06 Paper Acceptance Rate 142 of 142 submissions, 100%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Motivating mobilityProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1978942.1979397(3073-3082)Online publication date: 7-May-2011
  • (2008)Playing with virtual peersProceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 210.5555/1599871.1599919(382-389)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2008

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media